Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hawaldar (Clerk) Baidyanath Giri Vs. Chief of Army Staff, Indian Army and anr.

Decided On : Mar-08-1989

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Army Act, section 114, section 153, section 164(2, the Army Act, Section 64 of the Act, section 114, the Indian Penal Code, section 155, Rule 25, Rule 33, Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21, section 130

PERSON: V.A. Mohta, Baidyanath Giri, Hawaldar Clerk, Shri Trivedi, Shri Darda, Dutta, Dutta, Court-, Court Martial, xUnder Rule 95, Civil

NORP: J.1, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules

ORG: Army Service, Kaushal Kishor, the Army Rules, the District Court Martial, The District Court Martial, The Brigadier Commandant, Brigade of the Guards, Regimental Centre, Army, the The Siemens Engineering, The Union of India, Army, Som Datt v. Union of India, the Central Government, the Court Martial, the Central Government, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, District Court Martial, the Court Martial, the Central Government, Army, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Army Service, the Supreme Court, Harish Uppal v. Union of India, point:'To, Court, Armed Personnel, Court, Judicial, Reliance, Thakur v. Union of India, Kaushal Kishor

DATE: 1965, 1979, 12th December, 1987, 1950, between 6th May and 18th May, 1986, 1954, six months, 12th April, 1988, 12th September, 1988, '64, 77, 1983, S.C. 1413

CARDINAL: 10,000/-, one, Two, 1969CriLJ663, 164, 193, 228, 480, 482, 1, 2, 22, 23, 24, 60, 61, 62, 80, 80(1, 182, 1973]2SCR1025, 1988CriLJ158

ORDINAL: second

GPE: x(e, Counsel

WORK_OF_ART: Court.(2

FAC: Prithi Pal Singh v. Union of India A.I.R.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //