Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Madhu V. Holamagi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Additional Solicitor General and the U.S.A. Through Its Consulate
Decided On : Jul-31-2008
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, Constitution, Article 226, Constitution
PERSON: Swatanter Kumar, Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware, M Furquan v. Jet Airways, Rajiv Ranjan Singh Lal, T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad, Y.K. Sabharwal, S.H. Kapadia, Ram Jethmalani, Janata Dal v. H.S. Chowdhary, S.H. Kapadia, Kumar Pandey, Andre Rabie, Dattaraj N. Thaware, Dattaraj N. Thaware
GPE: Mumbai, U.S.S.R., Pakistan, U.S., India, India, Centre, U.S., India, U.S., India, Judges, Ajit Pasayat, Australia, India, India, Courts, today.12
ORG: Bombay City Civil and Sessions Court Bar Association, Court, Public Interest Litigation, Nation, Nation, Nation, Nation, Court, Court, this Public Interest Litigation:(a, Public Interest Litigation, National, Hon'ble Court, same;(b, Nation, Court, Civil Application, Public Interest Litigation, the No Confidence or Trust, Court, Court, Court, Respondents, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, State of, Ors, Court, a Public Interest Litigation, another v. Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, under:.The, Solicitor General, v. Union of India, Solicitor General, PIL, PIL, State of Maharashtra (2005, Gupta v. Union of India, State, PIL, The Supreme Court, Court, a Public Interest Litigation, M.V. Holamagi v. Union of India, the Government of Australia, Government of United Kingdom, United National Organization, the Government of United Kingdom, VISA, Governments, the Government of India, Court, Court, Court, PIL, Court, Advocate, the Court of law, the Supreme Court, Court, Public Interest Litigation', Court, Public Interest Litigation, Court, Court, Court, Court, this Public Interest Litigation, Rupees Five Thousand, the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority, the Civil Application
NORP: British, Communist, C., Indian, Indians
DATE: 1947, 21st/22nd July 2008, 2006, 37, 5, 9, 10, 12, October 2007, four weeks
CARDINAL: 123, 123, 2008(1)MhLj231, 2006)205CTR(SC)53, 98, 5, 23):Howsoever, 25, 26, 1993CriLJ600 109, 1, 4, 14.Ashok, 12, 219, 24)24, two, 129, 5,000/-
EVENT: World, the Nuclear Test or Nuclear Programme
FAC: Nathuji Thaware
PERCENT: 7 Judges
WORK_OF_ART: Ashok Kumar Pandey
PRODUCT: Judgment
ORDINAL: 26th, first