Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Acrow India Limited

Decided On : Feb-20-1991

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Finance Act, section 2(6, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, the Finance Act

PERSON: D.R. Dhanuka, J.1, Vikhroli, Vikhroli Metal, Jetley, Neo Pharma Pvt, Pharma, Pharma, A.M. Mukherjee, Jetley, Jetley, Jetley, Rajmohan Cashews, Kerala, Neo Pharma Pvt

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench ', Tribunal, Paragraph, Hindustan Construction Company Limited, Acrow Engineering Limited, Vikhroli Metal Fabricators Limited, Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., Vikhroli Metal Fabricators, Vikhroli Metal Fabricators Limited, Vikhroli Metal Fabricators, Vikhroli Metal Fabricators Limited, Vikhroli Metal Fabricators, Fabricators, Appellate, Appellate Tribunal, Acrow Engineering Limited, Vikhroli Metal Fabricators Limited, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, High Court, the High Court of Calcutta, CIT, Calcutta, the High Court of Calcutta, ITR, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the High Court, CIT, Minocha Brothers P. Ltd., the High Court, CIT, Oricon Pvt, CIT, Shah Construction Co. Ltd., the High Court, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Vikhroli Metal Fabricators Limited, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal

MONEY: 256(1

DATE: 1961, 1969, 1969, 1969, previous year ended on June 30, 1968, December 18, 1962, December 18, 1962, 1965-66, 1965, July 7, 1982, 1982, 1983, year 1965-66, this year

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2, 72, 22, 3., only two, 1, 3,25,000, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 1982]137ITR879(Bom, 1978]113ITR718(Cal, 347, 137, 14, one, 1986]160ITR134(Delhi, 1989]176ITR407(Bom, 142, 696, 1990]185ITR472(Ker, 273, 10, 1982]137ITR879(Bom, 1

GPE: London, London, Addl, Delhi, Kerala, Kerala

PRODUCT: Circular

ORDINAL: second