Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Haji Shakoor Gany Vs. H.E. Hinde and Co. Ltd.

Decided On : Jan-14-1931

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 31, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 13, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 3, Clause 6, Section 28, the Indian Contract Act, Article 3, Section 3 of the Limitation Act, the Limitation Law, Section 28, the Limitation Act, Article 3, Clause 6, Section 28, the Indian Contract Act, the Sea Customs Act, Section 64, Section 167, Section 85 of the Act, Section 85, Article 120 of the Indian Limitation Act, Article 3, Clause 6, Article 3, Section 64, Section 167, the Sea Customs Act

PERSON: Blackwell, Nos, L.R., Exhibits C1, C3, interalia

NORP: J.1

DATE: June 27, 1930, 1078, 2 quarters, May 4, 1929, May 8, 1929, June 27, 1930, January 24,1930, 1924, one year, one year, 1913, three months, More than three months, three months, 64, 85, March 21, 1912, '17, six years, an earlier date, more than one year, January 13, 1931

CARDINAL: 27,398, 1, 1, 2, 26, 1, 9A, 1, 2, 1, 9A, 1, 1, 1, 344, 15, 352, 1, 2, 2, 17, 17, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 17, 1, 2.20

ORG: British India, the English Carriage of Goods, Baroda Spinning & Weaving Company, Limited, Satyanarayen Marine & Fire Insurance Company,, the S insurance company, Scott, follows:-The, Court, Customs, Customs, follows:-The, Customs, words:-A, the Master under Section 167, Customs, the Customs Authorities, the English Carriage of Goods, delivery.18, the Sea Customs Act, Court, the Customs Authorities

GPE: England, India

PRODUCT: C2

FAC: Sections 64 and 85

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //