Aminchand Pyarelal Vs. Union of India

Decided On : Apr-02-1976

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10, Rule 6, the Code of Civil Procedure, Rule 137, Rule 143, the Indian Succession Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 295 nor Rule 710, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10, the Civil Procedure Code, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 151, Section 151, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 Order of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10 of the Code of Civil, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 151, the Notice of Motion, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10, Section 151, Section 10 of the Code, Section 10 of the Code, Section 151

ORG: Vimadalal, the applicability of Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Iron and Steel Controller, the Iron and Steel Order, the Koyna Project, the State of Maharashtra, the Iron and Steel Equalisation Fund, the Koyna Project, the Iron and Steel Control Order, the Price & Accounts Officer, the High Court, the Iron & Steel Controller, Suit, Calcutta, the Koyna Project, the Iron and Steel Equalization Fund, Mild Steel Plates, the High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Reliance, Court, Court, Court, Court, Rule 137, Court, Original Side, Manekji, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Lassoo & Sons, Court, Reliance, Court, the High Court Rules, the High Court Rules, Court, Hirji Ramji v. Daulatram Ratanji & Co., Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta Suit, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Mild Steel Plates, the Calcutta Suit, Jai Hind Iron Mart, the Calcutta High Court, J.T. Republike, Bijayesh Mukharji J., the Calcutta High Court, S.K. Rungta & Co., Nawal Kishore, AIR1964Cal373, Calcutta, Calcutta, the Calcutta High Court, J.T. Republike, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, J.T. Republike's, the Supreme Court

NORP: J.1, Rules

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, second, first, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, second, First, Secondly

GPE: M.S., India, Japan, Order VIII, pp, Najan, India

DATE: June 17/23, 1958, April 22, 1952, January 31, 1968, April 30, 1969, 1969, June 17/23, 1958, September 13, 1971, 8,40,292.63, 4046, 1969, 1925, 1969, 1007-1008, 1289, 4046, 1969

CARDINAL: One, 1, 2,45,862.51, 24, two, 11, 5,61,063.10, 1, two, 13, 39.231, 6, 2, 1964]2SCR567, 6, 6, 11, 6, 144, 710, 72, 24-25, 137, 143, 137, 6, 1403):.In, one, 6, 2, 6, 2, 24, 5,61,063.10, 11, 13, 39.231, two, two, two, one, 4,50,880, two, 26,056, two, 15, 387):.True, two, one, one, two, 11, 13, 1, 11, 2, two, 3, two, 39, two

PERSON: Motion, Laxmidas, Nanabhai, Order VIII, Laxmidas, L.R., Order XXI, Thakkar, Wadia J., Order VIII, Wadia J., Thakkar, Schedule, Thakkar, Edison Mariner, S.S. Alriadah, Mitter J., S.S. Alriadah, Thakkar, Thakkar, Thakkar, Thakkar, Thakkar, Manohar Lal v. Seth Hiralal, Thakkar

EVENT: the Civil Procedure Code

PRODUCT: Rule 144, Rule 146, Rungta

MONEY: 95 per cent, 5 per cent

QUANTITY: 7037 long tons, 3510 tons