Rangnath Banduji Salve Vs. State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Mar-12-1992

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India inter alia, Article., Article 311(2, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.4, Article 311(2, Constitution, Rule 4(4)(iv, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, the Constitution of India.6, Article 311(2, Rule 29, Rule 5, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, the Constitution of India.9, Article 311(2, the Constitution of India.(ii, Article 311(2, Rule 9, Article 311(2, Article 311 of the Constitution of India, Article 235 of the Constitution, Rule 55, Article 311, Article 311(2, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311(2, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Rule 4(4)(iv, Rule 4, Article 235 of the Constitution of India, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Regulations 17, Rule 5 of the Recruitment Rules

PERSON: S.H. Kapadia, Joint Civil Judge, Jadhav, Chandrakant Bhosale, Wavare, Osmanabad, Hashmi, Hashmi, Taklikar, Osmanabad, Osmanabad, Osmanabad, Osmanabad, Osmanabad, Osmanabad, Osmanabad, Osmanabad, Shankar Badkar, Rule 4(4)(iv, Chandrakant Bhosale, Osmanabad, Osmanabad, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Shri N.V. Saswadkar, Singhvi, Singhvi, Osmanabad, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Chougule, Chougule, Chougule, Chougule, Chougule, Singhvi, Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab, Singhvi, Samsher Singh's, Samsher Singh's, Samsher Singh, Samsher Singh, Samsher Singh, Samsher Singh's, Singhvi, C.S. Sharma, Singhvi, Singhvi, Rule, Singhvi, Singhvi, Chougule, Lal Gupta v. State, Haryana, Mani Ram, Hissar, Bassu Ram, Dal Singh, and(4, K. Lal, Brij Lal, Ram Niwas, Bishan Lal, Bishan Lal v. State, Haryana, Md. S. Ishander Ali, Veerappa R. Saboi, Art, Chougule, Lal Dhingra, Parashotam Lal Dhingra, Ram Narayan Dass, R.C. Lacy v. State of, A.G. Benjamin v. Union of India, Bench, Sukh Raj Bahadu, Chougule, Judicial Magistrates, Juvenile Court, Veerappa R. Soboji, Rule 4(2, Nariman, Dharam Singh, Beena Tiwari, Mohan Lal v. The Management of M/s. Bharat Electronics

NORP: J.1, Hindus, Hindus, Hindus

DATE: 1st August, 1980, 28th June, 1982, 8th February, 1974, the period of two years, 6th March, 1974, the period of nine weeks, 10th June, 1974, August, 20th June, 1974, May 1976, May 1980, 6th March, 1976, two years, September, 1976, six months, 8th March, 1976, 6th March, 7th April, 1976, 1st December, 1976, 5th March, 1977, September 1976, 8 months, 6th April, 1977, 30th April, 1977, 16th October, 1977, 16th April, 1980, 30th April, 1980, 1st August, 1980, 6th September, 1980, 1st August, 1980, 15th January, 1981, 28th June, 1982, 13th October, 1982, 1st August, 1980, 28th June, 22nd November, 1982, 21st August, 1987, 25th January, 1973, the 8th February, 1974, two years, 6th March, 1977, 9th May, 1977, the year 1975, August, 1975, 28th May, 1976, the same day, 1st December, 1976, 6th April, 1977, 6th April, 1977, 7th April, 1976, 7th April, 1976, 1st August, 1980, the expiry of two years, 6th March, 1977, 9th May, 1977, September, 1975, 21st June, 1976, 9th September, 1975, 1932, 1979, 1979, 12th July, 1979, 1979, 1979, 1st August, 1980, 28th June, 1982, 20th November, 1982, 30th April, 1980, 16th April, 1980, 6th April, 1977, 30th April, 1977, 1st August, 1980, Rule 55, 7th February, 1992, 8th February, 1977, 1st August, 1980, 28th June, 1982, 1956, the initial period of, two years, 1956, 1955, 1st December, 1976, 6th April, 1977, 30th April, 1997, 9th September, 1975, 9th September, 1975, 1st December, 1976, 1st December, 1976, 6th April, 1977, 1932, 1979, 1979, 1979, 30th April, 1977, 1st August, 1980, 28th June, 1982, 20th November, 1982, 20th November, 1982, February, 1992, February, 1992, 27th April, 1967, 1952, 1932, 1979, 55, 1932, 1979, the day, 8th December, 1966, 22nd October, 1968, 18th June, 1969, 1980)IILLJ155SC, one month's, one month's, 1967, ' 16, 9th September, 1975, 21st June, 1976, 18, the initial period of, two years, 6th March, 1977, May, 1977, the period of two years, 1956, the period of two years, two years, 9th September, 1975, 21st June, 1976, 9th September, 1975, 21st June, 1976, two years, 6th March, 1977, May, 1977, 1956, two years, September, 1976, 5th March, 1977, 16th April, 1980, the period of two years, 6th March, 1977, May, 1977, 1956, 1956, a period of, two years, 1956, a period of, two years, the initial period of, two years, September, 1975, 21st June, 1976, 9th September, 1975, 21st June, 1976, 1956, a period of, two years, two years, two years ', two years, two years, 1985, 6003, two years, five years, 8th December, 1973, 19th October, 1974, 240 days, one year, 2nd October, 1981, more one year, 4th September, 1982, 1975, one year, one year, one year, two years, 1975, 1956, 22nd March, 1972, two years, The period of two years, 31st March, 1975, the expiry of, two years, two years, two years, a period of, two years, two years, two years, 1956, the initial period of, two years, 6th March, 1977, May, 1977, September, 1976, 1977, 16th April, 1980, August 1980, 28th June, 1982

