Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Mahomed Haji Hamed Vs. Pirojshaw R. Vakharia and Co.
Decided On : Jul-20-1931
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 3, Section 3(1, Section 5, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 4(b, Section 4, the Indian Arbitration Act, the English Arbitration Act, Section 27, Section 4, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Act
ORG: Wadia, the Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, Association, Association, the Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, Court, Bombay Cotton Company, Association, Court, Court, Madhavji Govindji & Co.
NORP: J.1, of700
CARDINAL: 82, 82, 800, 100, 66, one, 68, 82, 100, 82, 82, 82, 82, three, 700, two, two, 700, two, 100, 82, 1, 881, two, 33, 759, 81, 82, 82, 700
DATE: July 21, 1930, 65, 66, 67, 68, 1899, 1889, 49, 1899, 1930
QUANTITY: 800 bales, 800 bales, 100 bales, 800 bales, 800 bales
PERSON: Broach, Blackwell, J. inRambaksh v., J., Hickman, Kent, Homey Marsh Sheepbreeders', L.R.
GPE: Bombay, Astbury, Babubhai
TIME: the English Act
LANGUAGE: English