Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Shatrughna Shravan Kamble Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Decided On : Oct-31-2002
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 17, Section 5(4, Section 3 of the Act, Section 5-A of Act 59 of 1952, Section 5-A of the Act, Section 5(4, Section 5A of the Act, Section 5A of the Act, Section 5A
PERSON: S.S. Parkar, Ramnath Sadashiv Koltharkar v. State, Daud Bhura, D. G. Deshpande, Rule, S. P., Tahilramani, J., Ramanath Koltharkar's, S. P., S. P., Ramnath Koltharkar's, Koltharkar, Exhibit, Rupwate, Daud Bhura, N. Rishbud, Anr, Castes, Tribes, Castes, S. P., H. N. Rishbud v. State, S. P., S. P., Mubarak Ali, Mubarak Alt, Sailendranath Bose v. State of Bihar, Khandu Sonu Dhobi, A. C. Sharma v., S. P., Magistrate, S. P., Gupte, S. P., S. P., Mubarak, Mubarak Ali's, Ramnath Koltharkar's, Mubarak Ali's, Mubarak Ali's, Koltharkar, Gupte, Addl
NORP: J.1
ORG: Bench, Court, Single Judges, Court, the Central Government, Dahanu Police Station under Section 3(1)(x, Sub Inspector of Police, the Court of the Addl, Court, Circular, S.P., Dahanu, PSI, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, U.P., State, U.P., Special Courts, the High Courts, the Sessions Courts, the Central Government, the Apex Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Asst, the State Government, Inspector of Police, a Metropolitan Magistrate, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Police, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Magistrate, The Supreme Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, follows:'In, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, the Court of the Special, the High Court, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Rishbud, the Supreme Court, U.P., the Supreme Court, Sub Inspector of Police, the Supreme Court, Rishbud, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, State, above.14, the Supreme Court, State of Uttar Pradesh, Bhagwant Kishore, AIR 1968 SC 1292, Delhi Administration, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the State Government, the Supreme Court, the Prevention of Atrocities Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Rishbud, Rishbud, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sub Inspector, Palghar, Court
LOC: Single, the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes, Single
DATE: 11th December 2001, 1989, 1995, 1989, 21-11-1998, 31st December 1998, 26th March 1989, 30th July 1999, 7th March 2000, 31st July 2001, 1989, the year 1995, 1988, 1947, 1947, 1947, 1995, 7th March 2000, 2001
CARDINAL: two, 1999(5)BomCR255, 2001)4BOMLR181, 4, 101/1998, 133, 2001.5, 2, 4, 6-8-2001, 2001)4BOMLR181, 1955CriLJ526, 1964CriLJ11, 1964CriLJ140, 1955CriLJ526, two, 4, 8, 9, 11, 10, 10, two, 1959CriLJ920, 1964CriLJ11, 7, 1964CriLJ140, 1972CriLJ593, 1973CriLJ902, 7, 4, 6-8-2001, 133
GPE: Yunus, Batta, Palghar, Batta, Yunus, Delhi, Munnalal v. State, Delhi, Munnalal v. State, Munnalal, Deshpande
WORK_OF_ART: the Scheduled Castes, The Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes
ORDINAL: first, second, First, Firstly, Secondly, first, second
PRODUCT: follows:'