Shri D.S. Jadhav Vs. the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, Bombay High Court and Ors.

Decided On : Sep-20-1994

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of Constitution of India, Article 235 of the Constitution of India, Article 235 of Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 20(3, Constitution, Article 235 of the Constitution, Article 20(3, Constitution, Article 20(3, Constitution, Article 20(3, Section 45(9, the Banking Companies Act, Article 20(2, Constitution, Article 20(2, Constitution, Article 20(3, Constitution, Section 161/165 Indian Penal Code and Section 5(2, Article 20(2, Constitution, Article 20, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: D.R. Dhanuka, i. e. shouting, Constables Madhav Bhaguji Nagare, Nasik, Petitioner, Enquiry, Enquiry Officer, Enquiry Officer, Enquiry Officer, F. I. R., Panchanama, Enquiry Officer, i. e. under Sections 85(1, Kathi Kalu Oghad, S. A. Venkataraman v. Union of India, Enquiry Officer, Enquiry, Enquiry Officer, Counsel

NORP: J.1, Maharashtra

ORG: Judicial, Judicial Magistrate, the State of Maharashtra, the Government of Maharashtra, the High Court on Administrative, Additional Sessions, Judicial, Judicial, the Writ Courts, Judicial, Judicial, the High Court, Poona-Nasik Road, Judicial, the High Court on Administrative, the High Court, Maharashtra, Junior Division, Judicial Magistrate, Junior Division, Judicial Magistrate, Poona-Nasik Road, Judicial, Nashik Road Police Station, Chemical Analyser, the Medical Officer, the Enquiry Officer, Judicial, the Enquiry Officer, the P. S. I. Nashik Road, Police Station, the Chemical Analyser, Civil Hospital, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, The High Court, Administrative, the High Court, The High Court, of-1990, Court, Judicial Magistrate, Disciplinary Enquiry, Article, Court, the Supreme Court, Departmental Enquiry, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court of India, the Supreme Court, Public Servants (Inquiries, the Departmental Enquiry, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Supreme Court, Supreme, the Supreme Court, Kathi Kaiu's, the Supreme Court, Kathi Kalii's, the Disciplinary Enquiry, Court, Bytco Hospital, Civil Hospital, Judicial, the Maharashtra Civil Services, Government, Government, Counsel for Respondents, Court, Court, Judicial, State, Petition

DATE: 2nd March, 1993, August, 1989, 15th February, 1982, the month of August, 1989, 26th August, 1989, that day, the same day i.e., August, 1989, that day, 1991, 26th July, 1991, August, 1991, 6th September, 1991, September, 1991, 13th August, 1991, August, 1991, 13th August, 1991, 13th May, 1990, 1990, 26th August, 1990, that day, 16th January, 1992, 7th March, 1992, 16th April 1992, 12th February, 1993, 1949, 1949, 1850, 1979

ORDINAL: 4th, 26th, 5th, 3rd, 3rd, 7th, 1983ECR1598D(SC, first, first

EVENT: Additional District, the Bombay Prohibition Act

GPE: Judges, Ahmednagar, Vasai, Civil, Bombay, India, Maqbool Hussain v. State, Bombay

FAC: Additional District and Sessions, Nashik Road, Para No

TIME: about 8.45 p.m.

PRODUCT: Para 9

CARDINAL: 3, 3, two, 5640, 66(1)(b, 1961CriLJ856, 1954CriLJ993, 15, 3, 28(d, two

WORK_OF_ART: Prakash Bhagwan Gosavi

MONEY: 0.069 per cent