Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Satgur Parsad Vs. Har NaraIn Das

Decided On : Jan-18-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 2, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 65, the Indian Contract Act, Section 88, the Indian Trusts Act

PERSON: George Lowndes, Satgur Prasad, Mahant Har Narain Das, Moung Tha Hnyeen v. Moung Pan Nyo, L.R., L.R., Khajendra Narayan Singh, plaintiff.14, Blackburn, Wonham, conveyance.16, Mulhallen v. Marum, Majesty, Satgur Prasad, Mahant Har Narain Das

NORP: J.1

ORG: the Chief Court of Oudh, the Chief Court, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, him.2, Srimati, Robins, National Trust Co., Lordships, Board, Court, the Court of Appeal.7, Court, the Court of Appeal, Court, the Court of Appeal, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Oudh, Lordships, Kerr on Fraud, Saddlers' Co., filed.17, Bank of London, Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate Company, Lordships, Lordships, Satgur Prasad, the Chief Court of Oudh, the Chief Court

DATE: May 2, 1928, November 25,1924, 1927, 5154, two-days, 1927, approximately November 25, 1924, November25, 1924, November 25, 1924, 1863, 1863, 1843, eleven years, 1862, 10 H.L.C. 26, 1878, 121818, November 25, 1924, May 2, 1928, November, 1924

CARDINAL: one, 27, 166, 2, 985, two, three, five, 12, one, 469, 10, 420, 5, 15, 33, 154, 3, 386, twenty-fifth, 1

GPE: India, Rani, India, Tyrrell v.

ORDINAL: first, 6th

QUANTITY: 3 App

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //