Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Bombay Vs. Essar Steel Ltd., Bombay

Decided On : Apr-26-2001

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 30, The Law 8, The Contract Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Agreement, the Constitutional Bench, the Constitutional Bench, the Constitutional Bench, the Constitutional Bench, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 29, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 3, the Interest Act, Section 3(l)(a, Section 3, the Interest Act, the Interest Act

PERSON: B.N. Srikrishna, V. D. Tulzapurkar, Retd, J. G. Bodhe, Appellants, Appellants, Award, Award, J.C. Budharaja, Anr, Dev Dun Pandit, Orissa, Sudhakar Dass, Anr, Order, Order, Addendum, Bid Package, 39,07,55,000/-, Bid, Bid, India Bidders, 39,07,55,000/-, Award, aside.22, Chagla, Award, J. G. Bodhe, Shri J. G. Bodhe, J. G. Bodhe, Chagla, V. D. Tulzapurkar, Shri Tulzapurkar, Award, Shri Chagla, Chagla, J. and K. Handicrafts, Jammu, Good Luck Carpets, Award, Chagla, Anr, R.J. Shah, Paragraphs 25, case.36, K.C. Sethia, Ujjam Bat v. State, Anr, Chagla, it.41, Award, Claim Nos, Claim Nos, Singhvi, G.C. Roy, Award, Award, Award

CARDINAL: 1, 6-9-2000, two, two, two, 1, one, 1, 2, 3, 26, 4, 5, two, 70, 41, 33, 3., three, only three, one, more than one, only one, 3, 122, 1997]2SCR132, 1991]2SCR924, 2000)3BOMLR870, one, about 16, ten, 44, 88, 5, 4, 12, 15, three, 1, 39,07,55,000, Thirty Nine, Seven, 2., 3, 4, 5., 6., 8, 28,52,51,150/-, Twenty Eight, Fifty Two, 9, 16, 2, 5,86,13,250/-, two, two, 2, 2, 2, 1940.'Even, two, 3, 12, 1991]2SCR924, 1998)9SCC410, 10, 1989]1SCR665, 31, 1998)9SCC407, 43, 1999]2SCR643, 26, 26, 42, 16.2, 2, 2, 2000)3BOMLR870, one, 3.7, 1, 31, 17.5, 1-11-1990, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 31, 1999]2SCR830, 3.7, 3, 4, One, 2, 971, 1990.45, 2, 3.2, 4,16,15,565/-, 3.7, 3.7, 2

DATE: 1940, the year 1985, 23rd June, 1986, 23rd June, 1986, 28th June, 1986, 11th August, 1986, 20th August, 1986, 22nd August 1986, 15th September, 1986, 16/17th September, 1986, September, 1986, 20th September, 1986, 23rd September, 1986, 9th October, 1986, 10-10-1986, 15th September, 1986, 13th October, 1986, 14th October, 1986, the appellantby 15th May, 1987, 15th September, 1986, 14th October, 1986, the period November, 1986, May, 1988, 6th December, 1986, 10th December, 1986, 19th March, 1987, 23rd June, 1986, 14th October, 1986, 15th May, 1987, 30th June, 1988, 13 1/2 months, 1st August, 1989, 3rd January, 1989, 1st November, 1990, 15 days, 17th January, 1991, about 13 1/2 months, 15th March, 1991, 12th April, 1991, 12th April 1991, the 1st, the 1st, seven days, the 1st, 6th November, 1990, December, 1991, 1st December, 1999, 2000, 6th September 2000, 14th October, 1986, 1940, 1999, 28th June, 1986, 18th July, 1986, 18th July, 1986, 14, September 1996, September 17, 1986, 15th September, 1986, 20th September 1986, March 1986, 10th October 1986, October, 13, 1986, 14th October, 1986, September 1986, Five Thousand, 28th June, 1986, 15th May, 1987, 15th May, 1987, 2 years, 15th September, 1986, 15 days, a period of, 12 months, 13th Oct. 1986, 17th September, 1986, October, 1986, October 20, 1986, October 1986, '17, 27th October, 1986, 14th October, 1986, 31st October, 1986, November, 17, 1986, 20-8-1986, 29th October 1987, 1st August, 1989, 1990, 12th April 1991, 1st November, 1990, 19th September 1986, 14th October, 1986, 1st November, 1990, 15 days, 3rd January 1989, 30th January, 1989,, February 1989, 21st February 1989 and, 27th July 1989, 1st November, 1986, 15 days, 1st, November 1990, 15 days, January 17, 1991, 1st November, 1990, November, 1990, 15th of March, 1991, 14th October, 1986, 14thOctober, 1986, '27, 36, 34).32, 35).33, 1944, 1988, 1988, any date earlier than 1st November, 1990, 1st November, 1990, 1940, 1996, 1978, 1978, 1978, November, November, 1990, 47

LOC: Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, South Field, Kashmir, Single

ORG: Hydro Carbons, WIPPM, cost,'if, Rupees, Rupees, the Reserve Bank of India, the Government of India, Corporation, the Government of India, the Government of India, the Government of India, Government, the Government of India, WIPPM, the Contract Price, the Government of India, Corporation, The Government of India, Corporation, the Government of India, WIPPM, the Government of India, the General Conditions of Contract, Court, Court, Court, the Division Bench, Appellants, Court, the Joint Arbitration, the Bank Guarantee, Plaint, the Bank Guarantee, Arbitration, the Bank Guarantee, the Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Appellants, Appeal, Court, Arbitration Petition No, Arbitrator, the General Conditions, J. D. Bodhe, Court, the Supreme Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd., Government and Mining Contractor, State of J & K, T.S.E.B., State, Court, Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Pune Helium India Pvt, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Minerals Ltd., Eastern Engineering Enterprises, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Continental Construction Co, Ltd., Alopi Parshad v. Union of India, inter alia, Indian Rupees, Exchange, State Bank of India, United States Dollars/, Pound Sterling, Essar, the Government of India, Government, Foreign Exchange, Government of India, Telex of Intent, ONGC, Telex of Intent, ONGC, Government, Conditional Telex of Intent, Telex of Intent, WIPPM Project, Conditional Telex of Intent, ECL/NRK/2640/86, WIPPM Bid Package, Taxes, Government of India, ONGC, ONGC, Liquidated Damages @ of, the Nationalised Bank, ONGC, FOB Point, the Conditional Telex of Intent, M/s Essar Construction Ltd., ONGC, Performance Guarantee, Indian Rupees, the Foreign Exchange Component, ECL/NRK/85/HO/1036, Foreign Exchange, Indian Rupees, The Foreign Exchange, The Foreign Exchange, Steering Committee, Government, Indian Contractors, the Government of India, the Government of India, the Owners of the Project, the Government of India, Government of India, the State Bank of India, Foreign Exchange, Bank Guarantee, contract.20, the Government of India, Government, The Government of India, Government, NIT, Minerals Ltd., Supreme Court, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, Court, Arbitrators, Arbitration, the Contract for Water Injection Pipelines, Platform Modification, Shri Justice, M/s Crawford Bayley and Co., Solicitors, the General Conditions of Contract, Arbitrators, Arbitration, Arbitrators, the General Conditions, Contract, the Supreme Court, Waverly June Mills Co. Ltd., Raymon and Co., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Mills Co. Ltd., Minerals Ltd., Mills Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, Supreme Court, Court, East India Trading Co., Badat and Co. :, Arbitrators, Minerals Ltd., Vide, The Supreme Court, Associated Engineering Co. v., Government of Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court, Minerals Ltd., Vide, the Supreme Court, Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., The Supreme Court, Minerals Ltd., Vide, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., Sudarsan Trading Co. v. Government of Kerala, Court, Sudarsan Trading Co., Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court, P.V. Subba Naidu, the Supreme Court, Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court, H. P. State Electricity Board, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Minerals Ltd., Minerals Ltd., Pratabmull Rameshwar v., Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1962 SC 1621, Arbitrators, the Appeal Court, Arbitrators, Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court, alone.39, Board of Trustees, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Pune Helium India Pvt. Ltd., Court, Court, Arbitrators, the Supreme Court, Oil and Natural Gas Commission, M.C. Clelland Engineers S.A., Clauses, Court, the Supreme Court, Arbitrators, Court, the Supreme Court, Irrigation Department, Government of India, the Supreme Court, Court, Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Bharat Conductors Pvt, Ors, LJ, Court, Court, Court, Court

WORK_OF_ART: 'Water Injection Pipeline and Platform Modification', The Managing

FAC: the Bombay High Offshore, discernible.25

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, incurredon, Tender, Indian, Tender, Indian

PERCENT: 15%, 15%, 15%, 15%, 15%, 12%, 25%, 75%, 3%, 15%, 15%, 7 1/2%, Seven and half percent, 7 1/2%, 10%, 73%, 15%, 17.5%, 12%, 17.5%, 17.5%, 1%, 12%, 12%, 17.5%, 1%, 12%, 12%, 12%, 12%

ORDINAL: 3rd, 2nd, 1st, 1st, 1st, 16th, 3rd, 15th, 14th, 14th, First, second, 1st

TIME: the minutes, 30-11-1991, the minutes, these minutes, the minutes, 3 i.e.

GPE: Rajasthan State Mines, BB, L.D., Bombay, Bombay, Delhi, TT, damages.19, Rajasthan State Mines, India, Rajasthan State Mines, New York, reference.30, Rajasthan State Mines, Rajasthan State Mines, Jammu, Rajasthan State Mines, K.R., Raveendranathan, Kerala, Rajasthan State Mines and, Rajasthan State Mines and, Rajasthan State Mines and, Rajasthan State Mines and, Rajasthan State Mines and Minerals Ltd., Rajasthan State Mines, issue,40, p.a., p.a., p.a., made.42

PRODUCT: Arbitrator, Award

MONEY: six per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //