The Indian Radio and Cable Communications Company, Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Presidency and Aden.

Decided On : Apr-08-1937

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Companies Act, Pound 90,000, Pound 10,000, Pound 1,000, Pound 9,000

ORG: the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, S. 66(2, the Indian Income Tax Act, the High Court, the Assessee company', the Indian Income Tax Act, the Imperial and International Communications Ltd., the Communications Company, the Eastern Telegraph company Ltd., China Telegraph Company Ltd., the Communications Company, The Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, Madras, the Communications Company, Karachi, Radio Company, the Communications Company :-(a, Karachi, the Communications Company, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, the Communication Company, Rupees, the Board of Directors, Radio Company, the Radio Company justify.(2, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, the Communications Company, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, Telegraph Companies, the Government of India, the Radio Company, Reserve, Radio Company, the Communications Company, Radio Company, the Communications Company, Radio, the Communications Company.(3, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, Reserve Fund, Rupees, Communications Company, the Communications Company, Communications, The Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Indian Government Telegraph Department, Karachi, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Indian Government Telegraph Department, Karachi, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, Court, Lordships, RANGNEKAR, J., Lordships, the High Court, the Communication Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, Pondicherry Railway Co., Ltd., Income Tax, Lors MACMILLAN, W.H.E., Adamson v. Union Cold Storage Company, Lordships

GPE: Bombay, Bombay, India, India, India, India, Bombay, India, India, India, India, London, Bombay, India, Bombay, India, Iraq, India, India, India, India, India, Iraq, Bombay, India, India

DATE: March 28, 1935, 1922, 1922, the year, March 31, 1934, the day of February 19, 1932, 1922, 1913, 1932, February 19, 1932, December 31, 1944, quarterly, the thirty-first March, the thirtieth June, the thirtieth September, each year, six weeks, its financial years, fourteen days, year, Annual, such financial year, each year, December 31, 1934, December 31, 1944, the year 1933-34 ended March 31, 1934, the financial year, February 22, 1934, the year, the year, years

CARDINAL: half, 5, two, two, less than half, 3, 5, ninety thousand, four, One-half, half, ninety thousand, half, ninety thousand, 6, 3, one half, one-half, more than one, half

PERSON: S., Latter, Madras, Majesty

MONEY: eighty per cent, 10 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: Revenue.(2

LOC: Madras, the Persian Gulf, the Persian Gulf, Madras