Dr. Emerico D'Souza Vs. State through the Deputy Conservator of Forests

Decided On : Jul-08-1994

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Forests Act, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 52, the Indian Forest Act, Rule 64, section 30, the Evidence Act, section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, section 72, the Indian Forests Act, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, the Code of Criminal Procedure, section 72, the Forests Act, the Forest Act, Section 33, section 26, the Indian Evidence Act.8, the Code of Criminal Procedure, section 21, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, section 21, Section 21, section 21, section 21, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, section 25, the Indian Evidence Act

PERSON: A.A. Halbe, J.1, Nos, Nos, Panaji, Forest Officers, Magistrate, Baduka Joti Svant, Pandurang Kadvalkar, Nos

DATE: 1927, 1964, 15th September, 1992, 1992, 9th June, 1898, 1944, 12-9-1991, 14-9-1992

CARDINAL: 30, as many as nine, 1, 2, 9.2, 22, 8 and 9, 1992.3, 2, 1993.4, 1, 2, 64, 65, 33, 26, 1966CriLJ1353, 22-6-1992, two, one, 3 to 6, 1, 9, 0.529, 9, 9, 1, 9, 1, 9

ORG: the G.D.D. Forest Rules, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, State, Criminal Revision No, Criminal Appeal No, the Indian Forest Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, The State Government, same;(b, a Civil Court, or(d, Magistrate, Forest, P.P., P.P., the Supreme Court, The State of Mysore, Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, Forest, Criminal Miscellaneous Application

WORK_OF_ART: Criminal Case No

GPE: India, Bihar, Bihar, Kadval, notebook.12, Velguam

PRODUCT: officers.10, m3

NORP: Sissum, Sissum