Anil Shankarrao Zade Vs. State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Aug-20-2001

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Rule 16, Rule 16, Constitution Bench Judgment, Rule 16, Section 32A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Rule 18, the NDPS Act, Section 33, Section 27, Act No, Rule 5, Rule 17, Rule 17, Section 32A of the NDPS Act, Section 32A of the NDPS Act, Section 32A of the Act, Section 27, Section 32A, Section 3(3, 3)of Section 8, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 32A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Section 4(3, The Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Section 32A of the NDPS Act, Constitution, Rule 16, Section 32A of the NDPS Act

CARDINAL: 1, 606, 2000CriLJ4619, 13, 20, 2000CriLJ1444, 2, 17, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 4, 3, 13, 681, 1, 843.6, 27, 2, 160, 1999CriLJ1825, 433, 434, 2000CriLJ1408, two, two, 4(3, 1, 1987CriLJ1924, two, 1987)3SCC432, 1987CriLJ1888, 30, 33, 169, 1987CriLJ1924, two, two, 18, 27, 30, 33(5, 2000CriLJ1710, 169

ORG: State, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Court, State, Criminal Application No, Court, Learned Advocate, Slate of Gujarat, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, P.P., the Apex Court, Shah v. Union of India and Ors, the Apex Court, P.P., the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, under:--16, Court, LJ, Salim @ Guddu s/, LJ, the Gujarat High Court, The Jail Reforms Committee, the Statement of Objects, the Gujarat High Court, The Apex Court, Court, the Government under Sections 432, State of Hariyana, State, Haryana and Ors, State, Haryana and Ors, Haryana and Ors, State, Haryana and Ors, the Apex Court, the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release, the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release, Apex Court, Shah v. Union of India and Ors, the Apex Court, U.P., the Apex Court, State, Apex Court, the Apex Court, State, COFEPOSA, the Apex Court, the Government Orders, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, State, the Haryana Good Prisoners (Temporary Release, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Shah v. Union of India, Poonam Lata, U.P., the Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Poonam Lata, State, Shah v. Union of India, State, State, the Apex Court, the Apex Court

DATE: 1959, 1985, 2001, 18-5-2001, 1985, 1985, 1973, 1989, six months, six months, 1980, 1996, 1987, LJ 1932, 1953, 1991, 1985, 1988, 1988, 1999, 1988, 1959

PERSON: Shri Sirpurkar, Keshav Mehta v. State of, Gani v. State of, Bhikhabhai Devshi v. State, Reasons, Singh M. Rajput v. State, Mohinder Singh, Ashok Kumar, Manjeet Singh, Singh, Anr, Mehar Singh, Haryana, Anr, M. L. Wadhawan, Makhija, Haryana v. Mohinder Singh, Poonam Lata v. M. L. Wadhawan, Haryana v. Mohinder Singh, Makhija, Haryana, Nauratta Singh, Dadu, Haryana v. Mohinder Singh, Haryana, Nauratta Singh, Haryana, Nauratta Singh, Rules.14

NORP: Maharashtra, Rules, thai

GPE: Dadu, Dadu, Sunil, Sharad, Gujarat, Ishwar, Gujarat, Singh v. State of Punjab, Prisons, the Delhi Jail, Sunil, Poonam, Harish, Pushpadevi, Dadu, prayer.12, Poonam, Sunil, Harish, Pushpadevi, Sunil, Prisons

ORDINAL: first

PRODUCT: The Full Bench