ORG: the State of Maharashtra, Junior Division, Judicial Magistrate, Junior Division, Judicial Magistrate, Junior Division, Judicial Magistrate, Umerga, the Government of Maharashtra, Judicial, Court, Registrar, Judicial, the Court of the petitioner., Parbhani, the Court of the petitioner, Court, the Division Bench, Court, Maharashtra Public Service Commission, C.J.J.D. & J.M.F.C., Junior Division, the Nanded Bar Association, Ausa, Complaints, Judicial, Osmanabad Shri N.V. Saswadkar, Saravashri Musande, Registrar, Bar, Bar, Court, Osmanabad Shri N.V. Saswadkar, the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Government, the Government of Maharashtra, District and Sessions, the Bombay Civil Services, the Old Civil Services Rules, the Maharashtra Civil Services, the Disciplinary Rules, the Disciplinary Rules of, the Disciplinary Rules of, the High Court, Junior Division, Judicial Magistrate, Ausea, District Osmanabad, the High Court, Bar, the High Court, Judicial, Government Services, the High Court, Government, the Government of Law and Judiciary Department Shri, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial, Probationer, the Bombay Judicial Service Recruitment Rules, the Recruitment Rules, Government, Judicial, the Recruitment Rules of, Ausa, Osmanabad Shri N.V. Saswadkar, the High Court, Government, the High Court, Judicial, Judicial, Court, Court, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, Court, the Civil Services Rules, the Maharashtra Civil Services, the Supreme Court of India, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal, the Civil Services Rules, Government, the District Judge Shri N.V. Saswadkar, Court, the High Court, Judicial, Government, Judicial, Government, Bar, Government, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Government, Government, Government, Court, Court, Government, the Supreme Court, Punjab Judicial Services, the Punjab Civil Services (, Judicial Officers, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, U.P., the Supreme Court, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, the New Rules, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Anoop Jaiswal v. Government of India, Anoop Jaiswal, the Supreme Court, the Indian Police Services, Hyderabad, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Case of Bishan, Haryana Civil Services, Judicial Branch, under:'(1, Hissar;(2, the Station House Officer, Police Station Yamuna Nagar, Jagadhri;(3, Bassu Ram, Sarvashri Shri Ram Hande, the High Court, The High Court, the Supreme Court, Government, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Oil and Natural Gas Commission, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, The Supreme Court, the High Court, Government, Government, Court, Government, Government, Court, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, State, U.P., Kaushal Kishore Shukla, the Supreme Court, Court, Union of India, Court, Court, Court, Court, Dhingra, Court, State, Orissa, C.A. No, Champaklal Chimanlal, Shah v. Union of India, Jagdish Mitter v. Union of India, State, Government, Court, Court, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, Bar, Government, Government, the Circular of the Government, Government, the Bombay Judicial Service Recruitment Rules, Government, the Resolution of the Government, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Recruitment Rules, Government, the Supreme Court, the Bombay Judicial Service Recruitment Rules, Junior Division, Judicial Magistrate, the Junior Branch, the Civil Judges, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrates, the Judges of the Small Causes Court, Metropolitan Magistrates, Metropolitan Magistrates, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrates, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrates, Civil Judges, Junior Division, Judicial Magistrate, the Recruitment Rules, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, the Bombay Judicial Service Recruitment Rules, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Junior Branch, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, Government, Government, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Smt, State of, Madhya Pradesh, Subordinate Judicial Service, the High Court, the Subordinate Judicial Service, Kedar Nath Bahi, The State of Punjab, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Bharat Electronics, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, U.P. Co-operative, Sugar Factories Federation, the High Court, The High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Societies Employees Service, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Societies Employees Service Regulations, the Bombay Judicial Service Recruitment Rules, Civil Judges, Junior Division, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Bombay Judicial Service Recruitment Rules, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, Government

CARDINAL: 2., one, one, 21, 189, 3, 3, nine, 6, 311(2, one, 21, two, 155, 5, two, 8, 55, 1974)IILLJ465SC, 3, 4, one, 85, 1969)ILLJ509SC, 55, only one, 11-9-1969, one, 1978)ILLJ316SC, 13, 14, 10, 311(2, two, one, 311(2, three, one, one, 16, 16, 15, two, 1, 2, 1961)ILLJ552SC, 590/62, 23-10-1963, 1964)ILLJ752SC, 1964)ILLJ418SC, 718, 1974)IILLJ465SC, three, 17, 19, 20, 4, 4(2, 4(3, 4(3B, 4(4)(i, 4(4)(iv, two, two, 21, 1, 2, two, 2, 2, 1968]3SCR1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1986)IILLJ145SC, 18, 17, 17, One, 22, 4(4)(iv, 24

GPE: Osmanabad, Nanded, J.M.F.C., India, Counsel, Counsel, India, Singh, the District Judges, services.12, Subordinate, Art, Art, Bihar, Singh v. State of Punjab, Government, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Gujarat, A.I.R., Dhanjibhai, Dhanjibhai, Ramjibhai

ORDINAL: 9th, 9th, 9th, Firstly, second, first, 7th, 7th, Firstly, Secondly, Secondly, Firstly, Secondly, second, 9th, 9th, 9th, 9th, Secondly, 9th, first, first, first, second, Secondly, Thirdly, second, 9th, 9th, 5th, 1st

LOC: Single Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, District, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, Chandigadh

WORK_OF_ART: Criminal Case No, the Constitution of India, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India

PRODUCT: Rule 4(4)(iv, Jaiswal, Rule 4(4)(iv, Rule 4(4)(iv, Rule 4(4)(iv

FAC: Ishwar Chand Agrawal, the Sardar Vallabhai Patel National Police Academy, Resolution

EVENT: 4th September, 1982, Regulation 17