SumikIn Bussan (Hong Kong) International Limited Vs. Manharlal Trikamdas Mody and

Decided On : May-02-2006

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 59, the Indian Easements Act, Clauses 23, the Indian Easements Act, the Indian Easements Act, the Indian Easements Act, the Indian Easements Act, Section 60, The Indian Easements Act, Section 60, Section 60, the Easements Act, the Easements Act, Section 60, the Easements Act, the Indian Easements Act, Section 64, Section 60, Section 60, the Indian Easements Act, Section 60, Section 60, the Indian Easements Act, Section 59, the Indian Easements Act, Section 64, the Indian Easements Act, Section 59, the Indian Easements Act, Section 64, the Indian Easements Act, Section 59, the Indian Easements Act, Section 52 of the Act, Section 60, Section 62, Section 60, Section 60, Section 60, Section 60, Section 60 of the Act, Section 64, the Indian Easements Act, Section 60, The Indian Easements Act, Section 64, The Indian Easements Act, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64, the Indian Easements Act, The Indian Easements Act, Section 64, The Indian Easements Act, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64, Section 60, Section 59, the Indian Easements Act, Section 17(1)(b, the Registration Act, Section 52, Section 59, the Indian Easement Act, Section 52, the Indian Easement Act, Section 59, the Indian Easement Act, Section 59, Section 59, Section 60, the Indian Easements Act, Section 59, Section 59, Section 60 of the Act, Section 59, Section 59, Section 59, Section 59, the Easements Act, Section 59, Easements Act, Section 60.39, Section 59, Section 56, Section 59, Clause 28, Section 58(g, Section 67, the T.P. Act, Section 100, the T.P. Act, Section 58(g, the Chamber Summons, the Stamp Act, Clauses 19 and 28, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 55, Section 55, Section 100, Section 1, Section 67, the T.P. Act, Section 67, the T.P. Act, Section 67, the T.P. Act, Section 29(1, Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Easements Act, Section 24

PERSON: S.J. Vazifdar, Silver Arch, the Sheriff of Mumbai, Licensed Premises, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensed Premises, Licensee, Licensee, Licensed Premises, Samdani, Dada, Dada, license.-When, revocable.when revocable.when revocable, Licensee, Dada, Anr, L.J. 35, Ram Sarup Gupta, M.F. De Souza, Sohan Lal AIR, Dada, M.F. De Souza, Mudholkar, J., Juris Secundum, Sohan Lal AIR, Liggins v. Inge, Ahmedabad, Moti Lal Hirabhai Spinning, Ahemedabad, Ganga Sahai v. Badrul, Aldin, L.J. Ch, Wilson v. Tavener, L.J. Ch, L. J. C. P. 154, Kerrison, Smith, Coomar Singha v., Ram Coomar, Ram Sarup Gupta, Ram Sarup Gupta, M.F. De Souza, Sohan Lal, Ram Sarup Gupta's, Dada, Dada, Dada, M.F. De Zouaves, Ram Sarup Gupta's, M.F. De Souza, Ram Sarup Gupta's, Kumar Bhargava, Dada, Kumar Bhargava, Appellant, Muhammad Ziaul Haqu v., Standard Vacuum Oil, Sohan Lal, M.F. De Souza, Dada, Sekseria, M.F. De Souza, Ram Sarup Gupta, Dada, Hanifa Jusab, Memon Dadu A. Gani, Sardharia, Mudholkar J.'s, M. F. De Souza's, M.F. De Souza's, M.F. De Souza, Sohan Lal AIR, Ram Sarup Gupta, Ram Sarup Gupta's, Dada, Ram Sarup Gupta, M.F. De Souza, Ram Sarup Gupta's, Mudholkar, M.F. De Souza's, Dada, Dada, Dada, M.F. De Souza, Ram Sarup Gupta, Ram Sarup Gupta's, Tulzapurkar, Licensee, lien, Anr, Madras, Ram Sarup Gupta, Ram Sarup Gupta's, Kumar Bhargava, Ram Sarup Gupta's, Dada, Anr, Dada, four.36, Ras Behari Lal v., AIR1934All517 .38, Lau, Lau, Balchand v. Kaluram Gulabchand, Kaushalendra Rao, Rahim Bax v. Samsu, Dada, Dada, Dada, Samdani, Samdani, Samdani, Samdani, lien, Begum, Samdani, Bapuji Chudasama, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Licensed Premises, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Samdani, Samdani, Samdani, Licensee, Landlord, Licensee, Licensee, Anr, Samdani, Licensee, Licensee, Samdani, Samdani, Shankar Saxena v. State, Anr, Lien, lien, lien, Samdani, Submissions, Samdani, Samdani, -Indar Sen v. Naubat Singh ILR, Anr, Samdani, Samdani, mortgage.(Madhao Rao, Gulam Mohiuddin AIR, Kanna Kurup, Varma Rajah, Hathika, Samdani, Samdani, Samdani, Samdani, Samdani, R.H. Shah, H.J. Joshi, Toor, Samdani, Makkan Anr, Dada, Toor, Dada, Sekseria, Toor, Samdani, Sekseria, Toor, Toor, Toor, Dada

NORP: J.1, British

LOC: Single, the North Western Railway, Respondent, Respondent, Mt. Maharaja, Single, Single

WORK_OF_ART: the Chamber Summons, the Chamber Summons, Appellant, Ramchand Malukchand ILR, 4th Edition, Volume 28, The Chamber Summons

CARDINAL: 2, 2, 8.10.2001.PRELIMINARY, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 201, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 4, 2, 8.10.2001, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 26, 2, 5, 28, 19, 28, 1, 2, 2, 1, 8, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2.9, 2, 1, 2, 28, 28, 1, 59 and 60, 2. 10, two, 2, 2, 1. 11, 64, 59, transferee, transferee, 60.60.60, 64, three, transferee, 13, 1, 2, 14, three, 1987]2SCR805, 40, two, only two, 815-16, one-third, two-thirds, only one-third, 12, 12, two, 7, 9, 699, 53, 930, 202, 676, two, 13, 2, 437, 63, 601, 1, 598, 70, 263, 83, 10, 2, 445, 66, 16, 640, 680, 1987]2SCR805, 13, 12, 15, 15, 22, 11, one, 12, two, 17, 1987]2SCR805, three, 19, One, three, 7, one, 9, One, 63, 64, two, two, two, two, 21, 22, 40, 1987]2SCR805, 23, 62, 9, 24, 25, 26, transferee, 27, 1987]2SCR805, 28, 29, 9, 11, one, transferee, 216).30, more than one, 31, 1987]2SCR805, transferee, 33, 34, transferee, 56, 57, transferee, transferee, transferee, 355, 17, 6, transferee, 18, transferee, 2, two, 42, 2, 43, 2, 2, 26, 28, 26, 2, 47, 28, 24, 28, 2, 2, 2, 50, one, 2, 2, 2, 8.10.2001, 51, 1970]1SCR658, 346, 19, 100, 419, 9, 1, 2, one, 19, 28, more than one, 2, 8, 56, 2, 2, 8, 8, 57, 2, 59, 10, 2, 3, three, 2, 2, 33, three, one, one, two, 2, 2, 62, 2, 2, 63, 2, 64, 2, 2, 2, 2, 65, 2, 2, 66, 2, 23, 23, 68, 2, 69, four, 26, 71, 72, 16, 1, 2, 73, 7, 553, 74.(a, 121, 344, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 78, 2, One, 2, 79, 2, 2, 80, 2, 81, 2, 82, 45, only one, 1, 83, 2, 1, 2, 7, 84, 8.10.2001, 2

ORG: 31.5.2002, the High Court, Court of First Instance, Execution Application, Applicant, Chamber Summons, the ING BANK, Chamber Summons, Clauses 19, the Security Deposit, Licensors, Security Deposit, the Leave and License Agreement, the Bank Guarantee, Security Deposit, Appellant, Clauses 23, Sections 59 and 60, Sections 59, Grantor, Court, Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd., Diamant Borat India Private Ltd., LJ, HSBC, The Supreme Court, Bishun Narain Inter College and Ors, Court, Childrens Education Uplift Society, Dominion of India, P & h, Childrens Education Uplift Society, the Supreme Court, Defendants, Plaintiff, Court, Court, the Bombay Rent Act, the City Civil Court, Court, Court, P & H, the Supreme Court, the Judicial Committee, Wellington Corporation, Gujarat Ginning, Lehimer Clark Muirhead and Co., Smart v. Jones, Peacock on Easement, 3rd Edn., the Court of Equity, the Supreme Court, Bishun Narain Inter College and Ors, the Calcutta High Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Bishun Narain Inter College, Childrens Education Uplift Society's, Dominion of India, Court, Division Bench, Dominion of India, The Supreme Court, Dominion of India, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Respondent/Defendant, the Supreme Court, Das, Bombay High Court, Childrens Education Uplift Society, Appellant, Dominion of India, the Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Gujarat High Court, Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Gujarat High Court, Court, Childrens Education Uplift Society, Dominion of India, P & H, the Supreme Court, Bishun Narain Inter College and Ors, the Gujarat High Court, the Supreme Court, Dominion of India, the Supreme Court, Sections 59 and 60, Court, HSBC, Childrens Education Uplift Society, Bishun Narain Inter College and Ors, M. F. De Souza's, Dominion of India, the Supreme Court, HSBC, Leave and, Licence Agreement, Licensees, the Leave and Licence Agreement, the Leave and Licence Agreement, Leave and Licence Agreement, the Leave and Licence Agreement, Kashiprasad Beharilal Shukla, Madhya Pradesh, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Leave and Licence Agreement, the Leave and Licence Agreement, the Leave and Licence Agreement, the Security Deposit Agreement, the Security Deposit Agreement, Court, the Leave and Licence Agreement, Agreement, HSBC, Bishun Narain Inter College and Ors, The Supreme Court, Raja Ram, Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, HSBC, Akhai Kunwar, AIR 1915, the Allahabad High Court, Bhola Nath and Ors, L. Rajhubar Dayal, AIR 1946 Oudh, Bhairon, Reliance, Katiar, Clauses 24, the Transfer of Property Act, the Transfer of Property Act, Registrar, State Bank of Travancore, the Supreme Court, State, the Privy Council, the Transfer of Property Act, Bank of India Ltd., Cowasjee AIR 1955, Court, Court, Sate for India, Council ILR, The Licensed Premises, the Licensed Premises, the Licensed Premises, Clauses 7, Clauses 7, Clauses 7, the Licensed Premises, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, The Competent Authority, Clause 33, Licensors, the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, Chamber Summons, Chamber Summons, the Supreme Court, U.P., The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Stroud's Judicial Dictionary, Great Eastern Railway v. Lords Trustees, AC, the Allahabad High Court, the Full Court, the Patna High Court, Thakur Prasad v. Raghubir Prasad, the Rajasthan High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Parvathi, Court, Appellants, the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, Bye-Laws 39, the Model Bye-Laws, Court, Flat, the Security Deposit, License, costs.v

GPE: the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, US, Rs.3,48,98,644.84, Mumbai, N.V., Mumbai, Hongkong, Corpus, pp, India, India, Primmer, India, AIR1964Guj44, Saheb Ram, Mathuri, India, Manoolal, M.C., Chacko, Kalabhai, Triveni, Halsbury, Scotland, Ramdayal, Hong Kong

MONEY: 618,331.26, two per cent

DATE: 26.3.2003, 21.5.2004, 25.5.2005, 28, month, 31.7.2003.7, 31.7.2003, 31.7.2003 i.e., the twenty two months, monthly, 60, 1998, 1998, 1882, 40, five years, five years, five years, 13, 1831, 1884, 1942, 1894, 1901, 1864, 1897, 13, five years, months, 13, 18, '9, 1882, 64, 1882, 1882, Licensor, 1931, 35, 1930, 1950, 1951, Clause 28, 44, the next sentence.45, 46, 1882, 49, 1882, 54, 1905, 8, 58, 1999, 1999, 1999, 1999, 1999, 1999, all these years, 1902, 70, 1992)IILLJ23SC, 17, 1890, 1909, 1885, 75, 1990, 1920, 1999, ten weeks, today

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Licensors, Licensors, Licensors, Appellant, Appellant, 762, Appellant, Vendor, Agreement, Respondent, Respondent, Licensors, Agreement, Licensors, Agreement, Licensors, Appellant, Appellant, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, The Full Bench, Appellant

FAC: Nepan Sea Road, Railway, Sections 59, the Licensed Premises

EVENT: Clause 25, Clause 28, L.T. 271, Clause 28, Clause 28, Clause 28

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, third, first, Thirdly, Firstly, secondly, Firstly, first, Firstly, third, Firstly, Secondly, Firstly, Secondly, first, first, first, second, first, second, second, Firstly, second, second, first, first, second

PERCENT: 2%, 2%, 2%

TIME: 31.7.2003 i.e.