Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mahavir Jain Vs. State (Local Bodies)

Decided On : Jan-20-2015

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

LAW: Constitution, Constitution, Section 2(b

CARDINAL: 1, 4, 5, 20, 1, 2, 3., 3(i, 3(2, 6, 2, 3, one, 3, 5, 6, 4., 4, 1, 2, 5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8), 5, 385, 385, 385, more than one, 1, 2, 6, 7, 1 211, 420, 420, 120B, 17, 451, 323, 341, 147, 452, 323, 420, 384, 30.08.1996, 420, 284, 07.05.2011, 29.11.2011 5, 6 182, 384, 385/34, 7 183, 8 255, 385, 500, 27.03.1996, 8, 15.06.1994, 8, 4, 8, 4, Member 9, six, four, 8, four, fifty thousand, five, one, 10

PERSON: JUDICATURE, RAJASTHAN, JAISHREE THAKUR, S.P.Sharma, Sandeep Shah, S.S.Ladrecha, Ravindra Singh, Kuldeep Mathur, Kausar Parveen, Sunil Ambwani, Actg, Barmer, Barmer, Municipality Barmer, Municipality Barmer, Municipality Barmer, MLA, Barmer, Barmer, Municipality Barmer, District Barmer, Municipality Barmer, Municipality Barmer, MLA, P.I.L.196, Singh Chaufal, Rules 385-E, Format, 385-G. Prima, Challan No.71 / Sections, Kotwali Barmer, Kotwali Barmer, Challan, Kotwali Barmer, Kotwali Barmer, Kotwali, Kotwali Barmer, Kotwali Barmer, Kotwali Barmer, Addl, Barmer, Mewa Ram Jain, Barmer, Barmer, Barmer, Mewa Ram Jain, Barmer, Barmer, Barmer, Barmer, Jodhpur.13, Mewa Ram Jain.14, Barmer, Barmer, discharged.16, JAISHREE THAKUR, Actg

ORG: PIL, Rajasthan & Ors, PIL, Rajasthan & Ors, PIL, Rajasthan & Ors, G.S.SANDHU & ORS, AAG, Department of Local Bodies, Municipal Council, Municipal Funds, Local Fund Audit, Kacchi Basti, Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Bureau, no.9, Municipal Land, Court, PAN Card, Government, FIR, Permanent Account, Court, Hon’ble Supreme Court, Public Interest Litigation, State of Uttaranchal Vs, High Courts, The Supreme Court, the High Courts, Court, PIL, PIL, Supreme Court, PIL, PIL, Laws.195, The Public Interest Litigation, Court, the High Courts, PIL, PIL, PIL, each High Court, PIL, PIL, the High Courts, The Registrar General, each High Court, the High Court, P.I.L., PIL, PIL, PIL, Hon’ble Supreme Court, the High Court, the Rajasthan High Court Rules, PIL, Shri Mahavir Jain, IPC & 17, Sections 388, IPC, Challan No.208/ Sections, IPC Police, FR AV, Section 384/34 IPC Police, FR AV, Section 384/34 IPC Police, Investigation under Sections 327, Police Station, FR AV, Section 384/34 IPC Police, Investigation under Sections 384, IPC, Police Station, the Rajasthan Control of Goondas Act, District Magistrate, Member of Legislative Assembly, Municipal Council, the Rajasthan Control of Goondas Act, Municipal Board, Legislative Assembly, the High Court, Member of Legislative Assembly, the High Court, the State Government, Court, the District Magistrate, Rajasthan High Court, Society, Court, Court, AMBWANI

PERCENT: 3 D.B.CIVIL

DATE: January 2015, 8, 8, year 2000, 8, year 2000, 8, last more then 15 years, 8, more than four decades, three months, 10.10.1990, 18, 15.07.1996, 08.09.2011, 1975, 30.12.1997, the year 2009.9, 1975, Today, today

GPE: Jaipur, no.7, Municipality, no.7, the State of Rajasthan, C.B.I., no.7, India, no.7, no.7, Rajasthan, Municipality, the State of Rajasthan, submitted.10, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Rs.50,000/-, Municipality, Municipality

NORP: Rules, Bastis

QUANTITY: 385-H. Declaration necessary.-

PRODUCT: no.9

EVENT: Police 29.12.1994

LOC: Municiaplity

WORK_OF_ART: The Writ Petition No.9730/2011, D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //