Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Jamsetji Nassarwanji Ginvalla Vs. Hirjibhai Navroji Anklesaria
Decided On : Sep-19-1912
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 241, the Contract Act, Article 95 of the Limitation Act, Article 95, Section 234
PERSON: Basil Scott, Naoroji Nasserwanji Ginwalla, Jamshedji Nasserwanji Ginwalla, Ardeshir Nasserwanji Ginwalla, Naoroji Nasserwanji, Pestonji, Naoroji, Naoroji, Nasserwanji, Pestonji Nasserwanji Ginwala, Naoroji Nasserwanji Ginwala, Pestonji Nasserwanji Ginwala, Naoroji Nasserwanji, Naoroji, Naoroji, Naoroji, Naoroji, Edalji, Gandhi, Naoroji, Naoroji, Naoroji, Naoroji, Naoroji, Naoroji, Naoroji, Naoroji, plaint.13, Abdul Rahim v. Kir, Daji I.L.R., Mohun Gouli v., Dinonath Karmokar I.L.R., Tyabji, Naoroji, Moore, Naoroji, Tyabji, Tyabji, Jayakar, Williams, Johnson, Warwick, Manecksha Taleyarkhan, Pleader
GPE: Kt., Gujarat, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Dinbai, Bombay, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai, Maneckbai
ORG: Hirjibhoy Naoroji Anklesaria, Dinshaw Pestonji Ginwalla, Nasserwanji Hirjibhai Cotton Ginning Company.2, Court, Court, C.B. 516
ORDINAL: first, third, first, third, first, 26th, first
CARDINAL: two, three, two, two, half, about twenty-five years, 4, 5, 394, three, 1,04,000, 200, three hundred and sixty, 428, 17, ninety-five, 26, 10, 186, 49.14, 608, 222, 17
DATE: the 7th of February 1885, the 21st of January 1909, the year 1905, 1895, the year 1895, the 30th of November 1895, the 21th of May 1895, November 1895.6, the 30th of November 1195, 1905, the 21st of April 1909, October 1907, 1895, between 1885 and 1895, 1895, 1885, 1895, 1891, 1897, 1898, 1897, three years, 1897, 1898, 1905, 1895, 1895, March the 7th, 1895, 1856, 1898, 1909, about 1895, 1896
MONEY: nine per cent
PRODUCT: Calcutta
NORP: action.15