Shri Manjit Singh S/O Moolsingh Sethi Vs. Maharashtra Assembly, Maharashtra Legislative Assembly and the Honourable Speaker, Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly

Decided On : Jul-04-2006

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Rule 272, the Right to Information Act, the Evidence Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 212 of the Constitution of India, Article 19(1)(A, Article of the Constitution of India, Article 21, Article 212, Article 208 of the Constitution of India, Article 208 of the Constitution of India, Article 194, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Article 226 of the of India?(iv, Article 143(1, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226, Article 212 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226, Article 226, Article 12 defines the 'State', Article 226(1, Article 226(1, Article 32, Article 226(1, Constitution, Article 226, Article 226(1, Article 226 and Article 32, Article 21, Article 194(3, Article 21, Article 105, Article 194, Article 194, Article 105, Article 105, Article the questions, Article 194(3, Article 194(3, the Indian Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 194(3, Article 19(1)(a, Article 194, Article 141, Article 194(3, Article 208, Article, Article 194(3, Article of the Constitution of India, Article 19(1)(a, Article 21, Article 22, Article 194(3, Article 20, Article 21, Article 20, Article 20 or Article 21, Article 32, Article 21, Article 21, Article on the construction of the latter part, Article 21, Constitution, Article 208(1).24, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 22(1, Constitution, Article 208(1, Article 22(1, Rule 74, Article 22(1, Rule 76, Article 194(3, Rule 76, Rule 76, Section 3 of the Prisoners Act, 1900, Section 3, Article 194(3, the Full Bench, Article 212 of the Constitution of India, Article 212, Constitution, Article, Article 208, the Civil Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Evidence Act, the Advocates Act, Section 30, the Advocates Act, Section 30, the Advocates Act, Section 30, Section 14(1)(a, the Bar Councils Act, Section 9, Section 9A of the Act, Article 208, Article 208, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Full Bench Judgment of the Madras High Court, Article 208 of the Constitution, Article 212 of the Constitution, Article 32 of the Constitution., Article 32 of the Constitution:, Article 194(1, Article 194(1, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the Right to Information Act, Article 21, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Constitutional

PERSON: V.M. Kanade, Sudhir Mungantiwar, Shri Sudhir, Dance Bar Girls, Shri Patil, Shri Ravi Kadam, M.S.M. Sharma, Sri Krishna Sinha and, Bench, M.S.M. Sharma, Shri Ravi Kadam, Keshav Singh v., M.S. Sharma v. Shri Krishna Sinha, A.M. Allison v. B.L. Sen, K.A. Mathialagan v. P. Srinivasan, Lingappa P. Appealwar v. State of, Keshav Singh v., A.M. Paulraj v. The, Madras, Anr, M.S.M. Sharma V. Sri Krishna Sinha, Keshav Singh, Keshav Singh, Articles 105, Babasaheb Ambedkar, Ambedkar, Ambedkar, Ambedkar, May, M.S.M. Sharma, Sri Krishna Sinha and, Keshav Singh's, Judicature, Seervai, Seervai, Reference, M.S.M. Sharma, Keshav Singh's, M.M. Sharma's, Subbarao, J., N. Ravi's, Keshavsingh, M.S.M. Sharma's, M.S. Sharma's, Keshav Singh's, Keshav Singh, Counsel, Counsel, Lucknow, Articles, Shri R.R. Patil, Anr, K. A. Mathialagan v. P. Srinivasan, Hood Philips, Anr, Reg, M.S.M. Sharma, Shree Krishna Sinha, Janardan Reddy v. State, M.S.M. Sharma, Sri Krishna Sinha and, Erskine May, Atkin, Andre Paul V. Attorney-General, Atkin, Shri Ravi Kadam

DATE: 11th/12th April 2006, 90 days, daily, 31/3/2005, 6/6/2005.4, daily, daily, 6/9/2005, 26/10/2005, 90 days, 12/4/2006, 21/6/2006, Monday, 26/6/2006, 28/6/2006, 1965, 28th/29th April 1999, 2224, 1999, 1957)ILLJ472SC, 1977, May, May, May, 76, 1961, the last years, 1926, Para 19, august, Para 13, 1936

WORK_OF_ART: this Writ Petition, 'Wives of the Ministers, Shri Iqbal Chagla, the Constitution of India, Constitutional and Administrative Law' 3rd Edn, the Constitution of India, Treatise on The Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament, Judicature

GPE: India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Sakal, Sakal, Sakal, Sakal, Keshavsingh, Ramjee, India, Counsel, Keshavsingh, India, Re Delhi's, Sharma, Lucknow, the District Jail, Sakal, Sakal, Ramjee, Counsel, Keshavsingh, Trinidad, Keshavsingh, Counsel

ORG: Fight for Right Bar Owners' Association, the Government of Maharashtra, the Dance Bars, the Dance Bar Girls Association, State, Legislative Assembly Chandrapur, the Special Privilege Committee, the Maharashtra Legislative Rules, The Privilege Committee, the Privilege Committee, The Privilege Committee, Dance Bar, House, House, House, Shri Manjit, The Privilege Committee, on.7, The Privilege Committee, Assembly, House, House, the Privilege Committee, the Legislative Assembly, the Maharashtra Legislative Secretariat, the Privilege Committee, the Privilege Committee, D.G. Deshpande, S.A. Bobde, the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, Court, Advocate General Shri Ravi Kadam, the Privilege Committee, the Privilege Committee, the Privilege Committee, the Privilege Committee, the Writ Petition, House, Court, the Supreme Court, AIR1959SC395, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India & Anr, AIR 2006 SCW 49412, the Writ Petition, the Legislative Assembly, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, SC, Court, Court, Court, Assembly, the Privilege Committee, Assembly, House, Court, House, the Legislative Assembly, Legislature, the Privilege Committee, the Court of law, Kaul & Shakdhar's, 5th Edition, Erskine May's, A.C. Agarwal, D.K. Deshmukh, Dnyandeo, Maharashtra State Assembly, Legislative Assembly, AIR 1965, Yashwantrao Meghawale v. M.P. Legislative Assembly and Ors, Board of Mining Examination, SC, Pradip Port Trust, Advocate General Shri Ravi Kadam, Court, House, Assembly, Court, Court, Court, House, The Supreme Court, the High Court, House, the Supreme Court, U.P. State Legislative Assembly, AIR 1965, SC, the Supreme Court, High Courts, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, Court, Legislature, Court, Legislature, the Supreme Court, AIR1959SC395, the Committee of Privileges, Court, The Supreme Court, the High Courts, Legislature, State, the High Court, Legislature, the High Court, House, the High Court, House, Court, Court, the High Court, House, the High Court, House, House, the High Court, House, House, the High Court, House, the High Court, Court, Uttar Pradesh, the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly, House, Court, the High Court, the High Court, House, Parliament, Privileges, the State Assembly, the Constituent Assembly, House, House, House, House, the House of Commons, Parliament, the State Assembly, K. Anbazhagan and Ors, The Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, AIR1988Mad275, Court, Parliament, the House of Commons, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Committee, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, House, Parliament, Parliament, the House of Commons, the House of Commons I, the Drafting Committee, Court, House, the Supreme Court, Court, House, The Supreme Court, Legislature, House, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Legislature, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Legislative Assembly, The Bihar Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly, the House of Commons, Fundamental Right under Article 21, Court, the High Court, The High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, under:127, Court, Court, Court, Court, AIR1959SC395, Court, House, House, the Division Bench, Court, Dnyandeo Ingale, the Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly, Court, the Legislative Assembly, The Legislative Assembly, the U.P. Legislative Assembly, House, House, Committee, Committee, House, House, the Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly, the House of Commons, the House of Commons, the Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly, Court, Court, the House of Commons, the Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly, the Supreme Court, the Judgment of the Division Bench, Court, the High Court, the High Court, House, House, the Legislature of a State, the Legislature of a State, Legislature, House, House, the Privilege Committee, this Writ Petition, Committee, the Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat, Committee, House, Committee, Committee, the Committee of Privileges, Committee, Committee, the Maharasthra State Assembly, the State Legislature, the Privilege Committee, House, Hon'ble Home, Executive Function, House, House, the Privilege Committee, the Privilege Committee, The Supreme Court, Bar, sub-s, the High Court, and(b, Court, Tribunal, the Privilege Committee, the Privilege Committee, House, Privilege Motion, House, House, House, House, Committee, Committee, the Breach of Privilege Committee, the Privilege Committee, The Legislative Assembly, State, Assembly, Parliament, B.W. Ridges, House, House, House, House, House, House, House, Assembly, the House of Commons, House, Commons, the Supreme Court, Board of Mining and, Board, the Regional Inspector, the Regional Inspector, the House of the Legislature, Court, Court, State, Legislature, Committee, Legislature, Legislature, Court, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, AIR1959SC395, the Legislative Assembly of Bihar, House, House, Committee of Privileges, House, Press, House, House, House, House, Twentieth Edition, the House of the Assembly, House, Hon'ble Home, House, the Privilege Committee, The Privilege Committee, House, House, Court, the Privilege Committee, House, Court, the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, the Privilege Committee, Subhash Mungantiwar, Committee, Subhash Mungantiwar, Committee, Counsel of the petitioner, Court, Court, House, Court, Court, Court, House, the Supreme Court, Justice, the Learned Advocate General, Legislature, State, Legislature, Legislature, Nation, Government, the Advocate General Shri Ravi Kadam, Court

CARDINAL: 31/3/2005, One, 25/4/2005, four, 4, two, 1, 2, one, 7, 1, 1961]1SCR96, 1976)IILLJ409SC, 25, four, 194, two, 61, one, three, 8, 9, less than twenty five, twenty five, one, 2005)1SCC603, 1951]2SCR747, 29, 1961]1SCR96, 127, 194(3, 17, 18, 74, two, 76, 4, 3, one, 26, 277, 284, 34, 4, 2, two, 176, one, Two, 184, 1977]2SCR904, one, 26, 1961]1SCR96, two, 1951]2SCR344, 34, 33, 142, One, 141, two, two

NORP: Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Rules, Hon'ble, Rules, Rules, Indian, Hon'ble, Rules, Rules, Rules, Organs, Organs

PRODUCT: Bench, Bench, 745.13, 965, 765, Articles, M.S.M. Sharma(supra, Judgment, Constitutional, Para 10 of the Judgment of the Supreme Court

ORDINAL: first, 44th, third, first, second, fourth, first, first, firstly, Secondly, third, Secondly

LOC: Madras, Superintendent, the District Jail, Superintendent

PERCENT: 7 Judges'

FAC: Subhash Mungantiwar, Lingappa Pochanna Appealwar v. State of, Subhash Mungantiwar