Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

NijamuddIn Mohammad Bashir Khan and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Jul-07-2006

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 167(2, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 167(2)(a)(i, Section 167(2)(a)(ii, the Division Bench, Section 366, Section 34, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 366, Section 34, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2)(a)(ii, Section 366, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2)(a)(i, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Division Bench, Section 386, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2, Section 386, the Indian Penal Code, Section 307, the Indian Penal Code, Section 307, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2)(a)(i, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 167(2, Section 167, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 57, Chapter, Section 167, the Criminal Procedure Code, Act 45 of 1978, Section 167, Section 167 by Act 45 of 1978, Act 45 of 1978, Section 344, Section 173, Section 167 of the Code of, Section 167(2, Act 45 of 1978, Amendment Act, Article 39A, Article 21, Section 167 by Act 45 of 1978, Section 167, Section 366, the Indian Penal Code, Section 366, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2)(a)(ii, Chapter 33, Section 57, Section 167(2, the Amending Act, the General Clauses Act, the Limitation Act, Section 366, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 386, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2)(a, Section 167(2)(a, Section 167, Section 167(2, Section 386, Section 386, Section 167(2, Section 386, Section 167(2, Section 386, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2, Section 167(2)(a)(ix, Section 167(2)(a)(ii, Section 366, Section 167(2)(a)(ii, the Indian Penal Code, Section 167(2)(a)(ii

PERSON: J.N. Patel, J.1, Bench, Begum Mohammad Siraj Dhobi, Nos, Mohd, Arif Din Mohd, Addl, A.P.P.7, Gadkari, Mohammed Arif Din Mohd, Shaikh, Singh Govardhan, Singh Kashyap v. State, Anr, Mohammed Arif Din Mohd, Shaikh, Vithal Giri, Anr, Singh Govardhan, Singh Kashyap v. State, Mohammed Arif Din Mohd, Shaikh, Mohammed Arif Din Mohd, Shaikh, Vishnu Sahai, Singh Govardhan, Singh Kashyap v. State of, Anr, Magistrate, Chaganti Satyanarayana, Malabar Parida v. State, Magistrate, Chapter.16, Addl, Addl, Addl, Mohammed Arif Din Mohd, Shaikh, Singh Govardhan, Singh Kashyap v. Suite, Anr, Mohd, Arif Din Mohd, Shaikh

ORG: Court, Court, Court, State, the Supreme Court, Rajeev Chaudhury, Smt, Sahar Police, Magistrate, Byculla Prison, Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, Metropolitan Magistrate, Court, the Court of Sessions, Bail Application, Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, A.P.P., Court, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, A.P.P., Court, Santosh, The State of Maharashtra, Court, Rajeev Chaudhury, State, Rajeev Chaudhury, State, Santosh, Rajeev Chaudhury, State, the Supreme Court, Proviso, Court, A.P.P., Court, Court, Coram, Santosh, Pralhad Vithal Giri, the Metropolitan Magistrate, 22nd Court, Andheri, Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, Proviso, Magistrate, Proviso, Proviso, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, The Public Prosecutor, A.P., Hyderabad, LJ, the Supreme Court, Legislature, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Ors, the Supreme Court, Magistrates, Magistrate, Legislature, State, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrates, Hussainara v. Stale of Bihar, Magistrate, Magistrate, the State Government, Magistrate, State, Magistrate, Magistrate/Court, the Magistrate/Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, Hussainara v. State of Bihar, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Proviso, Proviso, Proviso, Proviso, The Supreme Court, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, Rajeev Chaudhury, State, Rajeev Chaudhury, State, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, Rajeev Chaudhury's, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Rajeev Chaudhary, Slate, the High Court, the High Court, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Rajeev Chaudhary, the Investigating Agency, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Rajeev Chaudhary, the High Court, the Metropolitan Magistrate, State, Rajeev Chaudhary, State, Court, Court, Santosh, Karnataka High Court, Sections 306, Court, Santosh, the Supreme Court, Rajeev Chaudhary v. State, Court, Pralhad Vithal Giri, The State of Maharashtra, Court, Rajeev Chaudhary v. State of, the Apex Court, Rajeev Chaudhary v. State of, Magistrate

DATE: 60 days, more than 60 days, 60 days, 90 days, 60 days, 90 days, 2006, 60 days, 60 days, 60 days, 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 10 years or less, 10 years or, more.10, less than ten years, less than 10 years, 10 years, less than 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 90 days, fifteen days, the period of fifteen days, ninety days, less than ten years, sixty days, ninety days, sixty days, 60 days, 90 days, less than 10 years, 60 days, 60 days, 10 years, 90 days, 1986, 1975, 1212, sixty days, sixty days, 90 days, less than ten years, up to 60 days, 1973, 15 days, 15 days, 60 days, 60 days, less than 10 years, 90 days, 60 days, 7 days, 90 days, 60 days, the period of 90 days, 60 days, less than ten years, 90 days, 60 days, 10 years, less than 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 60 days, 60 days, 90 or 60 days, 60 or 90 days, 1978, 90 or 60 days, 60 or 90 days, less than ten years', ten years', 5, ten years, 10 years or less, ten years, 5, the period of fifteen days, ninety days, ten years, less than 10 years', more than 90 days, 60 days, 10 years, 90 days, 10 years, 10 years, 10 years, 10 year or less, 10 years, less than ten years, less than 10 years, 10 years, less than 10 years, 10 years, 5, 10 years, the period of, 60 days, 5, 10 years, 10 years, less than 10 years', 10 years, less than 10 years, 60 days, 10 years, less than 10 years, 10 years, 60 days, 90 days, ten years, the period of, 60 days

GPE: us.2, C.R., Mumbai, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Proviso, Natabar, Orissa, Orissa, Proviso, Satyanarayana, Proviso, Delhi, Delhi, Proviso, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Babu v. State, Karnataka, Babu v. State, Karnataka, Singh v. State of Maharashtra, Delhi

CARDINAL: 7, two, 7, 14/06, 10-3-2006, 1, 2, 2000(5)BomCR95, 500, 2000(5)BomCR95, 167(2)(a)(i, 2000(5)BomCR290, 2002(4)MhLj148, 2001CriLJ2941, 1, 2, 3, 10-3-2006, 1, 2(A), 4, 5, 6, 13, 2, two, 1134, 12, 2, 2, 7, 2, 2A, 1979CriLJ1052, 1, 2, 2, two, 1, 2, 3, 2, 2, 30, 22, 3, 4, 6, 4, twenty-four, 2, less than, ten, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 4, 6.18, 1997(4)KarLJ238, 498

NORP: Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Maharashtra, Maharashtra

TIME: twenty-four hours, twenty-four hours

PRODUCT: Chapter XXXIII, Bench

ORDINAL: second, third, first, first

LOC: Chaganti Satyanarayana

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //