Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Manohar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Decided On : Sep-16-1983

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 73-A of the Act, section 73-A, Constitution, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 73-A, Section 10, Article 14 of theConstitution, section 10, article 14 of the Constitution, Section 73-A, Section 73-A(5, Section 8 of the Act, Section 9, Section 13, Section 14 of the Act, Section 73-A(5, Article 14, Article 19(1)(c, Constitution, Article 19(1)(c, Article 19(1)(c, Constitution, Article 19(1)(c, Constitution, Article 19(1)(c, Article 19, Constitution, Section 4, Section 8 of the Act, Section 9, Section 13, Section 14 of the Act, Section 17, Section 17, Section 78 of the Act, Section 77-A, Section 102, Section 145, Section 4, Section 20, Indian Partnership Act, Section 47, Section 80, Section 164 of the Act, Chapter V of the Act, Section 73-A(5, Article 19(1)(c, Article 19(1)(c, Article 19(1)(c, Article, the Central Act No, the Societies Registration Act, the Central Act, Section 4, the Central Act, Article 19(1)(c, Constitution, Section 73-A of the Act, the Central Act, Article 19(1)(c, S. 73-A, Section 26-B of that Act, Section 73-A, Section 73-A, Maharashtra Amendment Act No, Article 19(1)(c, Article 19 of the Constitution.22, Article 19, Article 19, section 23, Section 23, Article 19, the Bombay Act, Maharashtra Act No, Section 73, the Full Bench, Article 19(4, Article 19(1)(c

NORP: J.1, Joint, Punjab, Indian

CARDINAL: 5, 5, 2, 34, 34, 5, 1983.4, 5, 1, 5, 5, 1, 5, 73, 5, 1978)ILLJ1SC, 5, 1, 1, 1, 1, 19(1)(c, 4, 8, 18, 79, two, 41, 42, 60 and 61, 1978]2SCR621, 13, 5, 5, 73, one, two, three, more than two, more than one, one, 1, 2, 3, 27, 1969.20, 1962]3SCR547, 5, 4, 19(1)(c, 19, 8)'The, 45, 5 and 6, 1, 2, 4, 19, 4, 4, 19, 4, 2, 4, two, 19, 2, 19, 221):', 2, 4, 19, 10, 27, 103, 12, more than one, three, more than two, 5, 19(1)(c, 28

DATE: 1960, 1969, 1969, July 1, 1971, more than six years, three years, six years, the consecutive period of, six years, 1969, twelve months of the date, six years, the period of, six years, 1977, Nov 8, 1970, December 30, 1973, 1977, five years, November 28, 1982, five years, six years, July 1, S. 2(2, July 29, 1971, July 29, 1971, six years, July 1, 1977, Nov. 28, 1982, November 28, 1987, April 15, 1983 :, 1983, 14, six year, July 29, 1971, 14, 1981, 1983, 40, five years, five years, five years, 1932, six years, three years, the period of, six years, 1860, '17, a period of, six years, three years, 1970, S. 31(5, '19, 1969, less than six years, three years, 1981, 1983, June 18, 1968, 1952, 19(1, 18, 19,, 22, '23, 1949, 1969, March 27, 1969, more than six consecutive years, 1983, six years, the consecutive period of, six years, six years, '26

ORG: Housing Society Limite, the Managing Committee, Society, the State Government, Gazettee, the state Government, Registrar, Committee, the Government Gazette, Joint, Society, Petn, No 1418 of 1981, Sec, Joint, the Supreme Court, General Mills Co. Ltd., Shambhu Nath, Court, the Supremen Court, the Supremen Court, Act, Registrar, Society, Acc, Registrar, Registrar, the Supreme Court, Preamble, State, State, Registrar, Register, Registrar, Registrar, Sec, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, the State Government's, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, the supreme court, State, State, State, Court, State, the State of its, Damayanti v. Union of India, Sammelan, Supreme, The Supreme Court, Association, Association, Association, Association, Association, Association, Association, Damayanti, Sammelan, Corporation, Corporation, Act, Registrar, Registrar, Sec, Joint, Committee, the Bombay Enactment, Court, all India Conference, the National Policy, State, the Supreme Court, Raghubar Dayal v. Union of India, the Forward Contracts (Regulation ) Act, the Central Government and Section 10, the Central Government, the Madhya Pradesh Co-operative, Registrar, Court, Theroy, Cooperation, Practice of Cooperation, P.2, Kamta Prasad, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Sec, Court, the State Legislature, The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Court, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Statement of Objects, Maharashtra Government Gazette, State, the Division Bench, Legislature, Sun-sec(5, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Court, Constitution of India, Court

PERSON: Honorary, Honorary, Honorary, Honorary, wherein, Honorary, Gazette, Honorary, Deshpande, Art, Siddheshwar Sahakari, Mah Lj 719, Bench, Bench, Additional, Art, Desai, t. Damayanti Naranga v. Union of India, Act.14, Maneka Gandhi, Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Art, Brinjgoapal Denga v. State of M. P. :, Art, Art, H. Calvart, Registrar, Deshpande, Gherulal Parakh, Mahadeodas, Fram Nusserwanji v. State, Brij Gopal's, Reasons, Bill NO, Bill, Taluka, Karkhana, Deshpande, Fram Nusserwanji v. state, Deshpande, Art, Deshpande

GPE: Art, Delhi, Art, India, S, Smt, Delhi, Art, Art, pp, India, India, Abroad, Kulkarni, India, Abroad, Kulkarni, Societies, cls./, Art, India, Art, Art, Bombay, Art, Chagla, Art, india, States, India, Art, Apex, Sidheswar, Brij, Bombay, Madha, Highcourt, India, India

PRODUCT: Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench

LOC: Act.12, Madras

WORK_OF_ART: Ministers for Cooperation

EVENT: the Constitution of India, the Bombay Prohibition Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //