Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Shri Satyadhyana Tirth Vs. Bhujang Chintaman Nadgauda
Decided On : Dec-12-1932
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Article 134 or Article 144 of Schedule II, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 134, Article 144
PERSON: Baker, J.1, Swami, Krishnacharya Garlpad, Nos, Nilmony Singh v., Jagabandhu Roy I.L.R., Balusami Ayyar, L.R., Exhibits, Nos, Nilmony Singh v., Jagabandhu Roy, Balusami Ayyar, Balusami Ayyar, Madras, Rama Reddy v., Rangadasan I.L.R., Velu Pandaram, L.R., Vidya, Balusami Ayyar, L.R.
DATE: about forty or fifty years ago, 1929, 1924, 1896, 1921, 75, 74, 76, 1892, 1857, about fifty years ago, 1925, 1899, twelve years, twelve years', 1921, 6296
CARDINAL: one, 8, two, 1, 2, 536, 831, 24, two, one, 855, 855, 543, 548, 271 2, 279):-Their, 831, 24
GPE: Garlpad, I.L.R., Bombay, I.L.R.
ORG: Belgaum, the Privy Council, Vidya Varuthi, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Privy Council, Vidya Varuthi, Privy Council, the Privy Council, Vidya Varuthi, the Privy Council, Privy Council, Gnanasambanda Pandara Sannadhi, The Privy Council, High Courts, the Privy Council, Court
NORP: Hindu, Hindu
ORDINAL: second, first, first