Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mahomed Haji Hamed Vs. Pirojshaw R. Vakharia and Co.

Decided On : Jul-20-1931

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 3, Section 3(1, Section 5, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 4(b, Section 4, the Indian Arbitration Act, the English Arbitration Act, Section 27, Section 4, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Act

ORG: Wadia, the Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, Association, Association, the Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, Court, Bombay Cotton Company, Association, Court, Court, Madhavji Govindji & Co.

NORP: J.1, of700

CARDINAL: 82, 82, 800, 100, 66, one, 68, 82, 100, 82, 82, 82, 82, three, 700, two, two, 700, two, 100, 82, 1, 881, two, 33, 759, 81, 82, 82, 700

DATE: July 21, 1930, 65, 66, 67, 68, 1899, 1889, 49, 1899, 1930

QUANTITY: 800 bales, 800 bales, 100 bales, 800 bales, 800 bales

PERSON: Broach, Blackwell, J. inRambaksh v., J., Hickman, Kent, Homey Marsh Sheepbreeders', L.R.

GPE: Bombay, Astbury, Babubhai

TIME: the English Act

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //