Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Lakshmibai Anant Kondkar Vs. Jagannath Ravji Kondkar

Decided On : Dec-04-1931

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section II, Section 11, Rule 18, Section 54 of the Code, Section 11, Sections 101 102, the Indian Evidence Act

PERSON: John Beaumont, Order XX, Order XX, Atmaram Bhashar v., Parashram Ballal, L.R., Justice Heaton, Muhammad Ishaq Khan v., MuhammadRustam Ali Khan, Broomfield, J.6, Atmaram Bhashar v., Parashram Ballal, L.R., Order XX, Order XX

GPE: Kt., I.L.R., Doraiswami, Subramania, I.L.R.

ORG: Thana, Court, Court, Court, the Madras High Court, the Allahabad High Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, Court, Regular Suit, Court

CARDINAL: eighty, 4,800, 400, one, 3,000, 3,750, 12, 5, 12, two, 954, 22, 982, 959):-The, 3., 188, 292, 1, 954, 22, 982, 12, 23, 12, 3, 103, one, one, 3

DATE: the year 1927, the year 1927 28, 1926, March 29, 1927, March 1927, 1920, 1917, 1918, 1926, 1920, 98 of 1926, 1927, a week, January 1928

ORDINAL: first, first, secondly, first, first, first

EVENT: the Civil Procedure Code

WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Subordinate

NORP: Appendix

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //