Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shatrughna Shravan Kamble Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Decided On : Oct-31-2002

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 17, Section 5(4, Section 3 of the Act, Section 5-A of Act 59 of 1952, Section 5-A of the Act, Section 5(4, Section 5A of the Act, Section 5A of the Act, Section 5A

PERSON: S.S. Parkar, Ramnath Sadashiv Koltharkar v. State, Daud Bhura, D. G. Deshpande, Rule, S. P., Tahilramani, J., Ramanath Koltharkar's, S. P., S. P., Ramnath Koltharkar's, Koltharkar, Exhibit, Rupwate, Daud Bhura, N. Rishbud, Anr, Castes, Tribes, Castes, S. P., H. N. Rishbud v. State, S. P., S. P., Mubarak Ali, Mubarak Alt, Sailendranath Bose v. State of Bihar, Khandu Sonu Dhobi, A. C. Sharma v., S. P., Magistrate, S. P., Gupte, S. P., S. P., Mubarak, Mubarak Ali's, Ramnath Koltharkar's, Mubarak Ali's, Mubarak Ali's, Koltharkar, Gupte, Addl

NORP: J.1

ORG: Bench, Court, Single Judges, Court, the Central Government, Dahanu Police Station under Section 3(1)(x, Sub Inspector of Police, the Court of the Addl, Court, Circular, S.P., Dahanu, PSI, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, U.P., State, U.P., Special Courts, the High Courts, the Sessions Courts, the Central Government, the Apex Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Asst, the State Government, Inspector of Police, a Metropolitan Magistrate, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Police, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Magistrate, The Supreme Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, follows:'In, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, the Court of the Special, the High Court, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Rishbud, the Supreme Court, U.P., the Supreme Court, Sub Inspector of Police, the Supreme Court, Rishbud, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, State, above.14, the Supreme Court, State of Uttar Pradesh, Bhagwant Kishore, AIR 1968 SC 1292, Delhi Administration, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the State Government, the Supreme Court, the Prevention of Atrocities Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Rishbud, Rishbud, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sub Inspector, Palghar, Court

LOC: Single, the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes, Single

DATE: 11th December 2001, 1989, 1995, 1989, 21-11-1998, 31st December 1998, 26th March 1989, 30th July 1999, 7th March 2000, 31st July 2001, 1989, the year 1995, 1988, 1947, 1947, 1947, 1995, 7th March 2000, 2001

CARDINAL: two, 1999(5)BomCR255, 2001)4BOMLR181, 4, 101/1998, 133, 2001.5, 2, 4, 6-8-2001, 2001)4BOMLR181, 1955CriLJ526, 1964CriLJ11, 1964CriLJ140, 1955CriLJ526, two, 4, 8, 9, 11, 10, 10, two, 1959CriLJ920, 1964CriLJ11, 7, 1964CriLJ140, 1972CriLJ593, 1973CriLJ902, 7, 4, 6-8-2001, 133

GPE: Yunus, Batta, Palghar, Batta, Yunus, Delhi, Munnalal v. State, Delhi, Munnalal v. State, Munnalal, Deshpande

WORK_OF_ART: the Scheduled Castes, The Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes

ORDINAL: first, second, First, Firstly, Secondly, first, second

PRODUCT: follows:'

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //