Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. Kasargod Devidas Rao and ors.

Decided On : Aug-21-1989

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Companies Act, Rule 7(1, the Gratuity Act, section 2(a)(ii, section 2(a)(i, section 2(4, section 2(a)(i, section 2(a)(ii, section 2(a)(i, section 2(a)(ii, section 2(a)(ii, section 3 of the Act, the Gratuity Act, Article 136.13, the Gratuity Act

PERSON: M.L. Dudhat, J.1, Daman, Shrikrishna, Nos, J. Satagopan, Madras, Nos, Nos

DATE: 30th of October, 1982, 1982, 1972, 31st March, 1982, 1948, 1942, 1st October, 1980, 38 years, 16th of March,, 1981, May, 1981, 1972, 14th May, 1981, 11th of June, 1981, May, 1981, August, 17th September, 1981, the same day i.e. on 17th September, 1981, 23rd December, 1982, 30th October, 1982, 1972, 1948, annual, 1929, 1979)IILLJ163Mad, one day, monthly, 22 days, 26 day, monthly, 22 days, 22 days, Saturdays, Sundays, 1980)IILLJ252SC, 1980)IILLJ252SC, para 5, monthly, 22 days, 26 days, '12, monthly, 30 days, 26 days, monthly, 22 days, 26 days, daily, monthly, 26 days, daily, monthly, 26 days, 22 days, 1972, daily, monthly, 26 days, monthly, 26 days, daily, 26 days, monthly, daily, monthly, 22 days, monthly, 26 days, 30th October, 1982, 31st of March, 1982

CARDINAL: 13, 1, 1, 11, 22,600.00, 1, 1, 720.00, 11,90.00, 1, 1, 1, 1981.4, 1, 1, 10,504.00, 3,544.30, 11,960.00, 1981.5, 2, 1, 3,544.30, 1., 13, 3, 2, two, 2, 3, 2(a, more than one, more than one, 1, 6, only one, one, 1, 1982)ILLJ86Mad, more than one, one, 1984)IILLJ464SC, 15, one, 10, 2, 1.11, 2, 3, 1984)IILLJ464SC, two, 18, 2, 3, 2

ORG: Appellate Authority for Maharashtra, Goa, Diu, the Appellate Authority, the Controlling Authority, Shops and Establishment Act, the Bombay Establishment, State Respondent No, the Payment of Gratuity, Form 'N' under Rule 10(1, the Controlling Authority of the State of Maharashtra, the Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Central Government, Controlling Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Payment of Gratuity Act, the State Government, the Central Government, Government, Central, the State Government, Central Government, the Central Government, State, the Central Government, Bombay Shops and Establishment Act, State, Clauses, the Central Government, Clauses, the State Government, Central, the Central Governments, the State Government, the Controlling Authority, The Controlling Authority, Board of Directors, Country, Executives, the Controlling Authority, Central, The Appellate Authority, the Controlling Authority, Limited v. Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority of the State Government, Calcutta, Calcutta, Hyderabad, State, the Central Government, the State Government, the Controlling Authority of the State Government Tamil Nadu, Government, the Government of Tamil Nadu, the Central Government, Madras, the State Government, Madras High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, State, the Controlling Authority, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., the High Court, Court, Legislature, Court, the State Government, the Central Government, The Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority, Shri Digvijiay Woollen Mills Ltd., Shri Mahendra Prataprai Buch, the Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Shri Digvijay Woollen Mills Ltd., Counsel, Counsel, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court

GPE: Application, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Counsel, Bombay, India, India, Jeevanlal, India, Bombay, Delhi, States, Jeevanlal

ORDINAL: 4th, 4th, 24th, Firstly

LOC: Madras, Madras