Shri Balasaheb Dhondiram Jagdale and Shri Jaysingh mahadeo Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Decided On : May-06-2008

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 371 of the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, Article 371(2, Article 371(2, the Constitution of India.6, Article 371(2, Article 371(2, the Constitution of India.10, Article 371(2, Article 371(2, Article 371, Article 371 Special, Constitution, Article 371, Article 371 of the Constitution of India, Article 199,200,202, Constitutional, article 203, Article 199, Article 200, the Money Bill, Article 371, Article 371, Constitution, Article 371, Rule 7(4, Article 371(2, Article 371(2)(b, Article 371(2, the 7th Amendment Act, Constitution, Article 371(2, Constitution, Article 202(3)(f, Article 202(2)(a, Article 202(2)(b).ii, Article 371(2, Article 202(2)(a, Article 204, Article 202, Article 371(2, Article 154, Article 154, Article 162, Article 154, Article 162, Article 371(2, Article 162, Article 202(3)(f, an Appropriation Act, Article 371(2, Article 154, Article 162, Article 202(3)(f, Article 372(2, Constitution, Article 371(2, Article 13, Article 266(3, Article 371(2, Article 371(2, Constitution, Article, Constitution, Article 239(2, Article 356, Constitution, Article 200, Constitution, Article 200, the Constitution of India, Article 371(2, Article 202(2)(a, Article 204.He, Article 202(2)(b, Article 204.The, Article 202(3)(f, Constitution, Article 371(2, Article 154 of the Constitution, Article 154, Article 162, Article 154, Article 162, Article 202(3)(f, Article 13, Article 266(3, Constitution, the Krishna Award, Article 371, Constitution, Article 371(2, Article 371(2, Constitution, Article 202 and 203, Constitution, Article 202 and 203, Article 371, Constitution, Constitution, Article 202, Constitution, Article 202(3)(a, Constitution, Article 371 of the Constitution, Constitution, Rule 8, Article 371, Article 371 of the Constitution of India, Article 371.iii, Article 371(2, Constitution, Article 371(2, Article 371, Article 202, The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court, Constitution, Article 371-F(f, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 371-F, Article 371-F, Article 332(3, Article 371-F, Article 371-D in the Constitution by the 32nd Amendment, Article 371-D, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, the Doctrine of Basic Structure, Article 371-D(3, Article 371-D, Article 371-D, Article, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 371-D, Chapter V of Part VI of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 371-F, Constitution, Article of Part III, Constitution, Article 371(2, Article 202, Article 371(2, Article 202(3)(f, Article 202(3, Article 371 of the Constitution of India.ii, Article 371 of the Constitution of India, Article 371(2, Article 202(2).ii, Article 202(3)(f, Constitution, Article 202(3)(f, Article 202(3)(f, Article 371, Article 202(3)(f, Article 371(2, Article 154, Article 371(2, the Constitution of India.v, Article 371, Article 154, Article 371(2, Article 154, Article 13 and Article 266(3, Article 13, Article 13(3)(a, Article 13(3)(a, Article 266(3).25, Article 371(2, Article 371-F(f, Constitutional, Article 371(2).(d, Article 202(2, Article 371(2, Article 202(3)(f).We, Article 371(2, Article 154 of the Constitution of India, Article 371(2, Article 371, Article 154, Article 371, Article 371(2

PERSON: S. Radhakrishnan, Fazal Ali, Fazal Ali, Gujurat, Vidharbha, Nagpur, Vidharbha, V.M Dandekar, Demands, PIL Nos, Nagpur, taken.22, Challenges, Legislature.iii, Appropriation Bill, Appropriation Bill, Bill, Order, etc.ii, B. Sadashivrao Abaji Pol v. State, wherein, Nagpur, Baburao T. Deshmukh, Aney, Aney, Directives, Aney, Aney, Order, Aney, Directives, Aney, Nagpur, Aney, C. Surekha, Sikkim, Devendra Prasad, Waman Rao v., Aney, Aney, Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab, Articles 371-A(1)(b, Bill, Aney, Keshavananda Bharti, Aney, Aney, Francis Sannon's, Aney, Statutes, Aney, Aney, Directives, Law, Directives, Submissions, Anturkar, Krishna Project, Rule, V.A. Thorat, V.A. Thorat, Anturkar, Ravi Kadam, Anturkar, MLA, MLA, Kadam, Ravi Kadam, Ravi Kadam, Nos, Articles 371-A, Sikkim, Sikkim, Sikkim, Jain, Andhra Pradesh, Choudhary, P. Sambamurthy v. State, Sambamurthy, Court, Sambamurthy, Surendra Prasad Sharma, Waman Rao, Articles 146(3, Aney, Ravi Kadam, Sikkim, Aney

NORP: J.1, Western Maharashtra, Sanyukta, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Western Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Western Maharashtra, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Maharashtra, Western Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Hon'ble, Paragraph, Statute, Statute, Statute, Hon'ble, Directives, democratic, democratic, democratic, egalitarian, Maharashtra, Maharashtra

ORG: the State of Maharashtra, Vidharbha, Vidharbha, Madhya Pradesh, Vidharbha, Madhya Pradesh Legislature, the Sanyukta Maharashtra Movement, Vidharbha, Akola, Vidharbha, Madhya Pradesh, Vidharbha, Marathwada, Marathi, the 'Nagpur act', Vidharbha, Nagpur, State, Vidharbha, State, the Legislative Assembly, Maharashtra, Regional Imbalances', etc.7, Committee, theVidharbha, the Dandekar Committee, the Government of Maharashtra, Government, the State Assembly, State, Vidharbha, Development Boards, Vidharbha, Marathwada, Sub, Maharashtra formed the Development Boards, Backlog Committee, State, the three Development Boards, Maharashtra, The Forum For Removal of Backlog and Development(Legislative Branch, the State Government, the Presidential Order, the Development Board, Vidharbha, Marathwada, Maharashtra Order, House, Maharashtra, the Development Board Order, House, The Learned Advocate, Government, Government, Advocate General Opined, the Development Boards, Marathwada, Rest of Maharashtra) Order, the State of Maharashtra, The State of Vidarbha, Berar, the Central Provinces, Akola, the Unified Maharashtra Movement, the State of Maharashtra, Saurashtra, Kutch, the State Legislative Assembly;(b, State, State, State, the State of Maharashtra (Special Responsibility of Governor, Marathwada, Rest of Maharashtra, Maharashtra, the Development Boards, Marathwada, Rest of Maharashtra) Order, Order, Order, the Dandekar Committee for Regional Imbalance, the Dandekar Committee, Marathwada, Maharashtra, the Government of Maharashtra, Backlog Committee, Backlog Committee, Backlog Committee, the State Departments, Irrigation, Higher and Technical Education, Land Development, the Appropriation Bill, the State Legislature, Petitioners, the State Legislature, the State Legislature, State, Legislature, Legislature, the Legislative Assembly, the Consolidated Fund of the State of, the Consolidated Fund of the State, Statement, House, Houses, Petitioners, the Consolidated Fund of the State, the State Legislature, Petitioners, the State Legislature, the Money Bill, the State Legislature, Order, the Development Board Rules, the Planning Department, Rest of Maharashtra region.iii, the Planning Department, the State Government, Budget, the Development Expenditure, the Development Expenditure, the State Government, Vidharbha, Marathwada, W.P. No, Directives, Backlog Committee, Directives, the State Of Maharashtra, Nagpur, Development Expenditure, State, State, Directives, Rest of Maharashtra, Directives, the Irrigation Department, PIL No, the Krishna Valley Project, State, the Development Board, the Planning Department, Marathwada, Backlog Committee, Marathwada, State, C. Anilrao Kaljierao Babar, Anr, Union of India, the State Government, the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, MVKDC, Court, the Legislative Assembly, MVKDC, MKVDC, MKVDC, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, the Consolidated Fund, Consolidated Fund, the Consolidated Fund, Development Boards, Akola, Nagpur Pacts, the State Legislature, the Fazal Ali Commission Report, the Dandekar Committee's Report, Backlog Committee Report, the Consolidated Fund, the Consolidated Fund, State, State, the State Legislature, the State Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, State, the Legislature itself.v, the Consolidated Fund, Clauses 7, Directives, the Consolidated Fund of the State, Constitution.vii, the Krishna Project, Akola Pact, Legislature, State, R.C.Pandyal v. Union of India, Union of India, Union of India, Advocate General, South India Corporation, the Supreme Court, Union Territory, Council of Ministers, State, the Government of the State, the High Court, the High Court, the Council of Ministers, State, State, the Constitutionality of the Statute, magris valveat guam periat', National Insurance, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Statute, BBC, Court, Parliament, Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd., the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Courts, magris valveat guam periat, Court, Statute, Court, Statute, Nokes, Court, Parliament, Counsel for the Petitioners, State, the Consolidated Fund of the State, the Consolidated Fund, the Consolidated Fund, the Consolidated Fund, the Learned Counsel, State, Directives, Executive, State, the State Legislature, Directives under Article 371(2, the State Legislature, Legislature, Counsel, the Krishna Project, State, State, State, State, State, State, the Learned Advocate, Directives, House, State, the State Legislature, Legislature, the Legislature of the State by Law, Bombay Expenditure Act, State, the Development Board Rules, State, State, Counsel, the Krishna Project, State, the Inter-State Water Tribunal, State, Project, the State of Maharashtra:, Advocate General, the Legislative Supremacy, Advocate General, Maharashtra, Vidharbha, Marathwada, Directives, Advocate General, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, the 'Basic Structure, R.C. Poudyal v. Union of India, State of Nagaland, Sugar Industries Ltd., Court, Legislature, v. Union of India : AIR1989SC44, Scheme, Court, the State of Andhra Pradesh, Court, Minerva Mills Ltd., Union of India, S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India, Administrative Tribunal, the State Government, the State Government, Court, Parliament, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, Advocate General, the Consolidated Fund, Advocate General, Marathwada, Legislature, issue.i, the Consolidated Fund of the State, Court, the Consolidated Fund, the Consolidated Fund, State, State, State, the 'Basic Structure, Advocate General, the 'Basic Structure Doctrine', the Supreme Court, R.C. Poudyal v. Union of India, Legislature, operative.27, State, State, State, Marathwada, Marathwada, Vidharbha, Marathwada, Vidharbha, the Development Board Rules, Krishna Valley Water Project, Vidharbha, Marathwada, State

GPE: Bombay, India, Independence, Bombay, Bombay, Marathwada, India, Vidhrabha, Marathwada, Vidharbha, Marathwada, Rest of Maharashtra, Legislature.16, Vidarbha, Vidarbha, Marathwada, Vidarbha, Vidarbha, Vidarbha, the States of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Gujarat, Vidarbha, Marathwada, Gujarat, Vidarbha, Vidarbha, Backlog, Vidarbha, Vidarbha, Marathwada, Vidarbha, Marathwada, Governor.ix, W.P, Marathwada, Vidarbha, Marathwada, Vidarbha, Backlog, Vidarbha, W.P, Bombay, Bombay, India, Articles, Articles, Kerala, Counsel, India, India, India, Sampat, Clause, Sikkim, Clauses, Vidarbha, Vidharbha

CARDINAL: 1953.3, 7, 8, 1994.12, 4685, 28.9.1953, 2, 18, 9.3.1994, 1.05.1994, 30.04.1984, 30.6.1982, 74, 27.9.2000, 14, 12.3.2003, 15.12.2001, 12.03.2003, 4, 203, 204, 205, 206, 371(2)ii, 548, four, 5, 9, 7(5).Rule 7(4, 5, 6671, 2006The, 10%The, one, one, 74, 7(5)(vii, 62, 63, three, 1041.90, 2)(b, 8, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1964]4SCR280, 1974)IILLJ465SC, 18(3, 371, 371, 2, 371, 2, 56, 118, 3, two, four, 203, 3, 1, 2, 3, three, 203, 1993]1SCR891, 126, 127, 128, 130, 133, 134, 135, 126, one, one, 332(3, 333, 239, 240, 127, 128, one, 130, 134, 135, 4, 1981]1SCR206, 1985)4SCC458, 5, 5, 10, 10, 1994)IILLJ1220SC, 1981]2SCR1, 203, three, 24, 148(6, 229(3, 273(1

DATE: 1955.However, the year 1956.5, the period between 1956-1960, the year 1960, the year 1984, 10 years, 1994, March 1994, 1994, 1995, 2001, 2476, the year 2003, Annual, 2003-04, 2004, 1994, 2004-05, Annual, 2005-06, 1942, 2005-06.15, the year 2006-07, 2480, 1994, 5871, 5872, 2751, 2757, 2006, 62, 63, 2003, 8.8. 1947, 1956, each year, 26.7.1989, annual, annual, 2003, 1995, 11.07.1997, 5872, 2003, 15.12.2001, 2476, 2751, the year 2003-2004.Submissions, 2751, 2006, Annual, 1041, 199(1)(d, 1994, 2006, 1994, the subsequent year, a month, the subsequent year, 15.12.2001 and, 12.03.2003, 2001, 1994, the last two years, 2002-03, 2005-2006, 5872, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2004-05, 2005-06, annual, 17.03.2005, 1942, 20.3.2005, 2006, 1956, Annual, 54, 56, 1990, 1940, Annual, Annual, the year 2000, any subsequent year, March 1994, 30th May 2000, 1964]52ITR443(SC, July 26, 1984, July 1, 1974, 90 days

ORDINAL: seventh, 9th, First, first, first, 5th, 5th, Sixth, fourth, third, first, 9th, second, first, fourth, second, first, fourth, first, second, third, fourth, fifth

EVENT: the Constitution of India

PERCENT: 38%, 22.85%, 39%, 47%, 28%, 23%, 55%, 32.37%, 12.59%, a mere 21%, 39.12%, 28.56%, 37.32%, 38%, 22.85%, 39.10%, 55.04%, 32.37%, 12.59%, 40%, 18.44 %, 11.89%, 38 percent, 20 percent

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, Articles of the Constitution, the Constitution of India, State of Assam, 'Basic Structure, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India

PRODUCT: Marashtra, Articles, Krishna, Rule 8

QUANTITY: 006.77 crores.23

LOC: Northern Maharashtra, Northern Maharashtra, Supplementary, the Northern Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Krishna River

MONEY: Constitutional Provisions(article 200

FAC: the Krishna Award, Constitutional