Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Vs. Gopal Vajinath Manohar.

Decided On : Apr-01-1935

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 23(3, section 34, Income Tax Act, section 34, Income Tax Act, section 34, Income Tax Act, section 34, section 34, section 34, section 34, Section 34 of the Act, section 34

GPE: BEAUMONT, Bombay, India

PERSON: C. J. - This, Burma, U LU NYU, Madras

ORG: Income Tax, the Indian Income Tax Act, Nasik, Income Tax, the Rangoon High Court, the Income Tax Officer, Calcutta High Court, The Anglo Persian Oil Co., Madras High Court, Income Tax, the Income Tax Officer, the Income Tax Officer, Income Tax, Income Tax, Income Tax, Income Tax, Income Tax Officer, Income Tax, Original, the Rangoon High Court, Income Tax, the Anglo Persian Oil Company India Ltd.

DATE: the year, 1932-33, the next year, the last two month of the previous year, the year 1932-33, the year 1987, 1922, the year 1932, Samvat 1987, any year, the previous year, the previous year, the subsequent year, the earlier year, the taxing year, the year

MONEY: fifteen per cent, three per cent, four per cent, ten per cent, one per cent

PERCENT: five percent, three percent

CARDINAL: three, 2,000, 1,000, two, One, 121, 845

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, second, first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //