Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tulsidas Jesingbhai Parikh and ors. Vs. Raisingji Fulabhai Vaghela and anr.

Decided On : Apr-21-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 51, a Pull Bench, a Full Bench, Section 29, the Full Bench, Section 1, Section 38

PERSON: Baker, J.1, Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Hal Ranchhod v. Gordhan Keshav, Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Hunooman Persaud, Mohanund Mondul v. Nafur Mondul, Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Hindu Law, Seetharamanna, Appiah A.I.R., Gordhan A.I.R., Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Manu, Divatia, Manu, Lordships, Ranee, Nafur Mondul, Seetharamanna, AppiaJi A.I.R., Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Madras, Robson, Ahmad Ali, Robson, Mahomedan, Mutsaddi A.I.R., Mahomedan, Patkar, Kumaraswami Sastri, J., Kasinatha A.I.R., Robson, Robson, Sundara Nadan v., Khan, Ma Chit, Divatia, Wards Act.14, Patkar, Divatia, Nafur Mondul, Nanabhai Haridas, J., Robson, Ahmad Ali, Mutsaddi A.I.R., Mahomedan, Mahomedan, Mahomedan, Ranee, Sahu Bam Chandra v. Bhup, Golab Ghand Baboo, Bam Ghunder Sen, Vidya Varutl-II Thirtha, Balusami Ayyar, Nafur Mondul, Krishna Das v., Nathu Bam A.I.R., Seetharamanna, Appiah A.I.R., Shoma Chhagan, Divatia, Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Limbaji Ravji's, Kasinatha, Kumaraswami Sastri, J., Robson, ho, Mayne, Dinslaah Mulla, Mayne, Dinshah Mulla, Lalla Bunseedhur, Koonwur Bindeseree Dutt Singh, Limbaji-Ravji v. Rahi, Barlee, Patkar, Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Hunoomanpersaud, Nafur Mondul, Appiah A.I.R., Shoma Chhagan, Limbaji Mavji, Rahi A.I.R., Hunoomanpersaud, Limbaji Ravji v. Rahi, Hunoomanpersaud, Patkar

NORP: Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Mt. Babooee, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Mt. Babooee, Mt. Babooee, Hindu, Hindu, Imambandi, Hindu, Hindu, Hindus, Hindu, Indian Christians, Ranja, Burmese, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Harilal, Hindu, Hindu, Imambandi, Hindu, Mt. Babooee, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindus, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

ORDINAL: third, first, third, third, first, first, third, third, first

ORG: High Courts, T.P. Act 1882, Mulla, the High Courts, Mulla, the High Courts, Hunooman Persaud, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Hunooman Persaud, Court, Court, Court, the High Courts of Calcutta, Court, Harilal Ranchhod, Court, the Privy Council, The High Courts of Calcutta, the Privy Council, This High Court, High Courts, Court, the Privy Council, Lordships, Ramaswamy, the Madras High Court, Annammal A.I.R., Rang, Court, Court, Court, Guardians, Colebrooke, Digest of Hindu Law, Banerjee, Colebrooke, Bai Amrit, Lordships of the Privy Council, Privy Council, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, T.P. Act, Hunooman, the Privy Council, Baboo Kameswar Pershad, Prosunno Kumari, Debya, P.C. 123, High Courts, Privy Council, P.C. 87, this-Court, Nathuram, Bai Amrit, Bai Amrit, Colebrooke, Honapa v. Mhalpai, Harilal Ranchhod, Guardians, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, Hunoomanpersaud, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Ramaswamy, the Privy Council, Hunoomanpersaud, the Privy Council, the High Courts, Court, the Privy Council, Court, the Privy Council, Lordships, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Nathuram, Bai Amrit

GPE: Bombay, Bombay, Harilal, Crump, Beaumont, Mitakshara, India, I.A., Mitakshara, pp, Mitakshara, Singh, A.I.R., Mohanund, pp, A.I.R., necessity.22, India, Molianund Mondul v., Seetharamanna, India, India

DATE: 1925, 1044, 1925, 1045, Panday, 1045, 1925, 1926, 1927, 1047, 1925, 1925, C.J. 5, Panday, 1856, 1926, Panday, 1856, 1925, 1925, 1913, 1928, 1931, 28, 1913, 1856, 1917, 1876, 1922, 1927, 1926, 1925, 1925, 1925, 1866, 1925, 1925, 1926, 1925, 1925, 68 or 69 years

CARDINAL: 499, two, 579, 49, 611, transferee, 2, 51, 499, 3., 3, 1899, 26, 51, 499 4, 568, 611, 499, 499, 6, 393, one, one, 1899, 26, 6, 393, 499, one, 9, 611, 499, 1912, 31, 213, 55, 39, 12, 228, 13, 529, 178, 611, 1, 27, 29, 1, 203, 204, 1899, 26, 1875, 1912, 31, 213, 55, 39, 17, two, 6, 393, 412):Upon, 18, 423, 1856, 6, 393, 1880, 1875, 2, 145, necessity.20, 1899, 26, 1890, 14, 1875, 1875, 1, 203, 204, 1890, 15, 499, 611, 499, 1, 1856, 6, 393, 499, 1856, 6, 393, 9, 297, 568, 10, 454, 499, 1856, 6, 393, 499, 1856, 6, 393, 1912, 31, 213, 1890, 14, 1875, 499, 1856, 6, 393, 499, 1856, 6, 393

PERCENT: 51 Bom.)One

LOC: Madras, Madras, Hunoomanpersaud Panday, Hunoomanpersaud Panday's

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, Hunooman, Bai Manik, 6 Cal 843, Bai Manik, Bai Manik, Bai Manik

FAC: Mohanund Mondul v.

WORK_OF_ART: Bench, 2 Cal 341, Hindu Law

EVENT: P.C. 11, P.C. 11

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //