Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hari Ram Gupta and Ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Decided On : Jan-30-2015

Court : Delhi

LAW: Order XII Rule 6, Section 151 CPC, Order XII Rule 6, Order XII Rule 6, Order XII Rule 6, Order XII Rule 6

DATE: December 16, 2014, January 30, 2015 +, 28.05.1992, 28.05.1992, 28.05.1992, 20.07.2006, 21.03.1992, 16.04.1992, 28.05.1992, 28.05.1992, 16.04.1992, 19.11.1992, March, 1993, 2006, 2006, 27.08.2010, 27.08.2010, 31st July, 2009, 31st July, 2009, 5, 2015

GPE: CS(OS, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, IA, CS(OS

ORG: HARI RAM GUPTA & ORS, VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR, Smt, Agreement, Smt, MOU, No.2 & 3, Smt, MOU, GPA, GPA, Court, Local, IA No.14809/2008, Court, Special Leave Petition, the Supreme Court, CPC, IA No.14809/2008, Court, the Written Statement, the Appellant/Defendant, Respondents/Plaintiffs, CPC, Appellant, Respondent Nos.1, MOU, MOU, the Application of the Respondent Nos, CPC, Emphasis

PERSON: Ankur Gosain, Rajinder Mathur, JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, Nos, Main Bazaar, Parbati Devi, Parbati Devi, Parbati Devi, Parbati Devi, Will, Main Bazaar, 06.04.2010, Order, Order, Order, Order XII Rule, JANUARY30

CARDINAL: 1, No.3, No.2, No.3, one, No.2, No.2, 85, approximately 31.5 sq.yards, 4.5, 63, 2, No.3, No.3, 1/3rd, 127, 31.5 sq.yards, No.3, 158.5, 212, 53.5, No.2, No.2, No.2, 127, No.2, 28.05.1992, 50,000/-, No.2, 31.5 sq.yards, 2, No.3, No.2, 43.33, No.2, No.2, No.2, half, 15, 63, 31.07.2009, No.2, 6.4.2010, 63, No.2, 22.11.2010.5, No.2, 11.01.2012, No.2, No.2, 7, two, 1, 2, 18‟x 63‟, 1 to 3, 127, 1, 2, two, three, 8, 6, 6.2.2015

PRODUCT: No.1 & 2, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

LOC: Single

FAC: the Roster Bench

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //