Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Nagesh Devidas Kulkarni

Decided On : Apr-09-2007

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 260A, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 143(1, Section 148, Section 143(3, Section 147, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C, Section 17(3, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 260A of the Act.8, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 3, the Finance Act, Section 89 Relief, Section 17, Section 89, the Finance Act, Section 17, Section 57, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 89(1, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C, the Finance Act, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, The Finance Act, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 80CCC, Section 88, Section 10(10C, Section 89(1, Section 89(1, Section 10(10C).17, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 89, Section 89, the Finance Act, Section 89, Section 89, Section 17(3, Section 17(3, Section 10, Section 10, Section 17, Section 10, Section 17(1)(iv, Section 17(3)(ii, Section 10, Section 89, Section 17(3, Section 17(3, Section 17(3, Section 17(3, Section 89, Section 17(3)(ii, Section 10, Section 10(10C, Section 17(3)(ii, Section 17(3, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 89

PERSON: J.P. Devadhar, Parchure, Parchure, Parchure, Mani, Salary, Salary, Mani, Mani, Salary, Keyman, Counsel, Webster, Counsel, Mani, Dewani, Shri K.P. Dewani

NORP: J.1, person.22

CARDINAL: 66, 40, 26, 3, 12, 12, 12, 10,28,296, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, two, two, 5,00,000, one, one, 5,00,000, 2005]273ITR307(Mad, 2006]282ITR587(Ker, 2005]279ITR402(KAR, 1999]236ITR403(Bom, five, one, 3, 3, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 14, five, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 2005]273ITR307(Mad, 657, 204, 106, 16, 16.3, five hundred thousand, five, 21AA, 10, 10A, 11, 12, 13, 10D, 2000)IILLJ603SC, 150):In, 10, 10A, 11, 12, 13, one, 3)(ii, 10, 10A, 11, 12, 13, (13A, 5,00,000, 5,00,000, 10, 10A, 11, 12, 13, (13A, 5,00,000

DATE: 1961, 1961, 2007, 2007, the financial year, year 2002-03, the assessment year 2002-03, 1961, more than twelve months, a previous year, or(iii, 1956, 3 of 1956, 1961, 59 of 1961, 2002, more than twelve months, 2002, 1st April, 1996, one financial year, more than twelve months, August 30, 1993, 1993, 1993, 2002, 1st April, 1996, any financial year, 21B, 1962, 16, Section 17(3

ORG: Tribunal, Tribunal, Nagesh Kulkarni, the Central Bank of India, Assessing, VRS, Assessing, Tribunal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals, Tribunal, Assessing, Tribunal, High Courts, Tribunal, CIT, G.V. Venugopal, State Bank of Travancore v. CBDT, CIT, J.K. Helene Curtis Ltd., CIT, Central, Central, the University Grants Commission Act, Indian Institute of Technology, the Institutes of Technology Act, State Government, the Central Government, State, the Central Government, the Central Government, Institutes, inter alia, Assessing, Assessing, G.V. Venugopal, the Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular, Board, Board, Act.18, Keyman, Karamchari Union v. Union of India, Act, Legislature, Clauses, Legislature, Act, Tribunal, Act

ORDINAL: second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second

GPE: India, States, assessee, Clause, Clause, Counsel, Clauses

FAC: the Official Gazette, the Official Gazette, Sections 15

PRODUCT: Act inter, Act inter