Nagpur Distillers Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary Prohibition and Excise Department and

Decided On : Nov-30-2006

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 137, Section 137, Sales Tax Act, the Sales Tax Act, Section 137, Section 137, Section 68, Article 226 of the Constitution on the ground, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 137, Section 137, the Indian Constitution, Rule 5, Rule 8

PERSON: R.C. Chavan, Nagpur v. State of, Pleader, Pleader, Government Pleader, Controller, Bhojpur, laches.12, Government Pleader, Government Pleader, Government Pleader, Anr, Anr, Government Pleader, Anantramsingh Thakur v., Pleader, Gulabsingh Anantramsingh Thakur, Dr. Smt, Kuntesh Gupta v. Management, Anr, Pleader, Nagpur v. State of, Somras Distillers, Somras Distillers, Pleader, Anr, Rule, Somras Distillers, fees.27, Pleader, Anr, Tagin Litin v. State of Arunachal Pradesh, Pleader, Bachhittar Singh's, Tagin Litin's, Somras Distillers

NORP: J.1, Indian

CARDINAL: 2, 4, 11-3-2005, 2, 29, 2, 18, 30-3-2002, 2, 30-3-2002, 2, 31-3-2002, 5, 2, 4, 2, 1-4-2002, 31-3-2002, 2, 11-3-2005, 28, 18-3-2005, 19-4, 2, 2, 4, 11-3-2005, 2, 2, two, 13, 30-3-2002, 2, 13, 18, 2, 2, 11-3-2005, 2, 1, 4, 26, 11-3-2005, 1989(40)ELT226(SC, 1969]2SCR861, 1992]2SCR155, 13, one, 4, 11-3-2005, 2, 4, 11-3-2005, 1983]142ITR663(SC, 1996(1)MhLj549, 1987(32)ELT8(SC, 2004)3SCC553, 11-3-2005, 1, 2-3-1993, 3-3-1993, 1,50,000/-towards, 2-6-1993, 17-4-1993, 2-6-1993, 17, 30-3-2002, 17, 2-6-1993, three, 2005)194CTR(SC)257, 45, two, two, two, one, 2, 11-3-2005, 2, 2, 4, 4, 19, 2, 18, 11-3-2005, 30-3-2002, 2, 2, 2, 30-3-2002, 2, 2, 30-3-2002, 30-3-2002, 2, 112002/42759/5, 4, 2, two, two, 4, 2, 30-3-2002, 2, 11, 30-3-2002, 2, 2, 2, 30-3-2002, 2, 30-3-2002, 30-3-2002, 30-3-2002, two, 2, 2, 4, 11-3-2005, 31-3-2002, 30-3-2002.35

ORG: State, Private Limited Company, PLL, the Government of Maharashtra, Home Department, Government, PLL, the Reserve Bank of India, Annexures K & L, PLL, Court, Somras Distillers, L.J. 782, Court, Rup Diamonds and Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Durga Prashad, Court, the Supreme Court, Counsel, the Supreme Court, Dehri Rohtas Light Railway Company Limited, District Board, Company, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Dehri Rohtas Light Railway Company Limited, the State Government, Court, the Supreme Court, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd., High Court, Orissa High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Amravati, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, U.P., the High Court of Allahabad, the Supreme Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, ABL International Ltd., Anr, Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., Ors, Court, Court, Court, Asmaco Plastic Industries, Court, Court, Court, Courts, the State Government, Court, Court, Court, Court, L.J. 782, CL-1, PL-L' and 'RS-2', Firm, the State Government, Court, Court, Court, the State Government, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Godfrey Phillips India Ltd., U.P., Court, the Apex Court, the State Government, the Bombay Privilege Fees Rules, Counsel, Department, Court, CL-1, PLL, CL-1, Government, PLL, the Government of Maharashtra, CL-1, PLL, the Government of Maharashtra, the Government of Maharashtra, Home Department, Government, CL-1, PLL, the State Government, the Competent Authority, PLL, the Competent Authority, PLL, Government, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Council of Ministers, Court, the Council of Ministers, Court, State, the Government of Maharashtra, Home Department, Court, State, State, the Competent Authority, CL-1, PLL, the State Government, the State Government

GPE: Mumbai, Orissa, Sitapur, Somras Distillers, India, Counsel, Bachhittar, Singh v. State of Punjab, Mantralaya, passed.33

DATE: the year 2001-2002.3, the year 2002-2003, the year 2002-2003, 11-5-2002, the year 2002-2003, the year 2002-2003, 1996, one year, one year, year, the year 1968, 1953-1954 to, 1967-1968, 1971-1972, the year 1974, para 5, the year 1994, the year 2003.18, 1992, L.J. 1212, about 8 years, this petition.20, the year 2002, 1996, 1954, the year 2005-2006, the year 2002-2003, 4-5-2002, the order.32, years, the year 2001-2002

TIME: 10-1-2002

EVENT: the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act.23

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, first, first, Secondly, Thirdly

PRODUCT: Constitutional