In Re: Shailesh Harinarayan Bajaj Vs. Creative Outerwear Ltd.

Decided On : Jan-17-2003

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 176 of the Contract Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 12(2, the Insolvency Act, Section 9(2, Section 9(5)(a, Section 9(5)(a, the Notice of Motion, Section 176, the Contract Act, Section 12, Section 9(5, Section 9(5, Section 9(5, Article 372 of the Constitution of India, Article 372, Section 9(5, Article 372, Article 366(10, Constitution, Article 372, Article 254, Article 254, Article 254, Section 9(5, Article 254(2, Article 372, Section 107(2, Article 254(2, Article 254(2, Article 254(1, the Central Amendment Act, Section 9(5, Article 254, Article 254 of the Constitution of India.11

PERSON: F.I. Rebello, J.1, Motion, Bench, J. P. Tiwari v., Bhimraj Harlalka, Order XXXVII, Desai v., Karsondas Patel, Mohanlal Bapalal Bahia, Motion, Exhibit, Harinarayan G. Bajaj, Nos, Moran Mar Basselios, Catholicos, Anr, Mar Poulose, J. P. Tiwari v., Bhimraj Harlalka, Gupta, J. P. Tiwari, J.P. Tiwari, Jagannath, Ali, Anr, W. B. Essential, Anr, Sharad R. Khanna, Bijaysingh Mansingh Baid, Mansingh H. Baid, Law, Nicholas, and(3, T. Barai, Henry Ah Hoe, Anr

ORG: Summary Suit, Insolvency, Summary Suit, Court, Summary Suit, Court, the Summary Suit, Court, Court, Court, S.L.P., the Apex Court, the Summary Suit, Sesa Goa Ltd., the Judgment Creditors, Sesa Goa Ltd., Sesa Goa Ltd., Court, Insolvency, Court, Court, Insolvency, the Apex Court, the Insolvency Court, Insolvency, the Insolvency Court, Court, Insolvency, the Bombay Insolvency Rules, the High Court of Judicature, Original Side, Court, Court, Court, Court, Reliance, Indian Bank, Maharashtra State Co-operative, Marketing Federation Ltd., the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Court, Hormasji Maneckji, Court, the Insolvency Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Shanlal v. Bank of Maharashtra, Court, Court, Reliance, Court, Court, Pramod Parmeshwarlal Banka, Suit No, Reliance, the Insolvency Petition, AIR, SC, the Apex Court, Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority v., Shiv Saraswati Iron & Steel Re-rolling Mills, the Apex Court, Court, Court, the Insolvency Court, the Insolvency Court, Court, Court, BLR, Court, Insolvency, Court, Division Bench, Court, Court, Counsel, Messrs Ice Supplies, Court, the Insolvency Court, Court, Division Bench, Court, the Division Bench, Court, the Insolvency Notice, Court, Court, Sesa Goa, Court, Court, Reliance, S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Sections 172, Reliance, Lallan Prasad v., the Apex Court, Apex Court, UCO Bank, BLR 4, Apex Court, Court, Court, the Insolvency Petition, Swadesh Agro Farming & Storage Pvt. Ltd., The Apex Court, Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd., Ors, Court, Parliament, Court, Court, Court, Judgment, Court, the Judgment Creditor, Court, Farohar & Co., Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Parliament, Legislature, Parliament, the Legislatures of State, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Legislature, State, the Legislature of the State, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, Legislature, State, Parliament, the Legislature of the State, the State Assembly, Parliament, Parliament, State, Parliament, Parliament, Notice, Parliament, the State Assembly, State, the State Assembly, U.P., Apex Court, under:--'(29, State, Commonwealth, the Commonwealth Court, State, Commonwealth, Court, Uttar Pradesh, Court, SCR, AIR, Centre, State, Parliament, Parliament, the State Legislature, the Apex Court, the Union Parliament, State, State, State, Parliament, State, State, Parliament, State, Parliament, State, Parliament, Parliament, Notice of Motion, Learned Counsel, Parties/Authorities

DATE: 1999, 2002, 1999, 10th June, 1996, three months, 13th September, 1998, 1909, 1998, today, 1998, 1998, 1910, 1980, 1947 Bom, 1988, 1988(3, 2nd December, 2002, 1998, 1954, 1958, 1956, 27th July, 1956, 13th September, 2002, 1999, 29th March, 2001, 1978, four weeks, today

WORK_OF_ART: the Summons for Judgment No, Share Certificates, the Summons for Judgment, the Summons for Judgment, C.J., the Current List, 2nd Edition

CARDINAL: 26, 2002.3, 4,000, 35,000, 4,000, 4,000, 7, 4,000, 35,000, three, 52A(1, 35,000, 35,000, 1998]3SCR187, 204, 232, 956, 114, 4,000, 4,000, 4,000, 4,000, 26, 5217/99, 4,000, 18, 4000, 4000, 50,00,000/-, 19000, 6/S/98, 4000, 6/S/98, 1, 35,000, 8(f, 8(g, 6, 4,000, 4,000, 4,000, 500/-, 4,000, 60, two, 4,000, 4,000, 35,000, 4,000, 176, 94, 1993(1, 546, 2000)1BOMLR760, 16, 16, 10, 19, 79, 1, 2, 303, three, 1956]1SCR393, three, 1955]1SCR799, 807, 757, two, three, two, 1983CriLJ164, two, two

EVENT: Notice under Section 9, Australian Constitution

ORDINAL: Secondly, first, Secondly, Secondly, secondly, first, first, second, first, second, firstly, firstly, secondly, firstly

FAC: Notice, the Insolvency Notice, Notice No, Notice

GPE: Counsel, Suit No. 5217 of 1999, Bombay, Messrs, Bombay, Chagla, L.Rs, Counsel, Deep Chand, Tika Ramji v. State, Zaverbhai Amaidas v., Bombay, Centre

PRODUCT: Official Assignee, Respondent, Respondent

LOC: Suit No, Criminal

NORP: Bharat, Rules