Sayed Kassam Ibrahim Vs. M.M. Chudasama - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-17-1956

Court: Mumbai

LAW: the Police Act, Jamadars, Rule 3(c, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article, Article 311 of the Constitution, Constitution

GPE: Chagla

PERSON: C. J. 1, Khanse, Raje, Superintendent Subhan, Superintendent Paranjpe, Pednekar, Pandya, Samant, Mistree, Item, Khan-se, Rule 3(c).If, M.K. Rane v. M.M. Chudasama', Bashiruddin, Superintendent, Justice Desal, Shantaram, Chudasama, Desai J., Desai J. of Rule 3(b

ORG: the Bombay City Police Force, the Commissioner of Police, Magistrate, Sub-Inspector Khanse, the State of Bombay, State, Inquiries, Division, provides:'In, Court, Inquiry, Tribunal, Justice, the State Government

CARDINAL: 23-6-1955.2, one, 12, 15-11-1950, 14, 23, 31-3-1953, 17-6-1954, 16-10-1954.On, 23-6-1955.3, three, 3(d, 16, two, 3(c).The two, 39, 19-8-1955, 23-6-1955, 226

DATE: 27-10-1950, 31-10-1950, 16-11-1950, 17-11-1950, 14-5-1953, 14-5-1955, 1949

NORP: Rules

LOC: Superintendent, Departmental

ORDINAL: second, first

EVENT: Inspector