i.C.i.C.i. Limited Vs. Patheja Brothers Forgings and Stampings Limited and Others

Decided On : Mar-03-2000

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 7(1, section 19(7, Section 17, Section 19, section 19(7, section 22, section 22, section 22, section 19, section 19, section 26, Section 31(1, section 19, section 31, Section 31(1, Section 31(1, the D.R.T. Act, the D.R.T. Act, the D.R.T. Act, section 31, the D.R.T. Act, Rule 1, the D.R.T. Act, section 51, section 2(g, section 2(g, the D.R.T. Act, section 31, the D.R.T. Act, section 19, section 31, section 31, section 31, section 2(g, section 31, the D.R.T. Act, the D.R.T. Act, the D.R.T. Act

ORG: Kapadia, the Central Government, Court, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Court, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, Court, the Court Receiver, Court, Court, Court Receiver, Court, Court, the High Court, Government, Government, the High Court, the Original Side Rules, Court, the Court Receiver, Court, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, Accountant General, Court, the Court Receiver, High Court, jewellery, the Court Receiver, R.B.I., the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, general administration department, The Court Receiver, the High Court, The Court Receiver, Court, Additional Prothonotary & Senior, The Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, Banks and Financial Institutions, Court, Court, the Court Receiver, The Court Receiver, The Court Receiver, The Court Receiver, The Court Receiver, The Court Receiver, the State Government, the High Court, the Court Receiver, Court, the State Government, the Court Receiver, the State Government, D.R.T., Court, Bank, Court Receiver's, the Court Receiver, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Small Causes Court, the Court Receiver, Small Causes Court, the Central Government, D.R.T., Court, the Central Government, The Court Receiver, Court, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, the Central Government, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, the High Court, the High Court, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, Court, the Court Receiver, Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court, Court Receiver, The Recovery of Debts Due to, Banks and Financial Institutions, Bank, Financial Institution, Civil Court, D.R.T., Bank, the Central Government, inter alia, D.R.T., Banks and Financial Institutions, Tribunal, D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, D.R.T. However, Court, Tribunal, D.R.T., Tribunal, D.R.T., Tribunal, Court, D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., Tribunal, the Civil Court, D.R.T., D.R.T., Court, D.R.T., the Court Receiver, D.R.T., Receivers, Receivers, Court, the Court Receiver, High Court, Court, Court, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, High Court, D.R.T., Court Receiver, D.R.T., the Court Receiver, High Court, D.R.T., D.R.T., the Court Receiver, Court, the Court Receiver, D.R.T., Civil Court, Court, Court, D.R.T., the Apex Court, State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, Ballabh Das & Co., Court, Bank of India v. Tin Pack Corporation &, Chamber Summons 963, Court, Chandra Shekhara Das, Bank of Maharashtra v. Konkan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Suit No, Court, Tribunal, Banks and Financial Institutions, Court, D.R.T., the Court Receiver, Court, Court, The Court Receiver, Court, the Court Receiver, Court, the Court Receiver, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, Court, Court, D.R.T., the Court Receiver, Court Receiver, D.R.T., Court Receiver, Court, Court, The Court Receiver, Court, Court, D.R.T., the High Court, the Court Receiver, D.R.T., the Receiver of D.R.T., the Court Receiver, the Receiver of D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., Court, D.R.T., D.R.T., the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, de novo, Court, United Bank of India v. D.R.T., the Supreme Court, D.R.T., the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Banks and Financial Institutions, the Supreme Court, State Bank of Bikaner, Ballabh Das & Co., the Supreme Court, D.R.T., Tribunal, Court, D.R.T., D.R.T., the Civil Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, Civil Court, the Civil Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, D.R.T., the High Court, D.R.T., the Apex Court, Court, Court, the D.R.T./Central Government, D.R.T., D.R.T., Receivers, D.R.T., the Court Receiver, High Court, Court, Court, D.R.T., D.R.T., the Banks and Financial Institutions, the Banks and Financial Institutions, the Central Government, Court, D.R.T. this Court, D.R.T., D.R.T., the Court Receiver, the Central Government, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, the High Court, the State Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the Court Receiver, Court, the Court Receiver, High Court, the Central Government, Court, D.R.T. this Court, the Court Receiver, High Court, the Court Receiver, D.R.T., Court, theCourt, the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, Court, the Civil Courts, the Court Receiver, State, Court, Court, Court, the Banks or Financial Institutions, Court, the Court Receiver, Court, Court, Court, the Court Receiver, Court, D.R.T., D.R.T., Court, Court, The Court Receiver, the Court Receiver, High Court, the High Court, the Court Receiver to D.R.T., High Court, the Prothonotary & Senior, the Court Receiver to, D.R.T., Court Receiver's, the Small Causes Court, the Court Receiver to D.R.T., The Court Receiver, Court

NORP: J.1, Hiralal

DATE: 16th July, 1999, 1993, 16th July, 1999, 1993, 16th July 1999, 1929, 1929, 1932, 4th February 2000, 2000, daily, daily, annual, the last Financial Year ending on 31st March 1999, last 60 years, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, 1993, the day, 16th July 1999, 17th January 2000, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, the day, September 1999, 1998, 1992, 2000, 16th July 1999, 16th July, 1999, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, 1999, 2000, 16th July 1999, 16th July 1999, the years, the years, 16th July 1999, 1993, 16th July 1999, 10th March 2000.11

PRODUCT: Debt, Valuers, Valuers, D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T. under section 22of, D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T.

CARDINAL: 10, 5, two, 592, approximately 100, One, 2, 10, thousands, 1, 3, 782, 2000(1, 72, 292, 1, One, 104, 102, one, one, 2000, one, 1962]1SCR868, one

GPE: determination:(i, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, India, Bombay, Bombay, India, Assam, Kanyakumari, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, India, Bombay, Bombay, Receiver, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, B.C.R., D.R.T, Receiver, S.C., S.C., Bombay, Receiver, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, C.P.C., Bombay, Mumbai, India, Bombay, Bombay, India, Bombay, Bombay

ORDINAL: first, third, 3rd, first, first

PERSON: Court Receiver, Court Receiver, Order XL, Order XL, Order XL, Rebello, J., J., B.J., de novo, the D.R.T. Hence, Jaipur, Ordinance, Loonkaran Sethiya, Holmes

FAC: D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T.

WORK_OF_ART: Ordinance