Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Pacific Refractories Ltd. Vs. SteIn Heurtey India Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : Feb-10-2006

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 39, Article 39, the Indian Contract Act, Article 5 of the, ARTICLE 5 - CORRESPONDENCE :, supplied)Article 5, Article 43, Article 39, Article 39, ARTICLE 39 - GOVERNING LA WAND JURISDICTION, Section 28, the Contract Act, Section 23, the Contract Act, the Contract Act, Section 23, the Contract Act, Article 39, Article 39, Article 39, Article 39, Section 20(c, the Contract Act, Article 39, Article 39, Article 43 of the Contract, Article 12 of the Contract, Article 12, ARTICLE 40, Article 39, Article 39, Article 39, Article 39 otiose.40, Article 39

PERSON: S.J. Vazifdar, J.1, Kutty, Tulzapurkar, Mica Bricks, Mica Bricks, Exhibit, Purchase Order, Exhibit-'B, Girdharlal Purshottamdas, Bench, Anr, A. P. Agencies, Bench, Bench, Girdharlal Purshottamdas, Anr, A. P. Agencies, Girdharlal Purshottamdas, Exhibit, Girdharlal Purshottamdas, Girdharlal Purshottamdas, Tulzapurkar, Anson, Kutty, Supplier, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Contract, Bangalore, Bangalore, Bangalore, A. P. Agencies, Tulzapurkar, Kutty, Kutty, Kutty, Anr, A. P. Agencies, Mohmadabad, Tamil Nadu, Mohmadabad, Tulzapurkar, Anr, A. P. Agencies, Kutty, Kutty, Kutty, Poona, Poona, Kutty, Rajasthan, Kutty, Tulzapurkar, albeit mistaken

CARDINAL: 26, 3, 4, Two, 3, 4, 3, 30-4-2003, 11, 116/209.0, 116/209.0, 116/209.0, 116/209.0, 22-10-2003, 3, 4, 3, 1966]1SCR656, three, 7, 8, 8), 1989]2SCR1a, two, 15, three, 3, 22-10-2003, 22-10-2003, 11, 3, 8-8-2003.14, 22-10-2003, 22-10-2003, 3, 8, 8), 1All, 161, 4, 4, 1995]3SCR443, 5, 21, 1989]2SCR1a, 21, two, one, 23, 28, 21, 20, 22, 20, one, one, 2, 12, two, 23, 28, 9, 6, 5, one, 652, three

PERCENT: 18%

GPE: Bombay, L.O.I., Kolkata, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bombay, Bombay, Salem, Salem, Bombay, Bhagwandas Goverdhandas, Calcutta.16, Bombay, Bombay, England, Farwell, Mumbai, Calcutta.23, Mumbai, Mumbai, the State of Karnataka, the State of Karnataka, Karnataka, Bihar State, supplied)27, Salem, Salem, Udyognagar, Gujarat, Udyognagar, Gujarat, Kaira, Salem, Salem, Salem, Kaira, Kaira, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Delhi, India, Trivandrum, KLT, Bombay, Bombay

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Mortars, Mortars, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Contract Number, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Bellary

ORG: the Calcutta High Court, PRL/AC/, PRL/DSV/723/03, Insulating Bricks, Insulating Bricks, Ref, Original, Contract, Calcutta, Exhibit 'C', the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Calcutta, the Supreme Court, Bhagwandas, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, Holwell Securities Ltd., Hughes, the Court of Appeal, Court, Bruner v. Moore, Contract, the Letters Patent, Indian Laws, the Supreme Court, Angile Insulations v. Davy Ashmore India Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, High Court, Court, A.B.C. Laminart, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Court, High Court, the Court of Subordinate, Dhanbad, the High Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court', the Supreme Court, M/s Angile Insulations, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., Court, the Courts of, Salem Chemical Industries, Bird and Co. 8, Calcutta, the Court at Calcutta, Court, Confirmation No, the Civil Court, Kaira Court, Court, Court, Kaira, Salem, Court, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., Hanil Era Textiles Ltd., Puromatic Filters, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Courts except Courts, The Court of Additional District Judge, the Calcutta High Court, the Supreme Court, Courts, Court, The Supreme Court, the Kerala High Court, The National Starch and Chemicals, Weikfield Products Co., AIR1990Ker291, Poona, Poona, Poona, Poona, Poona, Poona, Court, Court, Court, Court, Vikalanga Sevaka Co-op, Society Ltd., Sheth Brothers, Court, Court, Court, Trivandrum Sub Court, Court, Calcutta, Arbitration Clause, the Calcutta High Court, Calcutta High Court, Calcutta High Court, Indian Laws, Arbitration, The Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, The Calcutta High Court, The Calcutta High Court, Courts, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court

DATE: 2003, 7-8-2003, 8-8-2003, 8-8-2003, 2240-2003, 25-10-2003, 8-8-2003, 8-8-2003, 2003, 7-8-2003, 8-8-2003, 7-8-2003, 8-8-2003, 8-8-2003, 7-8-2003, 1974, seven days, 21, 21, 1983, monthly, 12 weeks, today

ORDINAL: first, first, Firstly, second, first, Thirdly

FAC: Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia, Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia, Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia, Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia, Suramangalam Road Salem

WORK_OF_ART: Ordinarily', the Chamber Summons, the Chamber Summons

NORP: Henthorn v. Fraser, Henthorn v. Fraser, Purchaser

LOC: Purchaser, construed.22

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //