Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Patiala State Bank, in Re.

Decided On : Oct-08-1940

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 66(2, the Government Trading Taxation Act, Section 2, Section 2, the Indian Companies Act, Section 25, the Finance Act, Section 65, Section 3, section 65, Section 65, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, the Said Act Substantially, Section 65, Section 2(3, Section 42 and/or Section 43, Section 2(3, Section 65, Section 2 of Act III of, Section 2 of Act III, Section 2, Sections 42 and, Section 2(1

CARDINAL: 1, 1940.)BEAUMONT, 1, 2, 3, 419, 1, 2, 3, 4, 66,720, 5, 2, 41, 419, 2, 158, 2, three, 1, 2

NORP: Indian, British, British, British, British, Indian, Indian, British, Indian, British, British, British Indian, British, British Indian, British, British, British, British, British, Indian, British, British, British, British, British, British, British, British, British, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, British, British, Indian, British, Indian

ORG: the Patiala State Bank, the Patiala State Bank, the Patiala State, the Patiala State', the Ruler of the Patiala State, the Government of the State, the Patiala State Bank, the Patiala State Bank, the Patiala State Bank, the Government Trading Taxation Act, the Government of India, the Government of India, British India, Majestys Dominions, the Patiala State, State, Dominion Government, a High Court, the Dominion Government, the Dominion Government, Parliament, Royal Charter, Letters Patent, Dominion Government, Sections 3 and 4, Dominion Governments, the Government of India Act, The Indian Legislature, the Indian Legislature, the Government of India Act, British India, the Government of India, the Patiala State Bank, the Patiala State Bank, the Government of India Securities, Bank, the Patiala State Bank, the Patiala State, the Patiala State Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, the Patiala State Bank, the Government of India, the Government of India Act, State, State, the Government of India, the Government of India, Legislature, the Government of India, Majestys Government, Dominion Government, the Government of India, Dominion Government, State, British India, British India, the Government of India Act, the Government of India, Dominion, the Patiala State Bank, the British Government, The Patiala State, Dominion, the Statu Bank, Whitney v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, the Patiala State Bank, the Patiala State Bank, State, State, the Government of India, State, State, the Gaekwar of Baroda 1 (1912, Court, the Patiala State Bank

GPE: Maharaja, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Great Britain, Great Britain, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India

DATE: two years, 1935-36, 1936-37, 1926, 1922, 1922, 1815, 1847 and, 1860, 1926.It, 1929, 52, 1922, 1913, 1926, 1926, 1926, 1925, 1919, 1926, 1926, 1926, 1922, the year 1934-35, 1926, 1919, 1926, 1922, 1929, 1926, 1926, 1926, 1929, 52, 1926, 1926, 1926, 1815, 43, 1926, 1926

TIME: a valid Act

LOC: British India, British India, British India, British India, British India', British India, British India

PERSON: Majestys, Majestys, Ram Prasad, Mussoorie, Ruler, Ruler, Majestys, Majesty, Raja, Majesty, A.C. 37, Dunedin, Ruler, Statham v. Statham

PRODUCT: Ram Prasad 1, the Act III of, Ram Prasad 1, Ram Prasad 1, the Act III of

ORDINAL: first, secondly, second, third, second, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //