In Re: Reunion Electrical Mfrs. (P.) Ltd.

Decided On : Mar-02-2006

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Companies Act, Section 18, the Limitation Act, Section 18.Section 18, the Limitation Act, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 18, the Limitation Act, Section 19, Section 19, Section 19, Explanation 1, Section 8, Section 8(4)(a, Section 8, Section 6, Section 7 of the Act, Section 8(1, Section 8 nor Rule 12, Section 18, the Limitation Act, Section 25(3, the Indian Contract Act, Section 19, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 18 of 1963 Act, Section 19, Section 19, The Indian Limitation Act, Section 19, Section 19, the Indian Limitation Act, section 18, the Limitation Act, Section 18, the Limitation Act, Section 25, the Indian Contract Act

PERSON: S.J. Vazifdar, Paragraphs 3, Saraf, Naidu, Fredoom Mazda, Tilak Ram v. Nathu, Fredoom Mazda, Prosad, Fry L.J., Humphreys, permit.11, Fredoom Mazda, Fredoom Mazda's, Naidu, Saraf, Saraf, Maniram, Seth Rupchand, Rupchand, Will, Rupchand, Rupchand, Rupchand Nanabhai, Mitchell, Maniram, Mitchell, lorry receipts

NORP: J.1, consideration.--An, Indian, Indian, Mellish, Mellish, English

CARDINAL: 433, 434, 13,19,833.48, 58, 8, 3-11, 9-8-2005.4, 5-11, 6,61,540.27, 22-11-2001, 19-4-2002, 19-4, 29, 9-6-2005.(b, 3, 5, 5, 9-6-2005, 31-3-2002, 1, 9-6-2005, 3-11-2001, two, 3, 5, 9-6-2005, 1, two, two, 26, 474, 3, 4, 1, 4, 3,26,530.27, 1, 3, 5, 9-6-2005, 1, 19-4-2002, 9-6-2005, 3, 5, 7,67,646.21, 3, 5, 9-6-2005, 2, 3, one, 21, 12, 5,841.91, 2,801.20, 5, 106, 6, 822, 28, 5, 9-6-2005, 1963.29, 9-6-2005, 9-6-2005, 9-6-2005, 6, 822, 9-6-2005, 9-6-2005, 9-6-2005, one, 9-6-2005, 1, 6,61,540.27, 5-11, 9,00,000, 2,000

DATE: 1956, 9-8-2005, more than three years, 9-8-2005.7, 1872, 1962]1SCR140, 1962]1SCR140, 1884, 1967, 19-9-2003, '24, 1872, 20-9-1899, the last five years, 1877, 28-9-1899, 1877, 1963, twelve weeks, today, four weeks

ORG: Kandhan Electricals & Engineers, Advocate, Advocate, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, Durga Prasad Chamaria, the Supreme Court held:(6, the Supreme Court, Court, Durga, Court, Court, Court, Courts, Government, the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, Central Sales Tax, State, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, the Supreme Court, E-1, the Supreme Court, the 'C' Forms, the 'C' Forms, the 'C' Forms, Company, Motiram, Motiram, Motiram Rs, Motiram, Motiram, Mahajan of Burhanpur paying Rs, The Privy Council, the Privy Council, Motiram, Lordships, Motiram, Limitations, River Steamer Co., Lordships, the Privy Council, Maniram, Maniram, The Privy Council, Maniram, River Steamer Co., Advocate, Company, Free Press Journal, Navshakti, Maharashtra Government Gazette, Court

QUANTITY: 9-4-2001

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, first, first, first, first, second, first, secondly, third, first, first

GPE: Shapoor, Shapur, Green v., Clause, Shapoor, Shapoor, England, India, L.J., L.J., it.33

MONEY: four per cent, 9 per cent, 20 per cent

LANGUAGE: English, English, English