Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Satgur Parsad Vs. Har NaraIn Das
Decided On : Jan-18-1932
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 2, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 65, the Indian Contract Act, Section 88, the Indian Trusts Act
PERSON: George Lowndes, Satgur Prasad, Mahant Har Narain Das, Moung Tha Hnyeen v. Moung Pan Nyo, L.R., L.R., Khajendra Narayan Singh, plaintiff.14, Blackburn, Wonham, conveyance.16, Mulhallen v. Marum, Majesty, Satgur Prasad, Mahant Har Narain Das
NORP: J.1
ORG: the Chief Court of Oudh, the Chief Court, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, him.2, Srimati, Robins, National Trust Co., Lordships, Board, Court, the Court of Appeal.7, Court, the Court of Appeal, Court, the Court of Appeal, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Oudh, Lordships, Kerr on Fraud, Saddlers' Co., filed.17, Bank of London, Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate Company, Lordships, Lordships, Satgur Prasad, the Chief Court of Oudh, the Chief Court
DATE: May 2, 1928, November 25,1924, 1927, 5154, two-days, 1927, approximately November 25, 1924, November25, 1924, November 25, 1924, 1863, 1863, 1843, eleven years, 1862, 10 H.L.C. 26, 1878, 121818, November 25, 1924, May 2, 1928, November, 1924
CARDINAL: one, 27, 166, 2, 985, two, three, five, 12, one, 469, 10, 420, 5, 15, 33, 154, 3, 386, twenty-fifth, 1
GPE: India, Rani, India, Tyrrell v.
ORDINAL: first, 6th
QUANTITY: 3 App