Semantic Analysis by spaCy
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-ii Vs. M/S. Veekaylal Investment Co. P. Ltd.
Decided On : Feb-08-2001
Court : Mumbai
LAW: section 260A, section 115J, the Income Tax Act?3, section 45, section 28, the Income Tax Act, section 115J, section 115J, the Income Tax Act, section 45, Section 45, Chapter 12B., the Companies Act, section 45, the Income Tax Act, the Companies Act, section 45, the Income Tax Act, section 115J, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Income Tax Act, the Companies Act, section 115J, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Companies Act, the Income Tax Act, section 45, the Income Tax Act, the Companies Act, section 115J, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act
PERSON: S. H. Kapadia, Manish Builders, Bacchubhai Parekh, S. N. Apte, Desai, Desai, Desai, Desai, Jasani
ORG: Tribunal, Department, Income Tax Appeal No, FACTS, M/s. Veekaylal Investments Co. Pvt. Ltd., AO, AO, CIT (Appeals, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Judgment of the Special Bench, Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd., Income Tax, Department, -Senior Counsel, Department, Schedule VI, inter alia, Tribunal, Schedule VI, Company, Pegler, the Judgment of the Special Bench, Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd., Tribunal, Company, Company, Company, Department
CARDINAL: 27, 4, 29.120, 2.70, 12,76,119/-, 5, less than 3O%, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 311, 7, one, 2, II, II
DATE: the Assessment Year 1989-90, the previous year, Year 1989-90, the period 31st March, 1989, 1987, 1956, 1956, under section 115J.6, 1987, the previous year, 1669, 2(b, 1651
GPE: asscssee, Spicer, C.C.
QUANTITY: 36,693 sq. yards
PRODUCT: Calcutta
PERCENT: 30%, less than 30%, 30%, less than 30%, less than 30%, 30%, less than 30%
EVENT: Parts II, Partk II
ORDINAL: first, first
WORK_OF_ART: Fourteenth Edition, Fourteenth Edition