Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Virendra Kumar Khairulal Jaiswal Vs. K.L. Aney

Decided On : Dec-11-1974

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Bombay Prohibition Act.2, Section 80, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibitions Act, Notice under Section 80, Section 80, Section 146A, Section 146-A, Section 80, Section 15(2, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 15(2, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 146-A, the General Act, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 80, Section 80, Section 15(2, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 3, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 15(2, Section 15(2, Section 15(2, the Limitation Act, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 15(2, Section 146-A, the Limitation Act, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 4 to 24, Section 15(2, the Limitation Act, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 146-A, Section 4 to 24, Section 167 of the Act, Section 167, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bengal Municipal Act, Section 29, Section 15(2, Section 532(2, the Bengal Municipal Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, The Assam Municipal Act, the Limitation Act, Section 110, Section 110, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 15, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 110, Section 29(2, Section 110, Section 15(2, the Limitation Act, the Indian Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 15(2, the Indian Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, Section 15(2, the Limitation Act, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 80, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 146-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 15(2

PERSON: J.1, Civil J., Sr. Division, Government, Ben, Schedule, Schedule, Nirode Sundari Dasya Basak, Maulvi Emdadal Hoque, AIR1940Cal305, Bankim chandra Ghose, Thana Municipality AIR, Municipality, Nirode Sundari

CARDINAL: 1500/-, 2, 28, one, one, 2, 9, 22, 101, 2, 109, 110, 259, 4 to 24

ORG: P.D. Apshankar, Yeotmal, the Hyderabad Firm, Court, Civil Procedure, to.5, Court, Government, Government, Court, Sections 4 to 24, Sections 4 to, Sections 4 to, Legislature, Legislature, High Courts, Court, Thana, AIR 1932 Bom 259, the Bombay District Municipal Act, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Commrs, AIR1942Cal544, the Calcutta High Court, defendant:'It, Legislature, Legislature, District Board, the Assam High Court, Tinsukia Municipal Board, Legislature, a Municipal Board, Legislature, Schedule I, Limitation Act, Court, Madras High Court, M. C. Industries, the applicability of Section 15(2, the applicability of Section 15(2, Court, Chhaganlal, AIR1942Cal544, Court, Court, Court

DATE: 1972, 24-7-1971, the period of, four months, the period of six months, a period of, four months, four months, four months, a two months', the two months' period, four months, 1963, four months, four months, four months, the two months, four months, the period of, four months, four months, four months, four months, only four months, four months, one month's, six months, a period of, six month, 1908, six months, 1950, three months, only three months, one month, one month's, six months, six months, six months, six months, six months, four months

EVENT: the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act

ORDINAL: First

GPE: Pabna Municipality, Sections 4, Chittagong, Trustees, Madras Port v., Limitation

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //