Sharad MittersaIn Jain, Vs. State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Feb-27-2003

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 406, Section 406, Section 2(17, Section 2(e, the Factories Act, Section 2(e, Section 7 of the Factories Act, the Factories Act, Section 405, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Explanation 2 to Section 405, Explanation 2, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: J.G. Chitre, J.1, Madhav Nagar, Shri Doiphode, Manoj Mohite, Misc, Shri Mohite, Shri Saste, Nos, Chandigarh, Tulsidas Kalichand

ORG: Shri J.B. Doiphode, Provident Fund Inspector, Court, Cotton Mills Ltd., District Sangli, Court, Magistrate, IPC, the Bombay High Court, Yeshwantrao Dattaji Chougule and Ors, State, the Supreme Court, Employees State Insurance Corporation, S.K. Agarwal and Ors, SC, the Employees State Insurance Act, Employees Provident Fund, Supreme, Magistrate, Court, Judicial Magistrate, Supreme Court, Employees State Insurance Corporation, S.K. Agarwal and Ors, the Supreme Court, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Court, the Employees State Insurance Act, Court, Court, the Employees State Insurance Act, the Bombay High Court, the Division Bench, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, the Employers State Insurance Act, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, M/s. Indo Japan Steel Ltd., the Supreme Court

DATE: months May, June and, July, the month of August 1994, II 1993, 1998, 1948, 1952, 1948, 1948, 11, 12, 1991, 1948, 1948, 1984, 1948, 1973

CARDINAL: 8.9.1994, 27,740/-, 4.1.1995, two, two, two, 1, 2, 4, 777, two, 63, 6, 1, 1, 63, two, 13, 10, 24, 17, 1614.8, 11, 12, two, two

MONEY: as ESI Act

GPE: Suresh, Bombay