National Textile Corp (Mah-north) Ltd. Vs. Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh and ors.

Decided On : Feb-18-1993

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 18-A of the Industries (Development and Regulations) Act, the Provident Fund Act, the Provident Fund Act, Section 29, Section 29, Section 5(2)(c, Section 5(2)(c, Section 5(3)(c, Section 5(2, Section 5(2)(c, Section 5(2)(c, Section 2(h, Section 4, Section 4(2, Section 4(1, Section 5(1, Section 5, Section 5(2, Section 5(3, Section 5, Section 5(2, Section 5(3)(b, Section 5, Section 5(3)(c, Section 5(2)(c, Section 5(2)(c).5, the Provident Fund Act, Provident Fund Act, Section 5(2)(c, Section 5(2)(c

PERSON: S.H. Kapadia, Nos, Controller, Controller, Controller, Affidavit, Affidavit, Controller, Dye Works, Controller

NORP: J.1, Company

ORG: National Textile Corporation, the Writ Petition, the National Textile Corporation, the Provident Fund, Sick Textile Undertaking, United Mills Nos, Controller, Mills, Mills, the Maharashtra State Textile Corporation Limited, the Sick Textile Undertaking, the Central Government, Sick Textile Undertaking, The Provident Fund Commissioner, National Textile Corporation, the Provident Fund, the Provident Fund Scheme, the Provident Fund, Provident Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, the Central Government, Ex-K, N.T.C., the Solicitor General of, the National Textile Corporation, Corporation, the National Textile Corporation, the Sick Textile Undertaking, Section 5(2)(c, the National Textile Corporation, National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, Nationalisation, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation, Affidavit, National Textile Corporation, the Sick Textile Undertaking, National Textile Corporation, Corporation, National Textile Corporation, the Provident Fund, Employees' Provident Fund Act, the Writ Petition, National Textile Corporation, Appeal, the Sick Textile Undertaking, Mills, Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, Sick Textile Undertakings, the Central Government, the Industries (Development and Regulation, the Central Government, the Sick Textile Undertaking, United India Mills, the Central Government, the Central Government, the National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, a State Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the National Textile Corporation, a State Textile Corporation, the Central Government, the Central Government, the National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, the National Textile Corporation, Court, Central Government, the National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, the National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation, National Textile Corporation, Central Government, the Provident Fund Scheme, National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation, Court, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, the National Textile Corporation, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation.4, the Central Government', the Employees* Provident Fund Scheme, Legislature, Employees Provident Fund Scheme, inter alia, Scheme, the Provident Fund, the Provident Fund, Scheme, the Provident Fund Scheme, the Provident Fund, be.7, Sick Textile Undertaking, Scheme, the Provident Fund, Provident Fund Scheme, the Provident Fund, Corporation, the Provident Fund, the Provident Fund, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Nathulal, Nathulal, National Textile Corporation, National Textile, Circular, Corporation, the Central Government, National Textile Corporation, Circular, Circular, Appeal

LOC: Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single

DATE: November 16/20, 1990, 1985, the period 1965 to 1972, April 1, 1974, the year 1965, 1951, 1971, 1972, 1972, 1972, 1974, 1974, the period 1965 to 1972, the period 1965 to 1972, January 1982, 1952, the period 1965 to 1972, April 1, 1974, May 2, 1975, April 1, 1974, 1974, 1974, 1952, 1952, 1974, 1974, 1974, 1974, 1974, April 1, 1974, November 16/20, 1990, the period 1965 to 1972, 1974, the period 1965 to 1972, 1974, 1972, 1974, 1974, April 1, of 1974, 1974, 1951, 1972, 1951, 1972, 1974, 1974, that day, 1974, the period 1965 to 1972, April 1, 1974, that day, 1952, 1952, 1952, 1952, 1952, fifteen days, Para 69, Para 72, 1974, 1965-1972, 1974, 1974, April 1, 1984, 1974, May 19, 1992, May 19, 1992, 1974, May 19, 1992

CARDINAL: 2338, 1 to 4, 1974.2, 8, 1.90, 3., 38 to 43, 1 to 5, 2, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 36, 1974.9, 5, one

GPE: Employee, India, India United Mills, Bombay, thereon

WORK_OF_ART: Scheme, Scheme, Scheme