Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S. Charkop Priya Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. Vs. M/S. Trade Well Constructions

Decided On : Sep-15-1998

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Partnership Act, section 69, the Indian Partnership Act, Shri M.D. Tambekar, section 69, section 69, the Partnership Act, section 69, the Indian Arbitration Act, section 20, the Arbitration Act, section 69, the Partnership Act, section 20, section 69, section 69(3, the Indian Partnership Act, section 69, section 69

CARDINAL: ORDERF.I., 2, 3, 13, 7, 9, 1, 3., 1996.5, 1, 1, 1964]8SCR50, 3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1995]1SCR168, one, 3, 69, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4.4, 2, 3, 13, 4.4, 4.4, 2, 3, 1,88,131.60, 2,33,662.33, Three, 13, 13, 4.4.(b, 4.4, 5, 7, 9, 2, 1, 3, 45,530.72, 13, 50,000.00, 3, 13

NORP: J.1, Rates, Tender

DATE: 20th December, 1995, 25th December, 1995, 14-8-1989, 8, 16, 28th March, 1988, 56 weeks, 24th April, 1989, 31st July, 1989, 31st January, 1990, 18th January, 1990, February, 1990, 16th June, 1990, 16th February, 1990, 18th February, 1990, 21st February, 1990, 9th March, 1990, 15th March, 1990, 1st June, 1990, 21st June, 1990, 9th July, 1990, 20th December, 1995, 10th April, 1996, 9th July, the year 1996, 19th October, 1996, 19th October, 1996, 1st April, 1986, 58, 8

ORG: Arbitrators, Court, Arbitrators, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, the State of Maharashtra, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Clauses 3.3, Court, Consultants, Consultants, Consultants, Consultants, Arbitrators, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Chandra Gupta.v, Kajaria Traders India Ltd., Apex Court, The Apex Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Partnership for Arbitration, The Apex Court, Smt, the Allahabad High Court, Court, Court, the Allahabad High Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Clauses 2.6.1, General Conditions, Consulting Engineer, Clause, Consulting Engineer, Consulting Engineer, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Consulting Engineer, the Consulting Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Clauses this Court, Clauses, Clauses 2.6.2.In, Tribunal, The Consulting Engineer, The Clauses of the contract, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Consulting Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, The Consulting Engineer, Tribunal, the Conditions of Contract the Contract Price, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Consulting Engineer, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Tribunal

PERSON: Award, Nos, Award, Bill No, Award, Award, Award, Award, Meghraj Sampatlall v. Raghunath, Son, Prem Lata, Ishar Dass, Chaman Lal, Rampa Devi, Bishambhar Nath Puri, Iqbal Singh, Ram Narain, Chandra Gupta, Bill, Contractor, Bill, Award, Rs, Contractor, Award

PRODUCT: Consultant, Calcutta, Consultant, Award

QUANTITY: 4.4 b.

ORDINAL: 7th, first, first, first, first, second, 15th, second

GPE: Jagdish, Jagdish, rejected.10

PERCENT: 15%, 9%

WORK_OF_ART: the Award of the Arbitrator, The Award of the Tribunal

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //