Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vidyut Metallics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh and ors.

Decided On : Mar-17-2008

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 60, Section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 60, Section 2(16, Section 26, Section 26, Item 5, Item 2, Item 5, Item 2.(3, Section 26, Section 5, Item 1, Section 26 of the Act, Section 30, Section 20, Section 23, Section 32, Section 30, Section 32, Section 30(1)(b, Item 5, Item 5, Section 60 of the Act, Item 5, Item 5, Item 5, Item 5, Item 5, Item 2, Item 5, Item 2, Item 5, Item 5, Item 5, Item 2, Section 60 of the Act, Item 5, Items 5, Section 60, Section 33C, Section 2(k, Section 2A, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(k, Section 2A, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2A, the Industrial Disputes Act, Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Item 5, Section 60

PERSON: D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1, Kamgar Sabha, Plaint, Schedule III, Schedule III, Schedule IV, Kamgar Union, Labour, Sangh, Blackburn, Schedule III, Schedule III, C.S. Dharmadhikari, P.B. Sawant, Schedule III, Schedule III, Kamlakar Shantaram, Krishna Kant, Act.(3, Schedule III

ORG: Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Mumbai Mazdoor Sabha, the Vidyut Metallics Employees Union, Maharashtra Rajya Kamgar Sabha, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, the Industrial Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendants, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, the Industrial Court, Complaint, ULP, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, Court, Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, Counsel, Court, Plaintiff, III, the Labour Court, the Industrial Court, Clauses, the Industrial Court, Plaintiff, Court, the Industrial Court, III, the Industrial and Labour Courts, Labour Courts, Court, Court, Court, Court, Defendants, the Labour Court, the Industrial Court under Sections 28, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Cipla Limited, Maharashtra General, the Supreme Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Cipla, the Industrial Courts, Cipla, the Supreme Court, the Industrial Court, the Labour Court, Courts, Cipla, the Supreme Court, Refining Co. Ltd., damnum sine, Rawyards Coal Co., AC 25, the Industrial Court, Court, Court, Rohtas Industries Ltd., Rohtas Industries Staff Union, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Statute, Court, the Industrial Court, the Labour Court, the Industrial Court, Labour Court, Court, Nichani Hotels Corporation, Bombay Labour Union, FLR 340, Court, the Civil Court, the Industrial Court, Labour Court, Blaze Advertising Private Limited v., Blaze Advertising, Allied Co.'s, Employees' Union, Plaintiff, Clauses, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Industrial Court, Complaint, ULP, the Industrial Court, the Respondents Union, Managerial, Court, ULP, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Integra, the Supreme Court, The Premier Automobiles Ltd., Act.(4, Chapter VA, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Court, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders, Civil Court, Government, Parliament, the State Legislatures, the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Standing Orders, the Industrial Employment (Standing Order, Standing Orders, the Civil Court, Civil Court, un, the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, the State of Maharashtra, III, Court, Court, Clauses, Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, Defendants, Notice of Motion 429 of 2008, Clauses, the Notice of Motion

CARDINAL: about 1,260, about 18, 50, 154, 47.68, two, 47.68, 50, 1971.7, three, three, 1, 1, 1, 2, 5, 2, 5, 3, 30, 1, 754, 949, 24, 959, four, two, 5, 1976)ILLJ274SC, 42, 5, 5, three, three, one, two, 5, 6, 200, 6, 206, two, 6, II, 180, 1947.(2, two

GPE: Mumbai, Thane, Sarva, Livingstone, exhaustive.16

DATE: 2001, the year 2004, 1971, 30th January, 2004, 2nd February, 2006, 24th March, 2007, 31st March, 2007, 29th June, 2007, 18th July, 2007, 8th August, 2007, August, 2007, 21st January, 2008, 2007, 9th July, 2007, 1971, 1908, 2001, 2003, 1880, 6, 8, 10)12, 1981, 1981, every day, question.15, 1985 L.I.C. 1015, 33 of 2004, 31st January, 2004, 2007, 14th August, 2007, 1995, 1946, 1946, 1971, 1971

ORDINAL: third, 9th, second, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, second

LOC: Plaintiff, Learned Single

PRODUCT: Plaint, Plaint

EVENT: Schedules II

FAC: Schedules II, Schedules II

TIME: working hours, the working hours

MONEY: 711

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //