Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Lakshmibai Anant Kondkar Vs. Jagannath Ravji Kondkar
Decided On : Dec-04-1931
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section II, Section 11, Rule 18, Section 54 of the Code, Section 11, Sections 101 102, the Indian Evidence Act
PERSON: John Beaumont, Order XX, Order XX, Atmaram Bhashar v., Parashram Ballal, L.R., Justice Heaton, Muhammad Ishaq Khan v., MuhammadRustam Ali Khan, Broomfield, J.6, Atmaram Bhashar v., Parashram Ballal, L.R., Order XX, Order XX
GPE: Kt., I.L.R., Doraiswami, Subramania, I.L.R.
ORG: Thana, Court, Court, Court, the Madras High Court, the Allahabad High Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, Court, Regular Suit, Court
CARDINAL: eighty, 4,800, 400, one, 3,000, 3,750, 12, 5, 12, two, 954, 22, 982, 959):-The, 3., 188, 292, 1, 954, 22, 982, 12, 23, 12, 3, 103, one, one, 3
DATE: the year 1927, the year 1927 28, 1926, March 29, 1927, March 1927, 1920, 1917, 1918, 1926, 1920, 98 of 1926, 1927, a week, January 1928
ORDINAL: first, first, secondly, first, first, first
EVENT: the Civil Procedure Code
WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Subordinate
NORP: Appendix