Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shri Satyadhyana Tirth Vs. Bhujang Chintaman Nadgauda

Decided On : Dec-12-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 134 or Article 144 of Schedule II, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 134, Article 144

PERSON: Baker, J.1, Swami, Krishnacharya Garlpad, Nos, Nilmony Singh v., Jagabandhu Roy I.L.R., Balusami Ayyar, L.R., Exhibits, Nos, Nilmony Singh v., Jagabandhu Roy, Balusami Ayyar, Balusami Ayyar, Madras, Rama Reddy v., Rangadasan I.L.R., Velu Pandaram, L.R., Vidya, Balusami Ayyar, L.R.

DATE: about forty or fifty years ago, 1929, 1924, 1896, 1921, 75, 74, 76, 1892, 1857, about fifty years ago, 1925, 1899, twelve years, twelve years', 1921, 6296

CARDINAL: one, 8, two, 1, 2, 536, 831, 24, two, one, 855, 855, 543, 548, 271 2, 279):-Their, 831, 24

GPE: Garlpad, I.L.R., Bombay, I.L.R.

ORG: Belgaum, the Privy Council, Vidya Varuthi, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Privy Council, Vidya Varuthi, Privy Council, the Privy Council, Vidya Varuthi, the Privy Council, Privy Council, Gnanasambanda Pandara Sannadhi, The Privy Council, High Courts, the Privy Council, Court

NORP: Hindu, Hindu

ORDINAL: second, first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //