Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Ramakrishna Bajaj (Huf)

Decided On : Nov-18-1991

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 27(3, section 46, the Explanation II, the Explanation II

PERSON: V.A. Mohta, J.1, Nagpur, Nagpur, Shri Chandurkar, Ashok K. Parikh, N. Krishnan, L. G. Balakrishna, CWT, Haryana, M. Lakshmaiah, Haryana

DATE: 1957, 1957, 1957, 1922, 11 of 1922, 1961, 43 of 1961, 1987, a few days, year

GPE: Vidarbha, Gujarat, Gujarat

ORG: Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, High Courts, Department, ii)(e, Department, The Gujarat High Court, CWT, Appellate, CWT v. Pratap Bhogilal, Department, Haryana High Court, Ashok Kumar Oswal, CWT, CWT, The Bombay High Court, the Tribunal The Tribunal, the Bombay High Court, Tribunal, High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Bombay High Court, Bombay High Court, Karnataka High Courts, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, CIT, Bombay High Court, Karnataka High Courts, Madras High Court, Department, the Supreme Court, The Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 1D, 2, 1D, 3, 4., 5, 6., 1D, two, thirds, two, 8, 1981]129ITR46(Guj, 52, 1D, two, 9, 167, 501, 504, two, 10, 11, 1986]162ITR309(KAR, 12, 13, 1988]173ITR266(Mad, 1988]174ITR4(AP, 8), 14, 15

MONEY: 85 per cent

NORP: Indian, Punjab, Gujarat, Punjab, Punjab, Gujarat

ORDINAL: firstly, secondly, first, fourth, first, second, second, first