Charanjit Singh Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise

Decided On : Sep-20-1989

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Section 9(1)(d, Chapter No, Chapter No, Rule 173-G of the Central Excise Rules, Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 2(b, the Central Boards of Revenue Act, Section 9, Chapter III, Section 18, Section 21, Section 200, Section 195, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 200, Section 200 of the Code, Section 200, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 2(b, Section 200, Section 200, Section 200, section 200, Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 203, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 200, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 200, Section 203, Section 203, Section 200, Section 200.10, Section 204, Section 204, Section 203, Section 204, Section 190, Section 204, Section 204, Section 200, Section 227, Section 192, Section 193, Section 195(1)(c, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 463, Section 471, the Adjudication Order (Original, Section 9-AA(1, Section 9-AA, Section 9-C of the Act, Section 276-C and Section 277 of the Act, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code

CARDINAL: 1, 4, 5, 433, 1 to 3, 6 to 12, 9(1)(bb, 9(1)(bbb, 9(1)(i, 9, 1, 22, 1, 4, two, 22, Two, two, four, 134, 4, 1, 1, 4, 1, 15,10,854.30, 6, 1, 22, 1, 1, RT-12, 4, 3 to 12, 1, 2 to 12, 1, 1, 173, 52, 173, 173, 556, 10-8-1977, 24, 1, 203, 204, 1973]2SCR66, 22, 6, 8, 1964]1SCR639, 1972CriLJ1037, 1971CriLJ1110, 203, 129, 12, two, one, 1988CriLJ1095, 1979CriLJ154, 1976CriLJ1732, 1, 13, 5, 22, 31, 41, 42, 28, 38, 264, 37, 341, 5, 909, 17-6-1987, 1984]149ITR696(SC, 29, two, four

PERSON: Nos, Nos, ps., Nos, Nos, A. R. Gupte, Order, K. Krishna Warrier v. T. R. Velunny, Mukherjee v. State, Krishna Warrier's, N. B. Mukherjee's, S. D. Gupta, Nirmaljit Singh Hoon, Chandra Deo Singh v. Prakash, Moti Ram, Directors, Haridas Mundra, Order, Santanu Ray 1988, Excise Licence, Criminal, Amritsar, Janak Rani, R.G. Sethi, Jayappan, S. R. Perumal, P. Jayappan's, Jayappan, B. S. Hebbar, Jayappan, Puranik J., Jayappan, B. S. Hebbar's, Jayappan, Jayappan, Nagawwa v.

DATE: 1987, 1944, 22nd January, 1986, monthly, May 1986, May, 1986, 52, 54, 47, 49, 1944, 1944, 1963, 21 days, 1952, 1949, 7, 1988, 1989, June 30, 1989, 1988, Para 44, 28th January, 1987, 1944, 1982, 1114, 1985, '16

ORG: the Court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Bombay, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Sections 193 r/w. 192, the Central Excises, the Central Excises Tariff, Account, GP-I., the Central Excises, Central Excise, ps, Magistrate, Order, Petitioners, Magistrate, Complaint, the Central Excises, the Central Excise Department, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Police, Customs, Police Station, the Assistant Collector, the Collector for Central Excise, Complaint, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Magistrate, Magistrate's Court, Reliance, Kalu Munchi & Others, Court, the District Magistrate, Inquiries, the Commissions of Inquiry Act, District Magistrate, the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court, Special Court, the Central Excises, the Allahabad High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Counsel for the Petitioners, Magistrate, Magistrate, Counsel for the Petitioners, Sections 202, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Reliance, Petitioners, Magistrate, D.N. Bhattacharjee &, West Bengal & Anr, Magistrate, Balraj Khanna & Others, the Allahabad High Court, J. S. Huja & Others, Magistrate, Reliance, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, Patna High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Companies.12, T. J. Stephen & Ors, M/s. Parle Bottling Co., P) Ltd. & Ors, Magistrate, Company, Union of India, Prafulla Kumar Samal & Anr, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, State of W.B., Magistrate, the Supreme Court, Court, the Bombay Company, Central Excises, the Collector of Central Excises, the Divisional Assistant Collector, Factil Electronics P. Ltd., Collector - 1987, ELT, ELT, M/s. Pure Drinks Pvt., the Central Excises, Reliance, Income Tax Reports, the Supreme Court, the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd., the Appellate Tribunal, Department, Department, Department, the Supreme Court, First Income-Tax Officer, the Supreme Court, The Criminal Court, the Criminal Court, The Criminal Court, Court, Petitioners, Court, Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited, Court, Asstt, Customs, Indubala Chaudhary (, Court, Petitioners, Court, Bench, Indian Hume Pipe Company Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, High Courts, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Veeraman Shivalingappa Kenjalgi & Ors, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, the High Court, Magistrate, the Criminal Application

GPE: Bombay, L-4, New Delhi, R.G., Bombay, New Delhi, Bombay, New Delhi, Accused, Govt, Gopinath v. State of Himachal Pradesh, CRI, L.J., Bombay, Delhi, Bombay, New Delhi, Bombay, Uttamchand, Uttamchand, Uttamchand, Single Judges, Uttamchand, Counsel, Uttamchand, Bombay, Smt

NORP: Central Excises, Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise

PRODUCT: RG - 1, the Excise Officers, 315, Vidyawati

ORDINAL: first, first, first, secondly, second

FAC: Mahalaxmi Railway Station, Norode Baran, Bombay i.e. Pure Drinks Pvt. Ltd.

WORK_OF_ART: Officers

EVENT: the Enquiry under Section 202

MONEY: 476 I.P.C. 418

LOC: Central Circle