Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Adil K. Patel

Decided On : Nov-30-2001

Court : Mumbai

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 25-G of Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-G of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 61, Section 2(oo, Article 226, Section 25-G of Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-G, Item 1(d, Rule 62, the Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 62, Section 2(p, Section 38, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 18, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Amending Act, Rule 58, Section 2(p, the Industrial Disputes Act

PERSON: R.M. Lodha, H.H. KANTHARJA, A.P. SHAH, A.P. SHAH, A.P. SHAH, V.C. DAGA, A.P. SHAH, V.C. DAGA, Naik, Naik, Anr, Anr, Naik, Naik, Naik, Raghavendra Mathur v., C.U. Singh, Item Nos, Naik, Siddik Mahomed Shah v., Nagubai Ammal, B. Shama Rao, Kumar v. State, Naik, Naik, K.D. Patel, Y.M. Bhangle, sd/- sd/- (, Sd/-, G. Jayagopalan Iyer, Delhi Cloth, Delhi Cloth, Delhi Cloth, Naik, Raghavendra Mathur, Exhibits W-2, Shri A.K. Basu, Raghavendra Mathur, Raghavendra Mathur, Raghavendra Mathur, February19

NORP: J.1, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Company, Company, Rules, American, Hon'ble

ORG: the Division Bench, Court, Court, Court, Appellants, Appeal, Respondents, Bench, Bench, Court, Delhi High Court, Lachman Das, Indian Express Newspapers, the Apex Court, Association, the Apex Court, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Ors, Allahabad High Court, Allahabad Bank, the Labour Court, Schedule IV, the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, MRTU & PULP Act, the Accounts Department, Tatas, the Accounts Department, P.F. Section, the Share Department, Tata Share Registry Private Limited, the Central Share Department, Central Share Department, Tata Share Registry Private Ltd., the Central Share Department, the Central Share Department, Tata Share Registry Pvt, The Labour Court, the Labour Court, Schedule IV of MRTU, MRTU & PULP Act, Delhi High Court, Lachman Das, the Additional Labour Court, the Additional Labour Court, the Additional Labour Court, the Additional Labour Court, the Additional Labour Court, Court, Civil, the Supreme Court, the Division Bench, Delhi High Court, the Central Share Department, Central Share Department, the Central Share Department, Department, the Central Share Department, the Central Share Department, the Apex Court, Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, Union, form:'HEAD OFFICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION', TATA HOUSING CENTRE, LALLUBHAI, The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.,Head Office, Bombay House, Tata Share Registry Pvt. Ltd., the Tata Central Share Department, Tisco, the Tata Central Share Department, the Head Office, the Share Department, the Tata Share Registry, Tata Share Registry, Tata Share Registry, Basic + D.A. + Service Allowance, Company, Tata Share Registry, the Tisco Management, Association, Tisco, Tata Share Registry, Share Department, Tata Share Registry, Tisco, Housing, Housing Loan, Tata Share Registry, Tisco, Tata Share Registry, Housing Project, a Housing Project, Housing Loan, Tisco, Tata Share Registry, Tata Share Registry, the Share Department Employees, XVI, General Mills Ltd., General Mills Ltd., Apex Court, The Supreme Court, the Apex Court, General Mills Ltd., the Apex Court, Hindustan Lever Limited, Allahabad High Court Judgment, Hindustan Lever Ltd., the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Tribunal, Lever Mazdoor Sabha, jargon, the Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Shri C.J. Mahimkar, the Apex Court, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Allahabad High Court, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Hindustan Lever Ltd., Court, Allahabad High Court, Allahabad High Court, the CentralShare Department, the Tata Central Share Department, Tata Share Registry Private Limited, Tata Central Share Department, the Tata Share Registry Private Limited, the Tata Share Registry, the Tata Share Registry Pvt. Ltd., Letters Patent Jurisdiction.20, the Letters Patent Appeal, Letters Patent Appeal

DATE: June 22, 1994, the 1st, tomorrow, June 23, 1994, one week, today, the day, June 22, August 20, 2001, August 14, 2001, a period of, two weeks, October 22, 2001, October 22, 2001, June 22, 1994, 1977, February 7, 1986, 1971, about May 15, 1979, July 5, 1979, the year 1979 to 1982, the year 1982, the year 1984, the year 1985, December 31, 1985, June 30, 1986, February 7, 1986, January 30, 1986, February 12, 1986, February 12, 1986, February 19, 1986, March 10, 1986, August 27, 1991, February 14/15, 1994, March 10, 1986, paras 5 to 8, more than four years, 1972 to 1976, four years, the month of July, 1979, the year 1984, about 15/16 months, '10, February 7, 1986, February 7, 1986, February 7, 1986, 12 months, January 31, 1986, 1957, 1972)ILLJ99SC, more than a decade, '10, 1981, 1957, 1957, 1959, 1964, December 22, 1964, '7, 1956, 1957, '16, February 7, 1986, February 7,1986, February 7, 1986, 1986, January 30, 1986, '18, February 7, 1986, February 7, 1986, Four weeks

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2, 1994.2, 1, 4, three, 1, 823, 1960)ILLJ504SC, 1, 1990)ILLJ273All .5, 1(a, 9, 10, 16, 16, two, 1, one, 6, 7., 1956]1SCR451, 8., two, 1973]1SCR718, 8, two, 1, 14, 14, 14, 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, one, 10, 1984)ILLJ388SC, three, three, one, 7, 1990)ILLJ273All, 1, 14, 14, 16, two, 14, one, 14

PERCENT: 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 4%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 9%

WORK_OF_ART: Their Lordships The Hon'ble

PRODUCT: Respondent, Mt. Saran, Rule 62

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, Firstly, Secondly, first, second, first, first, first, first

GPE: Swadesamitran, Workmen, Kamni, Swadesamitran, Bombay, Tisco, Tisco, Tisco, p.a., Andheri, Tisco, R.R., Workmen, India, India, India, Bombay, Bombay, India, Workmen

LOC: East

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //