Vinod Kumar S/O Sudarshan Kelkar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Sep-21-2004

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 46, the B.S.F. Act, Section 302, the Indian Penal Code and Section 46 of the B.S.F. Act, Section 428, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 121-A of the B.S.F. Act, Section 428 of the Code, Section 121A, the B.S.F. Act, Section 428 of the Code, Section 121A, the B.S.F. Act, the B.S.F. Act 35 of 2000, Section 428 of the Code, Section 121A, the B.S.F. Act, the Constitution Bench, the B.S.F. Act, Section 121A, Section 428, Section 121A, the B.S.F. Act, Section 428 of the Code, Section 121A, the B.S.F. Act, Section 121A, Section 428, Section 428, Section 428, Section 428, Section 428, Section 484(2, Section 428 Criminal Procedure Code, Section 121A, the B.S.F. Act, Constitution Bench, Section 433-A, Section 432 or Section 433, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 428, Section 428, Section 432, Section 433A of the Code, Constitutional, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Section 428 of the Code, Section 57, Section 428, Para 11, Section 432 or Section 433, Section 433A, Section 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the B.S.F. Act, Section 5 of the Code, the B.S.F. Act, Section 428, Section 5 of the Code, Section 5 of the Code, Section 5, the Procedure Code, Section 5 of the Code, the B.S.F. Act, Section 428, the B.S.F. Act, the B.S.F. Act, Section 428 of the Code, Section 428 of the Code, the B.S.F. Act, Section 428 of the Code, the B.S.F. Act, Section 5 of the Code, Section 121A, the B.S.F. Act, Section 5 of the Code, Section 428, the B.S.F. Act, Section 5 of the Code, the B.S.F. Act, Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 46 of the B.S.F. Act, Section 428 of the Code, the B.S.F. Act, Section 121A, the B.S.F. Act, Section 428, Section 428 of the Code and Section 121A, the B.S.F. Act

ORG: S.T. Kharche, the Security Force Court, the Border Security Force Act, Border Security Force, Battalion Border Security Force, the General Security Court, Nagpur Central Prison, Border Security Force Police, Security Force Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Bhagirath v. Delhi Administration, the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court, Singh Bishit v. Union of India, L.J. 563.6, the Border Security Force Act, the Border Security Force Act, the Border Security Force Act, the Border Security Court, the Border Security Force Act, Security Force Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Section, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Section, Delhi High Court Reversed, Ashok Kumar v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, inter alia, L.J. 736, Mam Ram's, Court, Court, Court, Government, Sections 432/433 of the Code, Court, The Border Security Force, Maru Ram v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, Anand Singh Bishit, L.J. 563, the Supreme Court, Maru Ram, the Calcutta High Court, Anand Singh Bishit, the Border Security Force, Security Force Court, the Border Security Force Act, Section, Security Force Court, arise.16

NORP: J.1, Rules

DATE: 1968, the year 1991, 26-12-1993, 1 year 7 days, 17-7-1992, 1181, 20 years, Godse 1961(1, 1182, more than one year, '12, '13, 1986, 1968, the period of pre

GPE: Putshahi village, Central Jail, Tihar, Anand, Cri, Kartar, Singh v. State, Harayana, B.P., Kartar, Singh v. State, Bhagirath, rejected.10, Cri, Cri, Godse, Cri

PERSON: District Kupwada, Nagpur, Nos, Nos, Nos, Boucher, Pierre Andre v. Superintendent, Ashok Kumar @ Golu v. Union, Shri Kaptan, Nos, Andre v. Supdt, Kaptan, Harayana, Delhi Administration, Bhagirath, Godse, Bhagirath

CARDINAL: 132, 17, 29, 1, 2, 3, 29, 1, 2, 3, 14, 14-3-2002, 14-3-2002, 1, 2, 1-9-2000, 1975CriLJ182, 1985CriLJ1179, 1991CriLJ2483, 17, 1-9-2000, 1, 2, 1-9-2000, 17, 121A, 1975CriLJ182, 132, 1985CriLJ1179, 1991CriLJ2483, 12, two, 1985CriLJ1179, 1980CriLJ1440, two, 1980CriLJ1440, three, 10

ORDINAL: first, Secondly, Firstly, Secondly, third

PRODUCT: Articles, Para 9

FAC: Gopal Vinayak Godse