Kuldipkumar Girdhar Das and Co., a Registered Partnership Firm Through Its Partner Girdhardas L. Ved Vs. Commissioner of State Excise, Government of Maharashtra and the State of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Home Department (Transport and State Excise)

Decided On : Jul-14-2003

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Partnership Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Amendment Act', The Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, Section 2 of the Act, Section 2, the Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, Section 2, the Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, Section 2 of the Act, the Amendment Act, Section 2 of the Act, the Amendment Act

ORG: C.K. Thakker, Special Counsel, Court, the Federation of Associations of Maharashtra (FAM, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, State Excise, Government of Maharashtra, Turbhe, the Bombay Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Court, Court, Court, the State Government, Federation, Court, Court, Petitioners, the Federation in Writ Petition, the Division Bench, Court, Court, Respondents, Court, the Division Bench, the Excise Authorities, the Federation/Association, the State of Maharashtra, the Division Bench, Court, Court, Court, Court, Federation, Contempt Petition, Court, Court, the Division Bench, Federation, Contempt Petition No, Court, the Court observed:'Rule, Court, Court, State, Court, the Federation/Association, Court, the Federation-Association, Association, the Division Bench, Court, the Division Bench, Court, the Federation/Association, the Federation/Association, Special Counsel, the Commissioner of State Excise, Court, Sections, the Commissioner of State Excise, the State Exchequer, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, the Division Bench, Court, the State of Maharashtra, State Excise Department, Hatbhatti, Government, the Laboratory of Mumbai Municipal Corporation, Court, Flying Squad, Metropolitan Magistrate, the State in Criminal Revision Application No., Court, the Division Bench, the Federation/Association, Federation, the Federation/Association, the Office of the Government Pleader, Court, Court, Special Counsel, the Division Bench, Court, the Division Bench, Metropolitan Magistrate, Court, Contempt Petitions, the Division Bench, Court, Special Counsel, Court, Court, Government, Court, Bar, Court

PERSON: S.G. Aney, C.R. Sonawane, P.I. Khemani, XXXV, Sulphur, jaggery.14, Pleader, Rule, S.g, Aney, C.R. Sonawane, P.L. Khemani, Liquor, Licensed Liquor, liquor.33, Ulhasnagar, Ambarnath, Magistrate.34, Nos

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, 24th, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

DATE: 1932, 1993, 1949, 2000, 1949, 2000, 2000, November 16, 2001, 2598, 2002, April 24, 2003, today, '10, ' 11, March 19, 2003, May 19, 2003, May 23, 2003, later than two weeks, today, 2000, 2002, 2002, 2002, April, 2002, April 24, 2002, eight weeks, eight weeks, '20, eight weeks, July 10, 2002, April 24, 2002, eight weeks, eight weeks, October 28, 2002, stated:-'Today, April 2002, '22, 2002, November 1, 2002, April 24, 2002, April 24, 2002, 2003, April 24, 2002, eight weeks, April 24, 2002, April 24, 2002, 24, 2002, May 6, 2003, April 24, 2002, eight weeks, '25, '26, April 24, 2002, May 6, 2002, June 9, 2003, June 17, April 24, 2002, 2000, November 16, 2001, 8, '31, 2002, May 7, 2002, 2002, 129, 2002, 2000, 2000, April 24, 2002, 2000, 2000, May 6, 2003, April 24, 2002

GPE: Navi Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, Clause, jaggery.19, Bombay, A.S., order.27, States, Clause, Mumbai, Thane, C.R., M.S., Mumbai

CARDINAL: 1, 28, 28, 28, less than 90, less than 60, more than 2, more than 6, more than 0.5, more than 10, 70, million, one, 117, 4, 24.4.02, 5, 6, 24.4.2002, 2003.28, only one, 70, 28, 170, 174, 196, five, one, 126, 128, 130, 131, five, 28, 28, 28, 1

PRODUCT: M-21, Act.21, Act.32

EVENT: the Bombay Prohibition Act, Bombay Prohibition Act, Bombay Prohibition Act'

NORP: Hydrochloric

WORK_OF_ART: Bench, Rule in Writ Petition No

LOC: Single, Single, Single