Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Tyebhoy Essofalli Thingna Vs. the Collector
Decided On : Jun-25-1943
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 6C, Section 3, Section 6C, Section 6C, Section 6C, Section 6C, Section 6C.6, Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, Section 115, the Civil Procedure Code, Rule 98, Rule 99 or Rule 101, Section 115, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3 of Act XLII, Section 3
ORG: Lokur, the Matekati Charitable Properties Trust, Maskati Charitable Dispensary and Hospitals, the Surat Court, Court, the Register of Wakfs, Court, the Register of Wakfs, Register, Sections 6F, Court, the District Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the Court of a District Judge, Court, the High Court, Wazir Hasan C.J., the Surat Court
NORP: J.1
PERSON: Ahmedabad, Surat, Surat, Surat, Karimmiya Hamdumiya v., Jafarali Bawamiya, Order XXI, Order XXI, Thakor, Mitter J., Ali Bakhtiyar, Khondkar Altaf, Mutawalli, Ashiq Hussain, Luck
DATE: 1923, 1935, July 6, 1911, October 16, 1940, 1913, 1923, 1923, 1923, 1908, 1923, 1933, 1913, 1923, 1923, 1929, 1913, 1923
PRODUCT: Bombay Act XVIII, Rule 101
GPE: Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, Hussain, I.L.R.
CARDINAL: less than half, eight, at least half, 667, 103, 98, 99, one, half, 790, 429, at least half
WORK_OF_ART: 'The Maskati Charitable Dispensary and Hospitals'
FAC: Mussalman, Saiyed Shabbir Husain v. Shaikh