NavIn Parekh Vs. Madhubala Shridhar Sharma and ors.

Decided On : Apr-29-1992

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 482, Section 500, the Indian Penal Code, Section 499, the Indian Penal Code, the Evidence Act, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 499, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 499, Section 105, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482, the Indian Penal Code, Section 105 of the Evidence Act, Chapter 4, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Contract Act, Section 23, Section 24, Section 188, the Contract Act, Section 223, the Contract Act, Section 126 of the Evidence Act, Article 134(1)(c, Section 482

PERSON: M.F. Saldanha, Complainant, Ramraj Nahata, Prakash Mehra, Exhibit, Ramraj Nahata, Baphana, Ramraj Nahata, Baphana, Navin Parekh, Ramraj Nahata, Ramraj Nahata, Ramraj Nahata, Navin Parekh, Parekh, Parekh, Prabhakar Sukhdeo Pansare, Parekh, Queen Empress, Parekh, M. Gopi v. A. Shamsuddin, Prabhakar Sukhdeo, Nana Appa AIR 1934 Bom, Parekh, Nagarji Trikamji ILR, Law, Purshottamdas Ranchhoddas, Parekh, Parekh, Parekh, Daman, Diu J.C.'s, Bakar, Tulsidar Amanmal Karani, Parekh, N. Krishna Plllai, Konath Madhavi Amma v. S.M. Sherief, Parekh, Parekh, K.B. Ghosh, J., Bhalchandra, Rangrao Amrutrao, Parekh, S.C. Sarkar v. Mahendra K. Saraf, Hitherto, Baphana, Baphana, R.K. Karanjiya, Baphana, Balraj Khanna, Moti Ram, Law, Baphana, Tikaram Agarwala, Nagawwa, Veeranna, Nagawwa, Parekh, Baphana, Pulmann, Hill 1891, Q.B. 524, Gaborn, KB, Baphana, Baphana, Baphana, Parekh, Baphana, Baphana, Baphana, Ayesha Bi v. Peer, Khan Saheb, Baphana, Harbhajan Singh v. State of Punjab, Baphana, Chimanlal, Baphana, Balraj Khanna, Mott Ram, Law, Baphana, Baphana, Baphana, Baphana, Sampatraj, Parekh, absolute.34, Thakkar, Parekh

NORP: J.1, English, English, Indian, irrelevant.30

ORG: Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, the Indian Motion Pictures Producers' Association, IMPPA, Executive Committee, IMPPA, IMPPA, IMPPA, IMPPA, IMPPA, the Executive Committee, IMPPA, IMPPA, IMPPA, IMPPA, inter alia, IMPPA, IMPPA, the Executive Committee, xerox, the Executive Committee, Court, Court, the Executive Committee, IMPPA, the Bar Council of Maharashtra.8, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court, Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Criminal Courts, Trial Magistrate, Bar, Association, Association, Court, Court, Sukhdeo Vithal Pansare, this High Court, Court, the Allahabad High Court, Court, Sections 126, Court, Boxsius v. Goblet 1894, Edmondson v. Birch 1987, Sukhdeo Vithal, Court, Court, Court, Hormusji K. Bhabha v., Court, Court, Court, the Division Bench, the Bombay High Court, BLR, Court, the Trial Magistrates, Baker v. Carrick, Q.B. 838, the Court of Appeal, Boxsius v. Goblet Freres, Court, L.J. 117, Court, Court, Court, S.F. Billimoria AIR, Bar, Court, Court, M.K. Parameshwara Kurup v., Court, Court, Court, Kerala High Court, the High Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, this High Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Bar, the Trial Court, the Supreme Court, Sewakram, the Supreme Court, Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Supreme Court, the High Court, Magistrate, Madhavrao, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Madhavrao, the High Court, the Trial Court, English Courts, the Supreme Court, Mahto v. Basudeo Kumar, the Supreme Court, Court, Supreme Court, Exception, Municipal Board, Konch, L.J. 282, Court, Court, Deepchand, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, High Courts, the Supreme Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court

LOC: Esplanade, the Ninth Exception to Section 499, the Ninth Exception, the Ninth Exception to Section 499, the Ninth Exception to Section 499, the Ninth Exception to Section 499

GPE: Bombay, Counsel, it.7, you.3, amicbaly, Scindia, facts.12, Taki Hussain, Bombay, Counsel, Emperor, Cri, Broomfield, India, Tarapada, India, India, Shikachand, judgments.32, arise.36

WORK_OF_ART: Criminal Case No, the Film Industry Anti-Video Piracy Organization, The Queen v. Sankara ILR

DATE: 1987, the month of November 1984, 14.5.1985, 4.6.1985, monthly, the period 24th to 26th April 1985, 15.10.1985, 17.12.1985, 2.4.1986, 17.12.1985, January 1987, 17.12.1985, the same day, 17.12.1985, 15.1.1987, 27.1.1987, about two months, 15th January 1987, 20th January 1987, November 1984, 1287, 1894, 1894, 1981, '18, 1932, 1980, 1986, 1973, 1988, 54, 1883 Mad

CARDINAL: one, two, 1, one, one, 1, 1, 1, 4.6.1985, 1, 1.2, 1, 15.10.1985, 1, 15.11.1985, 1, 1, 20.1.1986, 1, 1, 500/-, 1, 33, 36,560/-.4, 1, 1, 23, 33, 1, 1, 15, 1, 1, 15, 1, 1, 1, 1, 15, two, 1, two, 1, 2, 1, 1, almost 200, 14, almost another 100, 11, 100, three, one, two, 205, 127, 129, 1, 842, 1, 371, 299, 19, 340, 499, one, 9, One, two, 490, 9, 83, 2, 564, 1, one, 1, 1971CriLJ1110, 1978CriLJ1687, 1976CriLJ1533, 1, 266, 1971CriLJ1168, 1971CriLJ1110, 381, 1

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, first, third, third, second, first, secondly

PRODUCT: Ramraj Nahata, BLR 12

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English, English

MONEY: 821

PERCENT: hundred percent

FAC: Hareram Satpathy and Ors