Fazalally Jivaji Raja Vs. Khimji Poonja and Co.

Decided On : Aug-30-1933

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 15, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 11, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 2, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 19, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 19, Section 19, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 4, Section 11, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 10, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, the English Arbitration Act, Indian Arbitration Act, Section 12, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 4, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 28, Section 4, the Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Rule 51, the Bombay Act, the Arbitration Act, section 6, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 2(a, the Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 11, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 80A, Section 11, Section 11, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 11, Section 14, the Indian Arbitration Act, Article 61

PERSON: Rangnekar, J.1, Broach, Boyagist, Haji Abdulla v. Stamp, Esher M. Rule, Earl Loreburn, Sumner, Coltman, Gopalji Kuverji, Morarji Jeram, L.R., Esher M.R., Surajmull v. Chandmull, Ramdutt Ramkissen, Setalvad, Setalvad, Justice Kanga, Dharamsey Jetha, Justice Kanga, Keighley, Desai, Coltman, Keighley, Award, Setalvad, L.R. 2 Scotch App, Cairns, Russell, Award, Keighley, Balmukund Ramchandra, Setalvad, Blackburn JJ, Middleton, Justice Coleridge, Coleridge J., Beck, Jackson, Cresswell, Award, Middleton, Coltman, Nand Ram v. Fakir, Thammiraju v., Ma Sin v. Ma Pu I.L.R., Setalvad, Setalvad, Setalvad, Simpson, L.R., de novo, Setalvad

ORG: the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., Langley & Co., Association, Court, the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., Association, Association, the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., Association, Association, Court, the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., inter alia, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Association, Court, Court, Court, provided:.All, the High Court, Austrian Lloyd Steamship Company, Gresham Life Assurance Society, the Courts of Budapest, Kirchner & Co., Gruban, Association, Court, Keighley, Maxsted & Co., Durant & Co., the London Corn Trade Association, the London Corn Trade Association, the London Corn Trade Association, Produce Brokers Company, Limited, Olympia Oil and Cake Co., Lordships, the Appeal Committee, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Keighley, Maxsted & Co., Durant & Co., Q.B. 405, Heeralal & Co., Joakim and Co., Court, the committee of appeal, Chandamull, Donald Campbell & Co., C.W.N., Lordships of the Privy Council, E.D. Sassoon, Co., Court, the Appeal Court, the Cotton Contracts Board, the Cotton Contracts Board, Court, Shah Ag, the Cotton Contracts Board, Board, Board, the Court of Appeal, Keighley, Maxsted & Co., Durant & Co., Court, Shah Ag, the Appeal Court, the Government of India Act, Russell on Arbitration, Court, Counsel, Arbitration, the London Corn Trade Association, the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., the Board of Directors, the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., Board, the Appeal Court, Radhakison Gopikison, the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., Morgan v. Boult, Court, Cockburn C.J., Denman C.J., Court, Russell on Arbitration, Russell on Arbitration, Re Flaws, Q.B. 845, Little v. Newton, Stalworth v. Inns, I.L.R., Keighley, Maxsted & Co., Durant & Co., Association, the East India Cotton Association, Ltd., Brook and Delcomyn, Erle C.J., Association, Moseley, Beck v. Sargent

DATE: April-May, 1933, November 22, 1932, 39, February 21, 1933, that day, March 6, 1933, that day, March 15, 1933, March 15, February 21, February 21, that day, March 17, 1933, March 17, 1933, March 23, 1933, the following day, March 24, February 21, March 15, March 15, February 21, February 21, March 15, March 17, March 15, March 17, February 21, March 17, February 21, March 15 and 17, 38, ten days, 1903, 1889, 1893, c. 49, 1889, 1889, 1889, 1899, 1919, 1893, 1919, 1919, Rule 51, 1889, 1875, 1930)32BOMLR1319, one day, the following day, 1863, 1845, 1857, 1845, 1841, 1844, 1885, 1883, 1929, 71524, 1893, the last day, March 17, that day, 1873, 1812

CARDINAL: 38, two, 2, one, 3., 1, three, 2, two, 3, one, 4, two, 5, two, 6, six, three, two, two, 39, 1, 1909, 413, 38.11, 1, two, two, twenty-five, five, four, five, five, 52, 407):I, twenty-five, five, five, twenty-five, 1916, 1, 315):13, 332):Arbitration, 809, 21, 1, 1916, 23, 15, two, 431, 535, six, one, 538):I, 36, one, twenty-five, five, six, six, two, 11, three, one, 6, one, 852):To, 5, 404, 406):It, two, 1, three, two, two, 700, 209,-speaking, 6, 437, 351, 2, 509, 13, 466, three, 523, 313, 1, one, hundreds, 1864)16, 414, one, two, one, two, 16, 226, six, 4, 232, six, six, six

ORDINAL: first, secondly, first, first, second, second, first, first, second, second, first, first, second, second, first, first, first, second, third, firstly, second, first, third, first, third, first, first, second

GPE: England, England, Bombay, Budapest, Budapest, England, England, India, Sukhdev Ramdeo, England, P.C., Bapiraju

NORP: English, French, English, English, Parish, Indian

LANGUAGE: English, English

PRODUCT: 1 Ch, F, 707, Co.1, 845 Lord

LOC: Act.12

EVENT: W.R. 265