Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rajnarainsingh Avadhraj Singh, Vs. Smt. Vidyadevi Widow of Ramraj Singh Kalu Singh,

Decided On : Dec-12-2002

Court : Mumbai

LAW: CivilApplication No., the Civil ApplicationNo, Section 5 of theLimitation Act, Section 5 of Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 12, Section 12, Order 41 Rule 1 of, the Limitation Act, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5 of the Act, Order 41, Section 5, Section 5, Section 12, Section 5, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Order 41 Rule 17, Section 151, Order 17

PERSON: Khandeparkar, Petitionersthat, Petitionershas, Petitionerswith, Udayan Chinubhaiv, R.C. Bali, Judgmentof, Udayan Chuimanbhai's, Bench, Asalready

WORK_OF_ART: Civil ApplicationNo, Memorandum of Appeal

DATE: 1932, 2002, 2002, 1995, October, 2001, 1932, 2002, 6thOctober, 2001, 2001, 23.3.2001, 18.7.2001, 14.9.1995, 14.9.1995, 14.9.1995, 22.3.2001, the text day i.e., 14.9.1995, 1963, 1982, 6.10.1995, 15.11.1995, 15.11.1995, four weeks, 24.2.1997, six weeks, 24.2.1997 six weeks, that day, 2001, 23.1.2001, that day, three months, 23.3.2001, 22.6.2001.However, four weeks, that day, three months, 12.12.2000the earlier, 15.11.1995, 15.11.1995, 15.11.1995, 1963, 30 days, such 30 days, '15, the 1st of January 1964clearly, '16, six weeks, 14.9.1995, 18.7.2001, 14.9.1995, 14.9.1995, four years, 23.3.2001, seven months

CARDINAL: 891, 1.4.2002, 24.1.2001, 22.6.2001, 11.3.2002, 8.1.2001, more than 4, 8.1.2001, thePetitioners, 12.12.2000, 315, 19.1.2001, 24.1.2001, 12.12.2000was, 6.9.2001, 22.6.2001, 12.12.2002clearly, 24.1.2001.10, 15.11.1995, 12.12.2000, 5, 12, one, 12, 1.7.2002, more than one, 14, 1.1.2001, 24.1.2001, 12.12.2000it, 22.6.2001, 6.9.2001, 1, 1, 12.12.2000, 22.6.2001clearly, 6.9.2001, one, 3

ORG: Appeal, LettersPatent Appeal No, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, Court, thePetitioners, SingleJudge, Appeal, Appeal, Appeal, thePetitioners, Suit, theJudgment, theJudgment, Petitioners, Petitioners, Advocate, Court, Petitioners, Appeal, Petitioners, Decree, Appeal, thePetitioners, thePetitioners, Respondents, Advocate forthe Respondents, Judgment, thePetitioners, Reliance, Apex Court, AIR 1977 SC, Court, Vachha & Co., Respondents, Petitioners, theJudgment, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, theCourt, theCourt, Petitioners, Court, theFirst Appeal, Petitioners, Court, Court, Courtordered, Court, Petitioners, Court, the Petitionersor the Respondents, Court, Petitioners, Court, Single Judgepassed, theJudgment of the trial court, CPC, the Appellate Side Rules, Petitioners, Court, thePetitioners, the Memorandum of Appeal, thePetitioners, theRespondents, The Apex Court, Explanation, JaddishKrishn Kapoor's, ApexCourt, the Division Bench, Court, Respondents, Limitation Act.17, Judgment of the High Court, theJudgment, Courtsare, Registry, 31.7.1995, the Counsel of thePetitioners, LettersPatent Appeal, DivisionBench, Petitioners, Advocate, the City Civil Court, Court, theMemorandum of Appeal

NORP: Petitioners

PRODUCT: Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Appellant, Judgment, Judgment, 24.2.1997, Judgment

GPE: Appealand, J.K., decree.12, Limitation, makingan, Judgmentand, January-2001, Singh, theJudge

TIME: four weeksfrom, nobody'scase

ORDINAL: firstly, secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //